[Surgical treatment of traumatic intrathoracic esophageal perforations by foreign bone].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the staging criteria and surgical treatment strategy of traumatic intrathoracic esophageal perforations by foreign bone. METHODS: Fifty-seven patients with intrathoracic esophageal perforations caused by foreign bone in our department from January 1980 to June 2006 were studied. Patients were divided into 4 grades: grade I was esophageal perforation without mediastinitis (n=17), grade II was esophageal perforation with severe mediastinitis (n=13), grade III was esophageal perforation with severe empyema (n=21), grade IV was esophageal perforation with tracheal or aorto-esophageal fistula (n=6). Based on the stage of esophageal perforation, operative procedures were selected including esophagotomy, esophageal repair, esophagectomy, mediastinal drainage, and esophagus reconstruction with colon. RESULTS: In grade I, II and III, all but one patient experienced satisfactory healing of the esophagus. One patient died of multi-organ failure from septic complication. No leakage was observed. Normal swallowing function and improved weight gain was achieved in all the patients. There were 2 deaths in grade IV (2/6). CONCLUSIONS: Grading of esophageal perforation caused by foreign bone is helpful to the decision of surgical treatment strategy.

[Observation on the long-term complications after esophageal replacement with colon].

OBJECTIVE: To study the etiology and preventive measures of the long-term postoperative complication after esophageal replacement with colon for esophageal benign disease. METHODS: To review the clinical data of 577 patients with esophageal replacement with colon our department, including 123 cases of esophageal benign disease. Of all, there were 25 cases-time for 11 cases following with severe complication: redundancy and dilated colon 12 cases-time, severe stricture of stoma 4, macrocyst esophagus 2, colon-stomach stoma expansion 4, mechanical obstruction of colon 3. The etiology included iatrogenic and functionality. The therapy included stricture form or resection, redundancy segment resection, obstructed segment solution and stoma resection and form. RESULTS: Eight cases underwent once operation, 2 case twice, 1 case three times. After operation, 9 cases took food normally, 2 improved symptoms obviously. CONCLUSIONS: The iatrogenic and functionality factor contributed to severe complication after esophageal replacement with colon for esophageal benign disease. The preventive measure is followed during operation: cervical esophageal-colon anastomosis exceed 2.5 centimeter, abdominal colon-stomach anastomosis reflux, channel width of colon passage, intestinal canal lay up straight. Re-operation is best choice to for local stricture, colon expansion, redundancy and dilated colon.

[Surgical anatomy of the colic vessels in Chinese and its influence on the operation of esophageal replacement with colon].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the configuration of colic vessels in Chinese and its influence on the operation of esophageal replacement with colon (ERC). METHODS: The origin, trend, branching, configuration, and distribution of the colic vessels, the intensity of the colic arterial impulse, the integrity of the marginal artery at the splenic flexure and hepatic flexure of colon were observed during the operation of ERC among 582 patients undergoing ERC, 402 males mad 180 females, aged 2 approximately 74, from 22 provinces, municipality, and autonomous regions. RESULTS: The left colic artery (LCA) stemmed from the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) in 97.3% of the patients, with an absence rate of 0.7%. The middle colic artery (MCA) stemmed from the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) in 77.8% of the patients with an absence rate of 8.2%. Accessory middle colic artery (acMCA), originating from the right colic artery, could be seen in 6.2% of the patients 39.7% of the right colic artery (RCA) stemmed from the SMA by itself, 23.0% of the RMA stemmed together with MCA, and 28.0% of the RCA stemmed together with the ileocolic artery. The absence rate of RCA was 9.8%. The intactness rate of marginal artery was 96.8% at the splenic flexure of colon, and was 88.7% at the hepatic flexure. The Rolan arch was seen in only 7.6% of the patients. CONCLUSION: The configuration of colic vessels in Chinese was basically similar to those of the results of autopsies carried out abroad. The optimal supply artery of colic segment during ERC is LCA, followed by LCA. Attention should be paid to the integrity of marginal arteries and veins in the patients with history of epigastric operation.

[Classification and surgical treatment of intrathoracic esophageal injury caused by foreign body].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the classification criterion and surgical treatment strategy of intrathoracic esophageal injury caused by foreign body. METHODS: Eighty-four patients with intrathoracic esophageal injury caused by foreign body in our department from January 1980 to April 2004 were divided into 4 grade: grade I was non-penetrated injury of esophagus (18 cases); grade II was esophageal perforation with mild mediastinitis (39 cases); grade III was esophageal perforation with severe intrathoracic infection (17 cases); grade IV was aortoesophageal fistula (10 cases). Based on the degree of esophageal injury and the extension of inflammation, operative procedures were selected including esophagotomy, esophageal reparation, esophagectomy, mediastinal drainage, reparation of fistula and replacement of aorta. RESULTS: Patients in grade I and II were all cured . One death occurred in grade III (1/17), the same in Grade IV was 9 (9/10). CONCLUSIONS: Classification of esophageal injury caused by foreign body is helpful to the decision of surgical treatment strategy. The prevention of aortoesophageal fistula is the key point of reducing of mortality.

[Surgery for upper or middle thoracic esophageal carcinoma after gastrectomy].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the surgical treatment and technical key-points of upper or middle thoracic esophageal carcinoma in patients with history of gastrectomy. METHODS: Eighty-six patients with upper or middle thoracic esophageal carcinoma after previous gastrectomy received surgical treatment between 1980 and 2004. Among them, tumor location was in middle thoracic esophagus in 50 patients, in upper thoracic esophagus in 31 and cervical esophagus in 5. Postoperative pathological staging was stage I in 16 patients, stage IIa in 62, stage IIb in 5 and stage III in 8. The interval between gastrectomy and the diagnosis of esophageal carcinoma ranged from 2 to 22 years. Surgical procedures included esophagectomy and reconstruction with nonreversed gastric tube in 2 patients and reversed gastric tube in 3. The esophagus was reconstructed with short segment of colon in 5 patients and long segment of colon in 74. Two cases underwent jejunostomy only. RESULTS: Seventy-six patients (88%) were treated with curative intent. Seven patients (8%) received palliative surgery. Postoperative complication rate was 12% (10/86). One patient died of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS). Sixty-seven patients were followed up, the 1-, 3-, 5-year survival rates were 84% (56/67), 57% (38/67) and 22% (15/67), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical treatment is the first choice for esophageal cancer patients after gastrectomy although the procedures are complicated. The surgery should be considered as a reliable therapeutic modality because of favorable patient prognosis. The replacement with colon is recommended for those patients.

Surgical treatment of giant esophageal leiomyoma.

AIM: To summarize the operative experiences for giant leiomyoma of esophagus. METHODS: Eight cases of giant esophageal leiomyoma (GEL) whose tumors were bigger than 10 cm were treated surgically in our department from June 1980 to March 2004. All of these cases received barium swallow roentgenography and esophagoscopy. Leiomyoma located in upper thirds of the esophagus in one case, middle thirds of the esophagus in five cases, lower thirds of the esophagus in two cases. Resection of tumors was performed successfully in all of these cases. Operative methods included transthoracic extramucosal enucleation and buttressing the muscular defect with pedicled great omental flap (one case), esophagectomy and esophago-gastrostomy above the arch of aorta (three cases), total esophagectomy and esophageal replacement with colon (four cases). Histological examination confirmed that all of these cases were leiomyoma. RESULTS: All of the eight patients recovered approvingly with no mortality and resumed normal diet after operation. Vomiting during meals occurred in one patient with esophagogastrostomy, and remained 1 mo. Reflux esophagitis occurred in one patient with esophago-gastrostomy and was alleviated with medication. Thoracic colon syndrome (TCS) occurred in one patient with colon replacement at 15 mo postoperatively. No recurrence occurred in follow-up from 6 mo to 8 years. CONCLUSION: Surgical treatment for GEL is both safe and effective. The choices of operative methods mainly depend on the location and range of lesions. We prefer to treat GEL via esophagectomy combined with esophago-gastrostomy or esophagus replacement with colon. The long-time quality of life is better in the latter.