Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Expert Rev Endocrinol Metab ; 18(2): 131-142, 2023 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36882974

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The most significant articles on diabetes pharmacotherapy and technology in the peer-reviewed literature from 2020, as determined by a panel of pharmacists with expertise in diabetes care and education, are summarized. AREAS COVERED: Members of the Association of Diabetes Care and Education Specialists Pharmacy Community of Interest were selected to review articles published in prominent peer-reviewed journals in 2020 that most impacted diabetes pharmacotherapy and technology. A list of 37 nominated articles were compiled (22 in diabetes pharmacotherapy and 15 in diabetes technology). Based on discussion among the authors, the articles were ranked based on significant contribution, impact, and diversity to diabetes pharmacotherapy and technology. The top 10 highest ranked publications (n = 6 for diabetes pharmacotherapy and n = 4 in diabetes technology) are summarized in this article. EXPERT OPINION: With the significant number of publications in diabetes care and education, it can be challenging and overwhelming to remain current with published literature. This review article may be helpful in identifying key articles in diabetes pharmacotherapy and technology from the year 2020.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents , Communicable Diseases , Diabetes Mellitus , Humans , Communicable Diseases/drug therapy , Anti-Infective Agents/therapeutic use , Peer Review , Diabetes Mellitus/drug therapy
2.
J Pharm Pract ; 35(4): 524-527, 2022 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33622071

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The American Diabetes Association (ADA) Diabetes Risk Test (DRT) is a screening tool to identify people at risk for developing diabetes. Individuals with a DRT score of 5 or higher may have prediabetes or diabetes and should see a healthcare provider. OBJECTIVE: To determine how many additional employees are identified as being at risk for developing diabetes during an employee wellness screening by using a more stringent DRT cutoff score of 4 instead of 5. METHODS: During an annual employee wellness screening event, a hemoglobin A1C (A1c) was drawn for participants with a DRT score of > 4 or by request regardless of risk score. A1C values were classified as normal (<5.7%), prediabetes (>5.7 and <6.5%) or diabetes (>6.5%). Risk scores and A1C values were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Cost of additional laboratory testing was also reviewed. RESULTS: An A1C was collected for 158 participants. Fourteen of 50 (28%) participants with a DRT of 4 had A1c values in the prediabetes range and no history of diabetes or prediabetes. Using the lower DRT score of 4 resulted in an additional expenditure of $305 with $85.40 resulting in the identification of an otherwise unaware person at risk for developing diabetes. CONCLUSION: Using a DRT cutoff score of 4 as part of an employee wellness screening program resulted in additional laboratory costs to identify persons at risk for developing diabetes but also allowed for earlier education to slow or stop the progression to diabetes which may reduce healthcare costs over time.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Prediabetic State , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnosis , Glycated Hemoglobin , Humans , Mass Screening/methods , Prediabetic State/diagnosis , Risk Factors
3.
J Pharm Pract ; 35(6): 870-873, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33955300

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Omega-3 fatty acids eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosehexaenoic acid (DHA), often found in fish oil supplements, have been linked to cardiovascular benefits in proper doses. OBJECTIVES: Quantify serving sizes and EPA and DHA content of fish oil products and determine which products contain appropriate amounts of EPA and DHA per serving to lower cholesterol. METHODS: Products were identified through the National Institutes of Health's Dietary Supplement Label Database using the search term "fish oil." Product labels were reviewed for EPA and DHA content. The number of units, such as capsules, gummies, or milliliters, necessary to obtain a total of at least 2,000 mg of EPA and DHA was also evaluated. Descriptive statistics were used to report findings. RESULTS: Of 493 products identified, 231 products were analyzed. Two (0.9%) products, both of which were liquid formulations, contained at least 2,000 mg of EPA and DHA in the standard serving size listed on the labeling. The total amount of EPA and DHA per serving ranged from 60.2 mg to 2684 mg with an average of 697 mg. The number of servings necessary to achieve 2,000 mg of EPA and DHA ranged from 1 to 34 servings with an average of 5 servings. CONCLUSIONS: Serving sizes of fish oil products rarely result in adequate EPA and DHA intake to provide cholesterol-lowering benefit. Instruction by a trained healthcare professional, such as a pharmacist, is important to ensure patients are taking an appropriate serving of fish oil to obtain cardiovascular benefit.


Subject(s)
Fatty Acids, Omega-3 , Docosahexaenoic Acids , Fish Oils , Eicosapentaenoic Acid , Dietary Supplements
4.
Sr Care Pharm ; 36(2): 83-92, 2021 Feb 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33509331

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this systematic review is to evaluate the available evidence for safety and efficacy of over-the-counter (OTC) sleep aids used for the treatment of insomnia in older people.
DATA SOURCES: PubMed, EBSCO, and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts.
STUDY SELECTION: Five studies were included that involved humans 65 years of age and older being evaluated on OTC sleep aids in the outpatient setting.
DATA EXTRACTION: Data extraction from each study included primary and secondary efficacy endpoints, such as differences in the mean total sleep time, sleep latency, sleep efficiency, and number of awakenings, along with safety endpoints, such as psychomotor ability, cognitive ability, and adverse effect profiles. Both subjective and objective measures of changes in sleep and adverse effects were included.
DATA SYNTHESIS: Diphenhydramine had a statistically significant increase in sedation and decrease in number of awakenings but was not shown to be any less or more safe than compared products. Despite lacking safety issues, valerian was found to have no effect on subjective or objective sleep outcomes. Overall, melatonin had the most evidence and was found to have a statistically significant positive impact on sleep measures without safety issues.
CONCLUSION: Diphenhydramine and melatonin appear to be efficacious in improving some sleep measures while causing minimal adverse effects. However, there are very few studies that examine the use of over-the-counter sleep aids in those 65 years of age and older with primary insomnia. Additional studies are needed in this population.


Subject(s)
Diphenhydramine/administration & dosage , Hypnotics and Sedatives/administration & dosage , Melatonin/administration & dosage , Nonprescription Drugs , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders/drug therapy , Sleep Wake Disorders/drug therapy , Sleep/drug effects , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Diphenhydramine/adverse effects , Humans , Hypnotics and Sedatives/adverse effects , Melatonin/adverse effects , Valerian
5.
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) ; 57(3): 402-406, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28285805

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Primary study objectives were to (1) describe mean change in A1c from baseline of a free clinic population enrolled in telehealth diabetes self-management education and support (DSME/S) services and (2) to compare change in A1C and other clinical outcomes measures with free clinic patients enrolled in a traditional face-to-face DSME/S program. METHODS: An exploratory study design and comparative evaluation of telehealth DSME/S services in a free clinic population was used. Baseline clinical measures were collected upon referral. Diabetes educators met with patients individually over 2-3 months. Clinical outcomes measures were collected within 6 months of program completion. Data from the telehealth group was assessed individually and compared to a free clinic traditional DSME/S program population. RESULTS: Twelve patients completed a telehealth free clinic DSME/S pilot program with a mean ± SD change in A1C from baseline of -1.03 ± 1.53% (P = 0.050). Mean ± SD change in A1C from baseline in the free clinic population participating in traditional face-to-face DSME/S services was -1.42 ± 1.80% (P = 0.001). No significant differences in secondary outcomes measures, including body mass index and blood pressure, were revealed among the study populations. CONCLUSION: Expanding access to care in populations faced with challenges of socioeconomics, limited education, and lower health literacy is a step toward reducing health disparities and positively affecting care. Mean A1C can be improved with telehealth DSME/S services in an underserved, free clinic population.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/metabolism , Self-Management/education , Self-Management/statistics & numerical data , Telemedicine/statistics & numerical data , Blood Pressure/physiology , Body Mass Index , Female , Glycated Hemoglobin/metabolism , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Education as Topic/statistics & numerical data , Pilot Projects , Self Care/statistics & numerical data , Vulnerable Populations/statistics & numerical data
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...