Additional cuff suture provides mechanical advantage for fixation of split-type greater tuberosity fracture of humerus.

PURPOSE: Split type of greater tuberosity fracture has variety of surgical treatment options. This study aimed to compare the biomechanics property of additional cuff suture and other fracture fixation techniques. METHODS: Fifteen porcine humeri were categorized into three groups of fixation techniques those were proximal humeral internal locking system (PHILOS) plate with 2 cuff sutures, nonlocking (conventional, 3.5 mm) T-plate with 2 cuff sutures and T-plate with washer that had additional cuff suture (novel technique). Fracture was created by greater tuberosity osteotomy with 50˚ inclination to the line of surgical neck and then fixed with different prescribed techniques. Displacement of fracture site was measured with universal testing machine. The maximum forces to produce 3 mm, 5 mm of displacement and load to failure were recorded. RESULTS: The average loads to reach 3 mm, 5 mm displacement and failure were 30.8 N, 45.4 N and 161 N for nonlocking T-plate; 76.6 N, 99.2 N and 144 N for PHILOS plate; 95.8 N, 120 N and 197 N for novel technique. The differences among three groups were significant in load to displacement at 3 and 5 mm (but not significant in load to failure). For load to reach 3- and 5-mm displacement, PHILOS plate and novel technique were significantly stronger than nonlocking T-plate (P < 0.05). For load to reach 3 and 5 mm displacement, novel technique was stronger than PHILOS plate but not significant (P > 0.05). For load to failure, novel technique was stronger than nonlocking plate and PHILOS plate but not significant (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The important factors affecting the strength of fracture fixation are type of plate and numbers of suture augmentation that tie to the plate. Fixation with additional cuff suture showed the superior biomechanics of load to reach 3 mm, 5 mm displacement with better load to failure compared with PHILOS plate and conventional T-plate alone.

The University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder scale: translation, reliability and validation of a Thai version of UCLA shoulder scale in rotator cuff tear patients.

BACKGROUND: UCLA Shoulder Scale is a useful evaluation tool to assess the functional outcome of shoulder after treatments. It has been translated into several languages. The objectives of this study were to translate UCLA Shoulder Scale into Thai language and validate the translated version in patients with rotator cuff tear. METHODS: This study consists of 2 phases: 1) Development of the Thai version of UCLA Shoulder Scale and 2) Validation of the translated version. The UCLA Shoulder Scale was translated into Thai according to the international guideline. Seventy-eight subjects with a mean age of 71 ± 11.5 took part in the study. All had shoulder pain and rotator cuff tear according to MRI from 2019 to 2020. Four patients were excluded due to incomplete questionnaires. The data from 21 patients whose symptoms in shoulder joint had not changed within 14 days were analyzed with the UCLA Shoulder Scale test-retest using intraclass correlation (ICC), Standard Error of Measurement (SEM) and Minimal Detectable Change (MDC). The Thai version of UCLA Shoulder Scale was compared to the validated Thai versions of American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC) and Shortened version of The Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) shoulder scores. RESULTS: Thai version of UCLA Shoulder Scale was developed following the guideline. Moderate to strong correlations were found using Spearman's correlation coefficient between pain, function and total score of Thai version of UCLA Shoulder Scale. The reliability of total UCLA Shoulder Scale was excellent (ICC = 0.99, 95% CI 0.97-1.00), whereas agreement assessed with SEM and MDC (0.18 and 0.50 respectively) demonstrated a positive rating. The validity analysis of total UCLA Shoulder Scale (Thai version) showed moderate to strong correlations with total ASES, total WORC and QuickDASH (Thai versions). The Thai version of UCLA Shoulder Scale showed no floor and ceiling effects from the results. CONCLUSION: The Thai version of UCLA Shoulder Scale is a reliable and valid tool for assessing the function and disability of the shoulder in Thai patients who have rotator cuff tear.