Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Mutagenesis ; 3(3): 193-205, 1988 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3045481

ABSTRACT

Mutagenicity results are presented for 50 compounds tested in the mouse lymphoma TK+/(-)----TK-/- forward mutation assay. Test compounds were mostly from chemical classes not previously tested, to provide new information on the sensitivity of the assay; chemicals of low toxicity or thought to be non-carcinogenic and metabolic inhibitors, to indicate whether and under what conditions the assay can generate so-called false positive results. Twelve compounds that have been tested previously were included in this study to provide an indication of the reproducibility of the assay. Concordant results were obtained for nine of these, while disagreeing, positive results were seen with aniline, fluorene and pyrene. The following compounds belonging to the noncarcinogen category were positive at concentrations in the range 0.02-1 mol/l: dimethyl sulphoxide, EDTA, glucose, polyethyleneglycol, sodium chloride, sodium nitrite and urea. Measurements of the osmotic pressure indicated a lack of a simple relationship to mutagenic effects for these compounds. While the potent mutagenic/carcinogenic compounds tested gave greater than 4-fold increases in the mutation frequency, weak carcinogens or compounds not known to be carcinogenic that were positive in the assay gave increases of between 2- and 4-fold. Exceptions were aldehyde derivatives and chemicals that can lead to oxidative stress, which were detected with exaggerated sensitivity by the assay. Among the metabolic inhibitors tested, positive results were obtained with actinomycin D, cycloheximide, diethyl maleate, hydroxyurea and ouabain. Negative results were found with antimycin A. On the basis of the present results and previously published data it is concluded that a maximum limit for the test compound concentration can be set at 20 mmol/l and that testing to 20% total growth is adequate, with certain stipulations, to detect the mutagenic activity of test compounds. A similar analysis of the available test data shows that less than 4-fold increases in the mutation frequency have a lower predictivity for carcinogenicity.


Subject(s)
Leukemia L5178/genetics , Leukemia, Experimental/genetics , Thymidine Kinase/genetics , Animals , Cell Survival/drug effects , Leukemia L5178/enzymology , Mice , Mutagenicity Tests/methods , Tumor Cells, Cultured
2.
Cell Biol Toxicol ; 2(4): 441-55, 1986 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3267458

ABSTRACT

The toxicity of most antiviral compounds was dependent on the type of cell used to assay toxicity. Ranking of compounds according to toxicity was, however, very similar (p less than 0.01) in the three different cell types used in this study. The difference in toxicity observed for 9-beta-D-arabinofuranosyladenine between Flow 5000 cells and CCRF-SB cells could not be accounted for by differences in the intracellular concentrations. On the other hand, the different toxicities observed for ribavirin and 2'-deoxy-5-trifluorothymidine between Flow 5000 cells and CCRF-SB cells may be caused by the culture conditions (as shown for one cell type, HeLa S3, grown either as monolayer or in suspension) rather than by cell-specific differences. The growth-inhibitory effect of most antiviral compounds increased with treatment time, indicating an additive nature of toxicity. The ability of cells to recover from toxic treatment with drugs varied greatly from compound to compound (from undetectable regrowth to 140% growth compared to control cells). Coaddition of natural nucleosides could, at best, only partly protect cells from the toxic influences of antiviral nucleoside analogs. As a result of comparing antiviral effects and toxicity in vitro, the unselective compounds may be eliminated from further development at the screening level.


Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/toxicity , Cell Division/drug effects , Animals , Cells, Cultured , Dogs , Humans , Mice
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL