Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32031978

ABSTRACT

Background The Government of Indonesia has put in place many interventions for rationalizing drug use at all levels of the health services including in primary care centers (puskesmas). One of the programs for the rational use of drugs at the puskesmas is the monitoring and evaluation of drug use conducted by pharmacists. The purpose of this research was to evaluate the rationality of drug use in Pamekasan puskesmas that use World Health Organization (WHO) prescribing indicators and to find the difference in the percentage of rationality of drug use between puskesmas in Pamekasan. Methods This study reviewed official documents considering reporting of rational drug use. The documents were obtained from the district health office or from the public domain from 2014 to 2018. Data were then collated, extracted, and presented as frequencies. Results The percentage prescribed for antibiotics for acute respiratory infection (ARI) non-pneumonia was 47.27% and percentage prescribing antibiotic drugs in a non-specific diarrhea was 59.85%. The percentage prescribed for injection was 36.15%. The average number of drugs prescribed per treatment was 2.61. Conclusions The majority of WHO guidelines stated that prescribing indicators were not met by the puskesmas in Pamekasan, except for the parameters for the average number of drugs prescribed per consultation. This shows an alarming clarion call for the local healthcare stakeholders to improve such situations.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Drug Prescriptions/statistics & numerical data , Drug Utilization/standards , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Practice Guidelines as Topic/standards , Primary Health Care/organization & administration , World Health Organization/organization & administration , Humans , Indonesia
2.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32031979

ABSTRACT

Background Myalgia in patients can be associated with a large array of conditions, including injuries, infections and inflammations. Treatment for myalgia may include the use of oral, topical and injectable medicines (IM). However, the use of IM has been restricted by the World Health Organization due to the common hazards associated with inappropriate medicine use, risks of disease transmission and more expensive spending for using IM. Accordingly, the Ministry of Health of Indonesia (MoH) has limited the use at the level of ≤1% in every primary care center (Puskesmas) across the nation. The aim of this study was to report and evaluate rational drug use injection in myalgia in a Puskesmas in Pamekasan, Indonesia. Methods This study reviewed official documents, such as rational drug use report, medicine use databases and drug request report. The documents were obtained from the district health office or public domain from 2014 to 2018. Data were then collated, extracted and presented as frequencies. Results The average rate of use of IM for myalgia in Pamekasan was 36.15%. All 20 Puskesmas in Pamekasan conducted injection practice above the recommended level, thus reflecting a major gap between practice and policy implementation. This study implies that a substantial effort is needed to enforce the policy. Conclusions The use of IM for myalgia treatment in Pamekasan from 2014 to 2018 was significantly higher than the recommended level, thus reflecting a major problem in the practice. This is an alarming call for the local healthcare stakeholders to improve such a situation.


Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care/standards , Health Policy/trends , Injections/methods , Myalgia/drug therapy , Pharmaceutical Preparations/standards , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards , Primary Health Care/organization & administration , Humans , Indonesia
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...