X-ray, digital tomographic fusion, CT, and MRI in early ischemic necrosis of the femoral head.

To investigate the imaging performance of radiography, digital tomographic fusion (DTS), computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnosis of early avascular necrosis of the femoral head (ANFH). A total of 220 patients with ANFH who visited our hospital from January 2020 to January 2022 were included in the study. X-ray, DTS, CT, and MRI examinations of both hips were performed for all patients. The trabecular structure, bone density changes, femoral head morphology, and joint space changes were observed using the aforementioned imaging modalities. The staging was performed according to the Association Research Circulation Osseous (ARCO) criteria. The diagnostic detection rate of each imaging modality, and the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of each examination for diagnosing early ANFH were calculated and compared. Patients were diagnosed with stage I (n = 65), stage II (n = 85), stage III (n = 32), and stage IV (n = 38) ANFH. For MRI, the detection rate (97.7%), sensitivity (94.7%), specificity (88.6%), positive predictive value (95.9%), and negative predictive value (92.5%), for diagnosing early ANFH, were significantly higher than those of other imaging methods (P < .05). MRI is the most accurate and sensitive imaging method for diagnosing early ANFH and has important clinical applications.

Clinical value of digital tomographic fusion imaging in the diagnosis of avascular necrosis of the femoral head in adults.

BACKGROUND: To explore the clinical significance of digital tomographic fusion imaging in the diagnosis of avascular disease of the femoral head in adults. METHODS: Eighty-two adult patients with avascular necrosis of the femoral head confirmed by MRI in the department of orthopedics of our hospital were studied retrospectively. The related signs of adult avascular necrosis of the femoral head were diagnosed by digital tomographic fusion imaging, and the detection rates of digital X-ray (DR) and digital tomosynthesis (DTS) were compared to clarify the clinical value of digital tomographic fusion imaging in the diagnosis of adult avascular necrosis of the femoral head. RESULTS: DTS detected DR and 78 cases identified 55 cases. Taking the results of CT/MRI as the gold standard, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of DR and DTS in the diagnosis of ANFH were calculated. There was a significant difference in the detection rate between the two methods (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The digital tomographic fusion imaging technique has the advantages of high detection rate and excellent image quality, is economical, and is worth popularizing. For those with negative X-rays, DTS diagnosis and CT or/and MRI can avoid unnecessary CT and MRI examinations, which is helpful to reduce the waste of medical resources.