The Mediating Role of Psychological Well-Being in the Relationship Between Self-Management and Quality of Life in Patients With Hypertension.

This study applied a cross-sectional design to examine the relationship between self-management, psychological well-being, and quality of life in patients with hypertension and evaluated the mediation effect of psychological well-being on self-management and quality of life. Through purposive sampling, this study enrolled 255 patients with hypertension from the cardiology department of a teaching hospital in Taiwan. Mediation effects were estimated using linear regression and the Sobel test. Age, number of chronic diseases, waist circumference, self-management, and psychological well-being explained 18.7% of the total variance in quality of life. Psychological well-being partially mediated the effects of self-management on quality of life, with a total effect of 19.2%. Psychological well-being is an important factor correlated with self-management and quality of life in patients with hypertension.

Effect of Patient-Centered Self-Management Program on Blood Pressure, Renal Function Control, and the Quality of Life of Patients With Hypertensive Nephropathy: A Longitudinal Randomized Controlled Trial.

This longitudinal study with a randomized controlled trial evaluated the long-term effectiveness of the patient-centered self-management intervention program on the control of blood pressure and renal function, as well as the quality of life of patients with hypertensive nephropathy. The control group (n = 38) received usual care while the experimental group (n = 38) participated in a patient-centered self-management program. After the pre-test, the intervention was performed with the experimental group once a week for a total of 4 weeks. Then, the post-test was performed 1, 3, and 6 months later. A questionnaire was used to collect the demographic data and disease characteristics, laboratory data, and quality of life scale. This study tracked three time points (i.e., 1, 3, and 6 months) after the intervention and found that the experimental group achieved significant results in controlling systolic blood pressure (p < 0.001), diastolic blood pressure (p = 0.007), and eGFR (p = 0.013). Significant results were achieved in the overall quality of life (p < 0.001) and the quality of life in the physical (PHC; p < 0.001) and mental health components (MHC; p < 0.001). Furthermore, the effects in the experimental group lasted for as long as 6 months and were better than those in the control group. Moreover, this program can provide nursing staff with a reference different from traditional health education methods.

Effect of patient-centred self-management programme on mental health, self-efficacy and self-management of patients with hypertensive nephropathy: A randomised controlled trial.

AIM AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of patient-centred self-management programme on mental health, self-efficacy and self-management of patients with hypertensive nephropathy. BACKGROUND: If the symptoms of hypertension are not well-controlled, deterioration of renal function will accelerate and evolve into hypertensive nephropathy. DESIGN: A randomised single-blind trial. This article follows the requirements of CONSORT statement. METHODS: The experimental group (n = 35) after pre-test used patient-centred self-management programme once a week for a total of 4 weeks and the intervention effect was measured after 3 months for post-test. Contrarily, the traditional care was employed for the control group (n = 35). The measuring outcomes included mental health, self-efficacy and self-management. Trial registry is listed under https://clinicaltrials.gov/ with Identifier No. NCT04633993. RESULTS: After the intervention, the average score of mental health for the experimental group was 20.79 (SD = 0.82) which was higher than the 19.27 points for the control group (SD = 0.77) and showed a significant difference (F = 8.31, p = .005, partial eta2  = 0.133). In terms of self-efficacy, the average score for the experimental group was 214.13 (SD = 6.40), which was higher than the 189.58 points for the control group (SD = 6.03) and exhibited a significant difference (F = 11.82, p = .001, partial eta2  = 0.197). Regarding self-management, the average score of the experimental group was 75.12 (SD = 2.29) which was significantly higher than the 68.80 points of the control group (SD = 2.43) (F = 11.17, p = .001, partial eta2  = 0.190). CONCLUSIONS: In addition to promoting mental health of individual cases, this intervention also increases their self-confidence in disease control and improves their self-management on diseases. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The intervention provides an effective option for clinical care workers as a replacement for or supplement to the traditional care.