Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Dermatitis ; 2024 Jan 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38285482

ABSTRACT

Background: Supplemental patch testing is an adjunct to standard patch test screening series. Objective: To determine the demographics, characteristics, frequency, relevance, and interpretation of patch test reactions for supplemental patch testing. Methods: Retrospective study of patients tested 2017-2020 with North American Contact Dermatitis Group (NACDG) and supplemental screening series (Supplemental Series A [SSA], Supplemental Series B [SSB]). Demographics, characteristics, reaction strengths, relevance, and final interpretation were recorded. Results: Cohort included 791 patients; 73.5% female, 68.6% age >40 years. 74.1% were White, 15.2% Black, 5.7% Asian, and 1.5% Hispanic. The most common dermatitis sites were scattered/generalized (27.2%), face (24.0%), and hands (23.5%). For 2017-2018 and 2019-2020, respectively, 82% (318/388) and 78.4% (316/403) had ≥1 "allergic" reaction. In addition, 13.5% (52/385) and 11.7% (47/403) had SSA reactions, and 38.1% (115/302) and 31.5% (101/321) had SSB reactions. In the 87 (2017-2018) and 99 (2019-2020) patients with negative NACDG testing, 17 (19.5%) and 12 (12.1%) had supplemental reactions. Of the 34 supplemental allergens with reaction frequency ≥1%, 58.8% (20/34) are not part of the American Contact Dermatitis Society 90 (2020) or NACDG 2021-2022 screening series. The highest frequency allergens from this group were dodecyl and octyl gallate, cinnamic alcohol, phenyl salicylate, hexahydro-1,3,5-tris-(2-hydroxyethyl) triazine, and abitol. Conclusions: Supplemental patch testing identifies additional relevant allergens in patients with suspected allergic contact dermatitis.

4.
Dermatitis ; 32(6): 421-429, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34238819

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to describe the differences in contact allergy between the United States (US) and Canada. METHODS: This is a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of the North American Contact Dermatitis Group data from 2005 to 2016. Frequencies of demographics, clinical characteristics, positive reactions, trends, and occupations were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 28,640 patients underwent patch testing. At least 1 positive patch test was observed in 18,599 patients (US, 11,641 [66.5%]; Canada, 6958 [62.5%]). When comparing the 2 groups, US positive reactions were more likely to occur in male patients (odds ratio [OR] = 1.40, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.31-1.49), older than 40 years (OR = 1.30, 95% CI = 1.22-1.38), Black (OR = 2.67, 95% CI = 2.24-3.19) or Hispanic race (OR = 3.53, 95% CI = 2.61-4.78), and/or patients with scattered generalized dermatitis (OR = 1.96, 95% CI = 1.80-2.13). They were less likely to occur in patients with eczema (OR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.57-0.65) and Asian race (OR = 0.50, 95% CI = 0.44-0.56). Nickel (US, 16.0%; Canada, 22.4%) and methylisothiazolinone (US, 13.4%; Canada, 11.0%) were the top allergens. The third most frequent was neomycin (US, 11.7%) and fragrance mix I (Canada, 10.2%). CONCLUSIONS: National differences in allergen prevalence and trends exist in North America.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/epidemiology , Patch Tests/statistics & numerical data , Registries , Adult , Age Distribution , Canada , Cross-Sectional Studies , Dermatitis, Atopic/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Sex Distribution , United States , Young Adult
5.
Dermatitis ; 32(1): 42-52, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33273222

ABSTRACT

IMPORTANCE: When fragrance- and botanical-related (F/BR) allergy is identified, concomitant reaction (CR) frequencies can help direct avoidance recommendations. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the CR rates for F/BR allergens. DESIGN: A retrospective cross-sectional analysis of the North American Contact Dermatitis Group data 2007-2016 was conducted. Frequencies of demographics, positive reactions, strength of reactions, trends, and CR rates were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 5504 (22.7%) of 24,246 patients had F/BR allergic reactions. The F/BR-sensitive patients were more likely to be female, older than age 40 years, and White and have face, leg, or anal/genital dermatitis. Top allergens included fragrance mix I (FMI, 10.6%), Myroxylon pereirae (balsam of Peru [BOP], 8%), and fragrance mix II (FMII, 4.9%). There were increasing trends for FMI, FMII, cinnamic aldehyde, and Compositae mix and decreasing trends for BOP and propolis. When patients were positive to any F/BR allergen, they were likely to be positive to FMI, FMII, and BOP. Concomitant reactions were bidirectional between multiple fragrance allergens and propolis, colophony, and Compositae mix. CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant reactions were identified between fragrances, between fragrances and BR allergens, and between BR allergens and fragrances. If CRs of greater than 10% suggest cross-reactivity, then all patients with fragrance sensitivity should avoid BR allergens and vice versa.


Subject(s)
Allergens/adverse effects , Cross Reactions , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Acrolein/adverse effects , Acrolein/analogs & derivatives , Adolescent , Adult , Asteraceae/adverse effects , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/therapy , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Myroxylon/adverse effects , Odorants , Perfume/adverse effects , Propolis/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
6.
Cutis ; 105(4): 174-176, 2020 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32463849

ABSTRACT

Essential oils (EOs) are present in products we use at home, at work, and in our environment. In recent years, there has been an increasing trend to use EOs rather than products containing chemicals perceived as harmful by consumers. In this review, we separate the facts from the myths surrounding EOs and provide scientifically sound answers to common questions.


Subject(s)
Oils, Volatile , Humans
7.
Cutis ; 104(2): 114-116, 2019 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31603954

ABSTRACT

Linear basal cell carcinoma (LBCC) is a rare morphologic variant of basal cell carcinoma. We report a case of a patient with a recurrent linear lesion on the supraclavicular neck with prior repeated mild trauma to the area. The patient was diagnosed with recurrent LBCC after a prior excision of an LBCC in the same area. A review of the literature was performed, and the demographics, anatomic location, histologic subtype, treatment methods, and frequency of recurrence for all reported cases of LBCC were summarized. Because of the likelihood of subclinical spread, LBCC should be regarded as a high-risk subtype. As such, Mohs micrographic surgery or excision with complete circumferential peripheral and deep margin assessment is recommended as first-line treatment.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Basal Cell/diagnosis , Head and Neck Neoplasms/diagnosis , Skin Neoplasms/diagnosis , Carcinoma, Basal Cell/pathology , Carcinoma, Basal Cell/surgery , Head and Neck Neoplasms/pathology , Head and Neck Neoplasms/surgery , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Mohs Surgery , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Skin Neoplasms/surgery
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...