Laryngeal cancer treatment and survival differences across regional cancer centres in Ontario, Canada.

AIMS: We conducted a population-based study of practice patterns and outcome across the regional cancer centres providing care to patients with laryngeal cancer in the Province of Ontario, Canada. MATERIALS AND METHODS: : This was a retrospective cohort study of 1547 patients with cancers of the glottic or supraglottic larynx diagnosed between 1982 and 1995. Data were collected via chart review, including: patient and disease characteristics, treatment, waiting times and treatment volumes. Vital status was obtained from the Ontario Cancer Registry. Variations across the nine regional cancer centres are described and their effect on outcome explored. All analyses were stratified by stage I and II separately from stage III and IV. RESULTS: Treatments differed across centres (P<0.0001); for instance, in the stage I and II group, use of a daily dose of >2.54Gy varied from 0 to 87.6% and in the stage III and IV group, total laryngectomy rates varied from a low of 6% to a high of 53%. The percentage of patients waiting more than 6 weeks from diagnosis to first treatment varied from 17 to 49% (P<0.0001). Multivariate analysis revealed cause-specific survival differences that were not explained by control for case mix, treatment or waiting times. Differences ranged from an 82% risk reduction in one centre compared with the reference (stage I and II group, P=0.008) to a 153% increase in risk (stage III and IV group, P=0.02). Centre case volumes were not associated with cause-specific survival. CONCLUSIONS: This study quantifies the degree of variation that can occur in the treatment and outcome of people with cancer. We cannot properly assess whether care delivery is of high quality until we have a better understanding of the factors that drive such variations.

Explaining socioeconomic status effects in laryngeal cancer.

INTRODUCTION: People with lower socioeconomic status (SES) experience shorter survival times after a cancer diagnosis for many disease sites. We determined whether area-level SES was associated with the outcomes: cause-specific survival and local-regional failure in laryngeal cancer in Ontario, Canada. When we found an association we sought explanations that might be related to access to care including age, sex, rural residence, tumor stage, lymph node status, use of diagnostic imaging, treatment type, percentage of prescribed radiotherapy delivered, number of radiotherapy interruption days, treatment waiting time, and treating cancer center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study population consisted of 661 glottic and 495 supraglottic stage-stratified randomly-sampled patients identified using the Ontario Cancer Registry. Area-level SES quintiles were assigned using adjusted median household income from the Canadian Census. Other data were collected from patient charts. Explanations for SES effects were determined by measuring whether the effect moved toward the null value by at least 10% when an access indicator was added to a the model. RESULTS: Socioeconomic status was not related to either outcome for those with supraglottic cancer, but an association was present in glottic cancer. With the highest socioeconomic status quintile as the referent group, the relative risks for patients in the lowest socioeconomic quintile were 2.75 (95% CI 1.48, 5.12) for cause-specific survival and 1.90 (95% CI 1.24, 2.93) for local-regional failure. Disease stage as measured by T-category explained between 3% and 23% of these socioeconomic effects. None of the other access indicators met our 10% change criterion. CONCLUSION: We question why people in lower socioeconomic quintiles were not diagnosed earlier in the disease progression. Having ruled out several variables that may be related to access to care, additional biologic and social variables should be examined to further understand socioeconomic status effects.

Intra-prostatic fiducial markers and concurrent androgen deprivation.

AIMS: To document the case of a man with adenocarcinoma of the prostate treated with external beam radiotherapy and concurrent androgen deprivation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The man, who received 79.8 Gy in 42 fractions of radiotherapy over 8.5 weeks using three intra-prostatic gold fiducial markers for on-line set-up correction, started an anti-androgen 2.5 weeks before radiotherapy, on the day of his planning computed tomography, and a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist on his first day of radiotherapy. RESULTS: In the sixth week of radiotherapy, the distance between the fiducial markers had diminished: superior to posterior-mid (from 19 to 11 mm), posterior-mid to inferior (from 19 to 15 mm), and superior to inferior (from 31 to 22 mm), so the patient was rescanned. Between the two planning computed tomographies, the prostate volume had decreased from 44.3 to 28.3 cm3 (-36%). Had the planned radiotherapy been delivered to the anatomy of the rescan, the dose to the rectal wall would have exceeded the planned dose-volume histogram constraints. However, with the patient set up to the fiducial markers, the dose-volume histogram constraints for the rectal wall and bladder wall were met throughout the course of radiotherapy. CONCLUSION: Involution of the prostate owing to concurrent androgen deprivation may cause in-migration of implanted fiducial markers and excessive dose to the rectal wall. With concurrent androgen deprivation, daily on-line set-up correction to fiducial markers can aid in safe dose escalation.

Radiotherapy patterns of practice: T1N0 glottic cancer in Ontario, Canada.

AIMS: To describe the variation in the delivery of radiation therapy to patients with T1N0 glottic cancer who were diagnosed in Ontario, Canada, between 1982 and 1995. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The patient population consisted of a random sample of 461 patients treated with curative intent from the nine cancer centres that administer radiation therapy in the province. Abstracted variables included prescribed dose (Gy) and fractionation (f), beam energy and arrangement, set-up, field size, beam modifiers, positioning and treatment interruptions. RESULTS: Thirteen prescribed dose-fractionation schemes (> or = four cases each) were identified, including 50.0-53.0 Gy/20 f (54.5%), 55.0-61.0 Gy/25 f (30.3%), and 60.0-66.0 Gy/30-33 f (7.7%). All regimens used one fraction per day, 5 days per week. An isocentric set-up was used (94.3%), with megavoltage (MV) beam energies of Cobalt-60 (87.9%), 6 MV (6.1%) and 4 MV (6.1%). A lateral parallel-opposed pair of beams was the predominant technique (76.4%) versus an anterior oblique pair (17.2%) or angle-down pair (caudally directed fields to achieve shoulder clearance, 5.7%). Wedging (96.3%) and bolus (11.8%) were used as beam-modifying devices. Predominant field-width dimensions were 5.0-6.0 cm (43.4%) and 6.5-7.0 cm (43.1%), and field length dimensions were 5.0-6.0 cm (49.5%) and 6.5-7.0 cm (35.0%). Head, neck or chin immobilisation was used in 86.9% of the cases, with 94.6% of these being custom-made. We found that radiotherapy practice was stable over time, except for a trend of increasing field size and increasing use of immobilisation. In contrast, we found practice variations among the province's cancer centres. On the basis of our findings, we defined a predominant technical practice consisting of Cobalt-60 (reflecting machine availability during the period of the study), an isocentric set-up, a lateral parallel-opposed pair technique with wedging, and supine-head neutral positioning with custom immobilisation. Forty-two per cent of the cases had one or more components of treatment that differed from this definition. CONCLUSIONS: Description of practice variation can provoke discussion about unrecognised differences in practice policies, perhaps identifying the need for better evidence, treatment guidelines, or both.

A comparison of published head and neck stage groupings in carcinomas of the tonsillar region.

BACKGROUND: The combination of T, N, and M classifications into stage groupings was designed to facilitate a number of activities including: the estimation of prognosis and the comparison of therapeutic interventions among similar groups of cases. The authors tested the UICC/AJCC 5th edition stage grouping and seven other TNM-based groupings proposed for head and neck cancer to determine their ability to meet these expectations in a specific site: carcinoma of the tonsillar region. METHODS: The authors defined four criteria to assess each stage grouping scheme: 1) The subgroups defined by T and N comprising a given group within a grouping scheme have similar survival rates (hazard consistency); 2) The survival rates differ across the groups (hazard discrimination); 3) The prediction of cure is high (outcome prediction); and 4) The distribution of patients among the groups is balanced. The authors identified or derived a measure for each criterion and the findings were summarized using a scoring system. The range of scores was from 0 (best) to 7 (worst). Data were from a retrospective chart review on 642 cases of carcinoma of the tonsillar region treated with radiotherapy for cure at the Princess Margaret Hospital from 1970-1991. None of the patients had distant metastases. RESULTS: The scheme proposed by Synderman and Wagner, which was published in Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery in 1995 (vol.112, pages 691-4), scored best at 1.2. The UICC/AJCC scheme scored worst at 6.1. The hazard consistency ranged from a 3.1% average survival difference to 6.7% across the 8 schemes. The hazard discrimination measure varied by 28% from the best to worst scheme. Prediction varied by up to almost twofold across the schemes assessed. The distribution of patients varied from expected by between 0.13% and 0.57%. CONCLUSION: UICC/AJCC stage groupings were defined without empirical investigation. When tested, this scheme did not perform as well as any of seven empirically-derived schemes the authors evaluated. The results of the current study suggest that the usefulness of the TNM system can be enhanced by optimizing the design of stage groupings through empirical investigation.

The role of computed tomography in the T classification of laryngeal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The objectives of this study were 1) to describe patterns of use of computed tomography (CT) in laryngeal carcinoma, and 2) to characterize the contribution of CT to the T classification of laryngeal carcinoma. METHODS: The study population comprised 1195 patients with laryngeal carcinoma diagnosed from 1982 through 1995 chosen randomly from the Ontario provincial cancer registry. A chart review was conducted to obtain data on each case. Patient-related, tumor-related, and health-system-related factors were analyzed to identify factors associated with the use of CT. Descriptions of clinical exams and CT reports were reviewed to see how CT information modified T classification. Actuarial local control and cause specific survival curves were plotted by clinical T classification without and with CT to evaluate stage migration. The percentage of the variance in outcome explained by T classification in a Cox analysis was used to evaluate whether the prognostic accuracy of T classification was improved with the use of information from CT. RESULTS: Patients with glottic (20.1%) and supraglottic (41.7%) carcinoma underwent CT. The use of CT increased over time in glottic and supraglottic carcinoma combined from 17.2% in 1982-5 to 33.9% in 1991-5. Computed tomography was used less often in older patients with a 16% (95% confidence interval, 5-27%) decrease in the odds of having CT with each 10-year age increment. Computed tomography use varied considerably across the cancer center regions in Ontario. Computed tomography altered the T classification in 20.2% of those patients who had CT, with most being "upstages." Stage migration due to CT was demonstrated. Using information from CT in the assignment of T classification for 27.8% of this study population did not make a significant contribution to the ability of T classification to predict outcome over the entire group. CONCLUSIONS: There is large variation in the use of CT among different age groups and regions. The ability to compare outcomes by stage across geographic areas is compromised when the use of CT varies.

Portal imaging for evaluation of daily on-line setup errors and off-line organ motion during conformal irradiation of carcinoma of the prostate.

PURPOSE: To use portal imaging to measure daily on-line setup error and off-line prostatic motion in patients treated with conformal radiotherapy to determine an optimum planning target volume (PTV) margin incorporating both setup error and organ motion. RESULTS: A total of 2549 portal images from 33 patients were acquired over the course of the study. Of these patients, 23 were analyzed for setup errors while the remaining 10 were analyzed for prostatic motion. Setup errors were characterized by standard deviations of 1.8 mm in the anterior-posterior (AP) direction and 1.4 mm in the superior-inferior (SI) direction. Displacements due to prostatic motion, with standard deviations of 5.8 mm AP and 3.3 mm SI, were found to be more significant than setup errors. CONCLUSIONS: Taking into account both setup errors and target organ motion, optimum PTV margins to ensure 95% coverage are 10.0 mm AP and 5.9 mm SI. The portal imaging protocol established in this study allows radiation therapists to accept or adjust a treatment setup based upon daily on-line image matching results. The successful localization of radiopaque fiducial markers on a significant number of portal images acquired in the study gives hope that more accurate on-line targeting verification may soon be possible through the visualization of the prostate itself as opposed to the surrounding bony structures of the pelvis.

Glottic cancer in Ontario, Canada and the SEER areas of the United States. Do different management philosophies produce different outcome profiles?

We compared the management and outcome of glottic cancer in Ontario, Canada to that in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Program areas in the United States to determine whether the greater use of primary radiotherapy with surgery reserved for salvage in Ontario was associated with similar survival and better larynx retention rates than the U.S. approach where primary surgery is used more often. Electronic, clinical and hospital data were linked to cancer registry data and supplemented by chart review where necessary. Initial treatment and survival in patients diagnosed in the SEER areas from 1988 through 1994 were compared to patients from Ontario diagnosed from 1982 through 1995. Actuarial laryngectomy rates were compared for patients over 65 at diagnosis in the two regions. Analyses were conducted over all cases and stratified by disease stage. In localized disease (T1 or T2), conservative treatment was the most common initial treatment in both regions, although total laryngectomy was used more often in SEER than Ontario (6.2% vs. 0.2%, respectively, P <.001). In advanced disease (T3 or T4), total laryngectomy was more commonly used as initial treatment in SEER (62.9% vs. 21.0% in Ontario, P < or =.001). Over all cases, the relative survival rate was 80% in Ontario at 5 years compared to 78% in SEER (P =.33). In localized disease, the relative survival rates were 4 to 5% higher in Ontario from the second year on, while in advanced disease 2 to 3% higher rates in SEER did not approach statistical significance. Actuarial laryngectomy rates at 3 years differed between the two regions, with a 4% higher rate in SEER (P =.01). In localized disease, 12.6% of Ontario patients had a laryngectomy by 3 years postdiagnosis compared to 17.9% in SEER (P =.05). In advanced disease, the rates were 63.3% and 79.2%, respectively (P =.07). There are large differences in the management of glottic cancer between the SEER areas of the U.S. and Ontario and no evidence that a policy emphasizing radiotherapy with surgery reserved for salvage is associated with worse survival. Ultimate laryngectomy rates are lower in Ontario for localized disease and may be lower for advanced disease. Conservation treatment should be used for localized disease while the treatment decision in advanced disease may be especially sensitive to patient values for voice retention versus initial cure.

Urethral carcinoma in women: results of treatment with primary radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Urethral carcinoma in women is uncommon. This study was undertaken to evaluate the role of radiotherapy in the treatment of these tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The hospital records of 34 women with primary urethral carcinoma were retrospectively reviewed. There were 15 squamous cell carcinomas, 13 transitional cell carcinomas, and six adenocarcinomas. The primary tumor was >4cm in size in eight patients, involved the proximal urethra in 19 and extended to adjacent organs in 22. Inguinal or iliac lymphadenopathy was present in nine patients. There were eight TNM stage I/II tumors, 11 stage III tumors and 15 stage IV tumors. Radiotherapy was administered only to the primary tumor in 15 patients, and to the primary tumor and regional lymph nodes in the remaining 19 patients. Brachytherapy with or without external radiation was used to treat the primary tumor in 20 patients. RESULTS: Tumor recurred in 21 patients. The 7-year actuarial overall and cause-specific survivals were 41 and 45%, respectively. Large primary tumor bulk and treatment with external beam radiation alone (no brachytherapy) were independent adverse prognostic factors for local tumor recurrence. Brachytherapy reduced the risk of local recurrence by a factor of 4.2. The beneficial effect of brachytherapy was most prominently seen in patients with bulky primary disease. Large tumor size was the only independent adverse predictor of overall disease recurrence and death from cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Radiotherapy is an effective treatment for carcinoma of the female urethra and preserves normal anatomy and function. Brachytherapy improves local tumor control, possibly as a result of the higher radiation dose that can safely be delivered.

Management and outcome of glottic cancer: a population-based comparison between Ontario, Canada and the SEER areas of the United States. Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results.

OBJECTIVE: We compared treatment practice and outcome in glottic cancer in Ontario, Canada to that in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) program areas in the United States to determine whether the Ontario emphasis on the use of delayed combined therapy was associated with similar survival and better laryngectomy-free survival than the U.S. approach, which emphasizes greater use of surgery. METHODS: Electronic, clinical, and hospital data were linked to cancer registry data. The study groups compared on survival comprised all patients diagnosed from 1982 to the end of 1991 in Ontario (2324 patients) and in the SEER areas (5715 patients). Comparisons on initial treatment, laryngectomy rates, and laryngectomy-free survival were limited to subsets of these study populations due to data availability. Initial treatment data were provided by the SEER registries in the U.S. and by the cancer clinic and hospitalization data in Ontario. Information about laryngectomies performed subsequent to initial treatment was available from Medicare hospitalization data in the U.S. and from Canadian Institute for Health Information hospitalization data in Ontario. RESULTS: Although radiotherapy was the most common initial treatment in both areas, it was used more often in Ontario (84.4% versus 63.2% in the U.S. [p < 0.001]). Relative survival was not statistically different with a relative risk comparing SEER to Ontario of 1.09, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.93, 1.29). Laryngectomy rates were similar with a relative risk of 1.01, 95% CI (0.67, 1.52), and it follows from the survival and laryngectomy rate comparisons that the laryngectomy-free survival was not statistically different (p = .95). CONCLUSIONS: There are large differences in the management of glottic cancer between the U.S. and Ontario and no corresponding differences in survival or laryngectomy-free survival. This work highlights a need for more clinical investigation into the relative merits of differing management policies in glottic cancer.

Progression detection of stage I nonseminomatous testis cancer on surveillance: implications for the followup protocol.

PURPOSE: To optimize followup in patients with stage I nonseminomatous testis cancer on surveillance we evaluated the contribution of each followup modality to the detection of progression as well as morbidity and mortality outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After orchiectomy 170 patients with clinical stage I nonseminoma were prospectively placed on a surveillance protocol. History, physical examination, serum tumor markers, abdominal and pelvic computerized tomography (CT), and chest x-ray were used for followup. The number of failures, methods and timing of progression detection, treatments required, mortality rate and subsequent contralateral primary tumors were recorded. RESULTS: The 170 surveillance patients were followed a median of 6.3 years. Within 2 years (median 6.9 months) postoperatively 48 patients (28.2%) had disease progression. History, physical examination, markers, CT and chest radiography provided the initial evidence of progression in 18 (37.5%), 34 (70.8%), 34 (70.8%), and 4 (8.3%) patients, respectively. Each modality was the only indicator of failure in 2 (4.2%), 4 (8.3%), 10 (20.8%) and 0 cases, respectively. Of the 170 patients 122 (71.8%) required no additional treatment beyond orchiectomy, 26 (15.3%) received 1 and 22 (12.9%) underwent more than 1 therapeutic modality. Only 1 patient (0.6%) died of disease. Contralateral tumors developed in 5 cases (2.9%) therapeutic a mean of 8.1 years after orchiectomy. CONCLUSIONS: In stage I nonseminoma patients, surveillance history, physical examination, tumor markers and abdominopelvic CT are necessary components of the followup protocol. Removal of routine chest x-ray from the protocol would not have changed progression detection. The initial surveillance visit must occur by 2 months postoperatively. Patients should be followed beyond 5 years and likely for life in addition to regular patient self-examination.

Prostate specific antigen levels during radical radiation therapy and the prediction of outcome in localized carcinoma of the prostate.

There has been substantial interest in the effect of radiation therapy upon serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels in patients managed by radiation therapy and their ability to predict the eventual outcome. At our institute, an observational prospective longitudinal study was begun in 1989 to identify prognostic factors for biochemical relapse from among several variables, including PSA levels measured prior to treatment, during treatment, and post-treatment, and to summarize what happens to PSA levels over the course of treatment with radical radiation therapy. A total of 142 patients with adenocarcinoma of the prostate (T1-4, N0, M0) were radically irradiated (6-7 weeks) between February 1989 and January 1991. Serum PSA levels were recorded weekly during radiation therapy in 117 patients. Of these 117, weekly PSA measurements ranged in completeness from 95 to 113 cases. A number of statistical tests were performed on the data with investigative/ exploratory intent. There were 60 biochemical relapses documented in the whole group of 142 patients, with a maximum follow-up of 4.6 years and median follow-up of 3.3 years. Of the candidate prognostic variables tested by univariate analysis, the following emerged as statistically significant (i.e. P < 0.05): each of the four pretreatment factors (absolute PSA value, dichotomous PSA (normal versus above normal), T category and Gleason score); the treatment variables namely, the end-of-treatment PSA, the slope of PSA, and the absolute change in PSA from pretreatment to the end of treatment; and, among post-treatment variables, the first follow-up PSA, the absolute change in PSA from pretreatment to first follow-up, and the return to normal of an above-normal pretreatment PSA by first follow-up. The majority of these factors were then subjected to multivariate Cox proportional hazards (PH) regression analyses. The end-of-treatment PSA and T category were consistently identified as independently statistically significant factors associated with biochemical relapse. The Gleason score was selected less consistently, and never when defined on a categorical scale. Therefore, using a Cox PH model with the variables of end-of-treatment PSA and T category, both defined on a categorical scale, we developed three prognostic groups with good, intermediate and poor prognoses (chi 2 TREND = 40.7; P < 0.0001). Their 3-year biochemical relapse-free rates, for example, were: 91%, (standard error (SE) 5%); 64% (SE 9%); and 24% (SE 6%), respectively. However, substitution of the baseline value of PSA, which was also strongly associated with outcome, and using the data from all 142 patients, provided similarly distinct prognostic groups (chi 2 TREND = 41.6; P < 0.0001), with corresponding 3-year relapse-free rates of: 92% (SE 4%); 79% (SE 7%); and 30% (SE 6%). Mean weekly PSA levels measured during treatment were found to have a negatively sloping or decreasing tendency. A statistically significant decrease in PSA occurred from pretreatment to the end of treatment (t116 = 7.5; P < 0.0001); the geometric mean of the ratio of end-of-treatment PSA to PSA at pretreatment was 0.7 (95% CI 0.6-0.8). The end-of-treatment PSA and T category emerged as independently statistically significant prognostic variables predicting biochemical relapse. Using the fitted Cox PH model with these two variables, three distinct prognostic groups were identified. The results using pretreatment PSA instead of end-of-treatment PSA produced similarly distinct prognostic groups. Mean weekly PSA levels measured during treatment exhibited a decreasing tendency, and a statistically significant decrease in PSa from pretreatment to the end of treatment was observed.

A critical review of the role of definitive radiation therapy in bladder cancer.

The role of radiation therapy in the management of bladder cancer continues to be controversial. Attention to the issue of response to treatment, instead of overall survival, ultimate local control and quality of life, has hampered progress in determining the optimal-treatment strategy for patients with bladder cancer. Although the heterogeneity of bladder cancer has been recognized for some time now, the trend has been to seek one cure for all, rather than to use the available modalities selectively and optimally. The use of continent urinary diversion has made cystectomy more acceptable, but no form of diversion is as satisfying as a natural, well functioning bladder. The case against definitive XRT has been built on the lack of total radiosensitivity of transitional cell carcinoma. It is interesting that the lack of total chemosensitivity of bladder cancer and total curability with surgery has not prevented those modalities from being widely used. The recognition of the systemic nature of invasive bladder cancer has appropriately led to increased attention to the control of systemic disease. However, this has led to, at times, compromised local therapy. The use of primary or adjuvant chemotherapy should not impede the pursuit of optimal local therapy in patients with bladder cancer with the emphasis on the optimal quality of life. In parallel, the goal of bladder preservation and improved quality of life should not overshadow the importance of local tumor control. Because metastatic bladder cancer currently is an almost universally lethal disease, we should optimize the use of effective treatment modalities to achieve modest improvements in cure rate. The idea that definitive radiation therapy has no role in the management of bladder cancer exists in the minds of those who hold strong convictions and see an alternative view to their own as being controversial. We believe that attention should not focus on this controversy but on the recognition of the reality that the best management of bladder cancer is a shared responsibility among the oncologists of all disciplines. With this recognition, clinical research toward improving outcome for patients with bladder cancer will move forward.

Results of a policy of surveillance in stage I testicular seminoma.

PURPOSE: To determine what proportion of patients with Stage I testicular seminoma will be cured with orchidectomy alone. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From August 1984 to December 1991 148 patients with Stage I testicular seminoma were entered on a prospective study of surveillance following orchidectomy. The eligibility criteria included a normal chest X ray, lymphogram, computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen and pelvis, and normal post-orchidectomy tumor markers (AFP and BHCG). Patients were followed with a clinical assessment (markers, chest X ray and CT abdomen and pelvis) at 4 to 6 monthly intervals. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 47 months (range 7-87 months), the actuarial relapse-free rate was 81% at 5 years. Twenty-three patients have relapsed with a median time to relapse of 15 months (range 2-61 months). Four patients (17%) relapsed at 4 or more years from diagnosis. Twenty-one of the 23 relapses occurred in the paraaortic lymph nodes, one patient relapsed in the mediastinum and ipsilateral inguinal nodes and one patient had an isolated ipsilateral inguinal node relapse. Nineteen patients were treated for relapse with external beam radiation therapy of which three developed a second relapse and were salvaged with chemotherapy. Four patients were treated for first relapse with chemotherapy and one developed a second relapse and died of disease. Age at diagnosis was the only prognostic factor for relapse, with patients age < or = 34 having an actuarial relapse-free rate at 5 years of 70% in contrast to a 91% relapse-free rate in those > 34 years of age. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend that surveillance in Stage I testicular seminoma should only be performed in a study setting until further data regarding the risk of late relapse and the efficacy of salvage chemotherapy is available.

Assessment of palliative response in hyperthermia.

It is important that clinical studies of hyperthermia will be able to define its contribution to palliative therapy. A variety of validated methods has been developed for assessing palliative therapy but none have been used in clinical studies of hyperthermia. In the present paper some of the methods available for the assessment of palliative therapy are reviewed. The necessary criteria for assessment of instruments for palliation, as well as the choice of method, is discussed. A simple strategy is proposed: use established methods and take advice on which to choose; selectively add relevant items, should this be necessary; use assessments made by patients as well as by clinicians; use the test instruments at least three times (before, during and after treatment), and pre-test it on a small series of patients before embarking upon a major study. It is hoped that, by drawing attention to the availability of such methods for evaluating palliation, they might prove important in more accurately evaluating the role of hyperthermia in the palliative treatment of cancer.

The use of a Markov process to simulate and assess follow-up policies for patients with malignant disease: surveillance for stage I nonseminomatous tumors of the testis.

Using a Markov process to simulate and assess surveillance policies for stage I nonseminomatous germ cell tumors, the authors analyzed costs and effectiveness for the various policies that have been used clinically. They found no real differences in effectiveness, defined as probability of surviving two years, between the policies. There were significant differences in costs. The model is used to suggest schedules that might be more cost-effective than those currently employed. The model suggests that computed tomographic scanning of the abdomen may not be essential to the effectiveness of surveillance protocols.