Comparative efficacy of Glubran and polyvinyl-alcohol particles in the embolization of meningiomas.

PURPOSE: Preoperative embolization of meningiomas decreases intraoperative bleeding and shortens operation time. However, in meningiomas predominantly vascularized by the internal carotid artery (ICA) or vertebral artery (VA) branches, embolization of external carotid artery feeder branches may lead to a hemodynamic increase in blood supply from the ICA or VA, whereas embolization of ICA or VA feeder branches with particle embolic agents may be associated with complications. This study investigated the safety and efficacy of Glubran, a liquid embolic agent, for the embolization of this type of meningioma compared with polyvinyl-alcohol (PVA) particles. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2006 to June 2015, 157 consecutive patients (98 females; mean age = 48.3 years) who suffered from meningiomas and were preoperatively referred for embolization were retrospectively analyzed. Glubran (n = 40) and PVA (n = 55) were used to devascularize tumors. Sixty-two patients were not embolized because of dangerous anastomosis or other tumor characteristics. Intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative time, degree of angiographic devascularization and embolization-related complications were analyzed. RESULTS: The intraoperative blood loss and operative time were significantly lower in the Glubran-embolized versus non-embolized group. Furthermore, Glubran embolization significantly reduced intraoperative blood loss and operative time for meningiomas that received their primary blood supply from the ICA and/or VA compared with PVA embolization. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative meningioma embolization with Glubran decreases intraoperative blood loss and operative time. Furthermore, embolization with Glubran produces more effective devascularization compared with PVA for meningiomas supplied by the ICA and/or VA. Thus, Glubran may represent a better embolic agent for this meningioma subtype.

Endovascular Treatment of Dissecting Aneurysms of the Posterior Inferior Cerebellar Artery and Predictors of Outcome.

BACKGROUND: Isolated dissecting aneurysms of the posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) are rare lesions, which carry high risk of rebleeding and mortality. However, the existing literature concerning predictors of outcome after endovascular treatment is limited and controversial. Our present study retrospectively reviewed and analyzed the clinical outcome of endovascular treatment-ruptured PICA-dissecting aneurysms and explored the predictors of outcome. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 17 consecutive patients with ruptured PICA dissecting aneurysms that underwent endovascular treatment from January 2003 to January 2014. Nine patients underwent selective coiling, whereas 7 patients underwent parent artery occlusion and 1 patient underwent stent-assisted coiling. Follow-up outcomes were evaluated using the modified Rankin Scale. The clinical outcomes of patients were categorized as favorable (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score 0-1) or unfavorable (mRS score 2-6). RESULTS: Favorable outcomes (mRS score 0-1) were obtained in 13 of 17 patients. Post-treatment recurrence occurred in 1 patient with selective coiling in the 15-month follow-up, and the patient received stent-assisted coiling. The only patients with stent-assisted coiling developed PICA occlusion during follow-up. Aneurysm located in distal segment usually presented with intraventricular hemorrhage (P = .015). Hypertension, coexisting hydrocephalus, and time to operation (latter than 2 weeks) were associated with unfavorable outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular treatment of isolated dissecting aneurysm of PICA had excellent clinical outcomes, hypertension, coexisting hydrocephalus, and time to operation (latter than 2 weeks), which were associated with unfavorable outcome. Long-term follow-ups are necessary to provide stronger conclusions.

Predictors of Favorable Outcome of Intracranial Basilar Dissecting Aneurysm.

BACKGROUND: Management of intracranial basilar dissecting aneurysms has been controversial and challenging, and surgical and conservative treatments usually have a bad prognosis. Our study aimed at evaluating the outcomes of endovascular treatment for these lesions and exploring the predictors of favorable outcome. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 50 consecutive patients with basilar dissecting aneurysms from January 2006 to January 2013. Twenty-four patients underwent stent-assisted coiling whereas 26 patients underwent conservative treatment. Follow-up outcomes were evaluated using modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score. RESULTS: Of the patients treated with stent-assisted coiling, 20 patients had a favorable outcome (mRS score, 0-1), post-treatment recurrence occurred in 3 patients, 1 had rebleeding, and 2 had no rebleeding. Of the patients treated with conservative therapy (observation or anticoagulation), 10 patients had an unfavorable outcome, 2 patients with ruptured aneurysms developed rebleeding, and 8 patients had poor outcome because of infarct progression. Stent-assisted coiling group had a more favorable outcome than the conservatively treated group (83.3% versus 55.2%, P = .019). Initial complete obliteration was related to the favorable outcome in endovascular-treated group (P = .042). Stent placement was the only independent predictor of favorable outcome in the logistic regression analysis (P = .030; odds ratio = 5.828; 95% confidence interval, 1.192-28.503). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with basilar artery dissecting aneurysms treated with stent-assisted coiling had a more favorable outcome than the conservatively treated patients. Stent placement and initial complete occlusion were the favorable factors in patients with basilar dissecting aneurysm.