Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am J Prev Med ; 11(1): 40-5, 1995.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7748585

ABSTRACT

Since state Maternal and Child Health Services Block Grant applications represent the most comprehensive source of information about community and state needs assessment, policy development, and program assurance for the population of mothers and children, these documents have the potential to play a central role in state accountability to Congress and the Maternal and Child Health Bureau. To measure the validity of block grant applications as a reporting mechanism, we assessed the sensitivity of the applications from seven states to strategies for reducing infant mortality. We used the independent coding of infant mortality strategies from the Healthy Futures/Healthy Generations Program intensive evaluation as the standard. Overall, the sensitivity of the block grant applications was only 45%. Since the open-ended design of the block grant applications does not appear to reflect the extent of state activity in infant mortality reduction, a uniform application should be adopted that will facilitate clear and systematic reporting of state activities.


Subject(s)
Child Health Services/economics , Health Services Needs and Demand , Infant Mortality , Maternal Health Services/economics , Child , Child Health Services/organization & administration , Child, Preschool , Female , Financing, Organized , Humans , Infant Mortality/trends , Infant, Newborn , Maternal Health Services/organization & administration , North Carolina , Policy Making , Program Evaluation , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , United States
4.
Aust Dent J ; 20(3): 176-82, 1975 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1057906

ABSTRACT

Four methods were compared for determining the setting rate of amalgams. The resultant order of preference as a standard method was compressive strength at 30 minutes after preparation of the specimen, the time to the last transverse cut on a cylindrical specimen with a "guillotine" blade and the time to nonfracture of a ball of a amalgam with a final set Gillmore needle. A mercury absorption method was unacceptable. Alloys labelled fast and standard setting could be separated and limits between fast and standard alloys have been examined for each method.


Subject(s)
Chemistry, Physical/methods , Dental Amalgam , Absorption , Hardness Tests , Mercury , Needles , Pressure , Stress, Mechanical , Time Factors
5.
Aust Orthod J ; 2(6): 254-61, 1971 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-5287670
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...