Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Clin Imaging ; 40(4): 780-7, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27317224

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in characterizing adrenal masses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 45 adrenal masses in 38 patients underwent unenhanced CT, enhanced CT, and chemical-shift MRI. Sensitivities and accuracies using the lesion attenuation values, absolute or relative percentage washout for CT, and adrenal-to-spleen ratio or signal intensity index for MRI were calculated. Follow-up or histopathology was used as standard reference. RESULTS: A total of 15 lipid-rich adenomas, 6 lipid-poor adenomas, and 24 nonadenomas were obtained. The sensitivities for adenoma on MRI versus CT were 81% and 95%, respectively. The specificities were 100%. CONCLUSION: CT is superior to MRI in characterizing adenomas.


Subject(s)
Adrenal Gland Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Adrenal Glands/diagnostic imaging , Adult , Aged , Contrast Media , Female , Humans , Iohexol , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Radiographic Image Enhancement , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...