Serious Illness Communication Training Among Radiation Oncology Residents.

PURPOSE: Education and specific training on serious illness communication skills for radiation oncology residents is lacking. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education requires radiation oncology residents to demonstrate interpersonal and communication skills; however, implementing specific training to address this poses an ongoing challenge. This study assesses the feasibility and effectiveness of a radiation oncology specific serious illness communication curriculum at a single radiation oncology residency program. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The primary objectives were to assess observable communication skills among radiation oncology residents and their perceived level of preparedness and comfort with patient encounters surrounding serious illness. Each resident participated in a baseline simulated patient encounter. Two virtual half-day experience-based learning sessions led by faculty experts trained in teaching serious illness communication were held. The training consisted of brief didactic teaching, with the emphasis on small group guided practice with simulated patients in scenarios specific to radiation oncology. Each resident participated in a postcourse simulated patient encounter. Three blinded faculty trained in serious illness communication completed objective assessments of observable communication skills to compare pre- and postcourse performance. RESULTS: A t test based on validated assessments reviewed by blinded faculty demonstrated significant improvement in overall observable communication skills among radiation oncology residents in the postcourse encounter compared with the precourse encounter (P = .0067). Overall, 8 of 9 (89%) residents felt more comfortable and prepared with radiation oncology-specific serious illness communication after the course compared with prior. The simulated patients rated the overall average resident performance higher on the postcourse assessment (Likert 4.89/5) compared with the precourse assessment (Likert 4.09/5), which trended toward a significant improvement (P = .0515). CONCLUSIONS: Radiation oncology residents had a significant improvement in observable communication skills after participating in an experience-based training curriculum. This course can serve as an adaptable model that may be implemented by other radiation oncology residency programs.

Transfusion practices at end of life for hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients.

PURPOSE: Limited data exist regarding transfusion practices at end of life (EOL) for hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) patients. The purpose of this study was to examine red blood cell (RBC) and platelet transfusion practices in HSCT patients who enrolled or did not enroll in hospice. METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective chart review in deceased HSCT patients. The primary objective was to determine the mean difference between the last transfusion and death in HSCT patients (n = 116) who enrolled or did not enroll in hospice. RESULTS: Sixteen (14%) and 100 (86%) patients were enrolled in hospice and not enrolled in hospice, respectively. Hospice patients observed a larger mean difference between death and last transfusion (45.9 ± 66.7 vs. 14.6 ± 48.1 days, p < 0.0001). A higher amount of platelet, but not RBC, transfusions occurred in patients not enrolled in hospice (p = 0.04). The last transfusion that occurred more than 96 h before death was observed in 12 (75%) and 22 (22%) in hospice and non-hospice patients, respectively. For HSCT patients not enrolled in hospice, 17 patients received a transfusion on the same day of death and 31 patients received the last transfusion 24 h before death. CONCLUSIONS: Blood transfusion practices differed in HSCT patients enrolled and not enrolled in hospice. For most patients not enrolled in hospice, the last transfusion occurred 24 h before death. Future efforts should explore if limited access to blood products is a barrier to hospice enrollment for HSCT patients.

Advance Care Planning and Palliative Care Integration for Patients Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation.

PURPOSE: Advance care planning (ACP) in hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) is challenging, given the potential for cure despite increased morbidity and mortality risk.The aim of this study was to evaluate ACP and palliative care (PC) integration for patients who underwent HSCT. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted and data were extracted from electronic medical records of patients who underwent HSCT between January 2011 and December 2015. Patients who received more than one transplant and who were younger than 18 years of age were excluded. The primary objective was to determine the setting and specialty of the clinician who documented the initial and final code status. Secondary objectives included evaluation of advance directive and/or completion of the Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment form, PC consultation, hospice enrollment, and location of death. RESULTS: The study sample comprised 39% (n = 235) allogeneic and 61% (n = 367) autologous HSCTs. All patients except one (n = 601) had code status documentation, and 99.2% (n = 596) were initially documented as full code. Initial and final code status documentation in the outpatient setting was 3% (n = 17) and 24% (n = 143), respectively. PC consultation occurred for 19% (n = 114) of HSCT patients, with 83% (n = 95) occurring in the hospital. Allogeneic transplant type and age were significantly associated with greater rates of advance directive and/or Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment completion. Most patients (85%, n = 99) died in the hospital, and few were enrolled in hospice (15%, n = 17). CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the largest single-center study of ACP and PC integration for patients who underwent HSCT. Code status documentation in the outpatient setting was low, as well as utilization of PC and hospice services.