CA 72-4 serum marker--a new tool in the management of carcinoma patients.

Among the new tumor markers that have been recently proposed, CA 72-4 is of particular interest, not only for its capabilities in diagnosing and monitoring certain neoplastic diseases, but also for its excellent specificity. Several studies focused on the potential clinical usefulness of CA 72-4 in gastrointestinal (GI) and gynecological cancer, showing a sensitivity of approximately 40% in colorectal and gastric cancer and 50% in ovarian cancer, with an overall specificity of more than 95%. Longitudinal evaluations of patients with either GI or gynecological malignant diseases demonstrated that significant elevations of CA 72-4 serum levels may be predictive of recurrent disease. Moreover, the combination of CA 72-4 with other known serum markers, such as CEA and CA 19-9 for GI cancer or CA 125 for ovarian cancer, indicated that an increase in the sensitivity can be achieved without substantial changes in the overall specificity, improving the possibility of monitoring these patients. In conclusion, these results provide a strong argument for the use of CA 72-4 in the management of these neoplastic diseases.

Nerve-sparing surgery in 302 resectable rectosigmoid cancer patients: genitourinary morbidity and 10-year survival.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate 5-year and 10-year disease-free survival, urinary dysfunction, and sexual activity after nerve-sparing radical surgery, including lumboaortic lymphadenectomy for rectosigmoid cancer. METHODS: Since 1980 to 1992, 302 consecutive patients affected with rectal (188) or sigmoid (114) resectable cancer underwent radical surgery. Lumboaortic lymphadenectomy was routinely performed and total mesorectal dissection was always accomplished in rectal cancer. Splanchnic nerves, superior hypogastric plexus, hypogastric nerves, and sacral parasympathetic nerves were sought, identified, and preserved or, when necessary, unilaterally sacrificed. Fifty-three (17.6 percent) patients were classified Dukes A, 145 (48.0 percent) B, 46 (15.2 percent) C1, and 17 (5.6 percent) C2. Thirty-nine (12.9 percent) patients were Dukes D. In 85 rectal cancer patients, tumor was located at the lower third. Eighty-six of 210 Dukes B and C patients were submitted to systemic chemotherapy and/or high-dose pelvic radiotherapy. RESULTS: The actuarial 5-year disease-free survival was 58.5 percent in rectal and 65.7 percent in sigmoid cancer patients, median follow-up time was 47 months. During the follow-up, each patient was interviewed about sexual activity and urinary dysfunction and a questionnaire was filled out. Urinary dysfunction was not frequently observed, while a definitive sexual impotence was reported in 27.6 percent of the patients. The age under 60 years and sphincter-saving surgery were demonstrated as significantly contributing to retaining a satisfactory sexual activity. CONCLUSIONS: Unexpectedly high disease-free survival was observed in the Dukes C2 subgroup. It allows us to hypothesize that lumboaortic lymphadenectomy could remove neoplastic microfoci present at this level in those patients, enhancing surgical chances of cure. The majority of male patients under 60 years old can retain a satisfactory sexual activity after undergoing a nerve-sparing sphincter-saving cancer surgery.

Improved local control and survival with the "sandwich" technique of pelvic radiotherapy for resectable rectal cancer. A retrospective, multivariate analysis.

PURPOSE: The following study was done to evaluate the therapeutic value of radiotherapy as an adjunct to surgery for rectal cancer patients. METHODS: One-hundred twenty-four patients underwent curative resection by one surgeon (RC) from 1982 to 1991. Forty patients received combined preoperative and postoperative (sandwich) radiotherapy, 30 patients received postoperative radiotherapy, and 54 patients were treated by surgery alone. During the study period sandwich radiotherapy was primarily offered as a free treatment option for patients with tumors which were believed to be transmurally invasive, whereas postoperative radiotherapy was an alternative therapeutic option offered to patients with tumor classified as Dukes B and C at histopathologic examination. RESULTS: Operative mortality was 2 percent in the sandwich radiotherapy group vs. 7 percent in the surgery alone group. After a median follow-up of 60 months, the actuarial locoregional recurrence rate at five years was 3 percent for the sandwich radiotherapy group compared with 18 and 30 percent for the postoperative radiotherapy and surgery alone groups, respectively (P = 0.019). A multivariate analysis using the Cox model confirmed the favorable independent influence of sandwich radiotherapy on local tumor control, especially in distal tumors. The therapeutic benefit of sandwich radiotherapy translated into increased survival in the low-rectum Dukes B subgroup of patients. The actuarial five-year survival rates were 86 percent, 50 percent, and 28 percent in the sandwich radiotherapy, postoperative radiotherapy and surgery alone groups, respectively (P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative radiotherapy has a significant effect on the prognosis of rectal cancer patients.