Characterization and verification of lead thickness of commercially available lead foil tape for the measurements of lead equivalency of radio-protective shields.

PURPOSE: Radiation protective apparatus is normally specified in "millimeter" of lead equivalence. Typically, it is less than 0.5 mmPb with the exception of lead eyeglasses, which may be 0.75 mmPb equivalent. Upon discovery of commercially available lead foil tape, manufactured by 3M™ "Lead Foil Tape 421" (LFT) which is designed for industrial utility applications. We set out to determine if this LFT can, indeed, be employed as the reference lead in the evaluation of lead equivalency of various protective apparatus. METHOD: The LFT is cut to appropriate size (50 mm × 50 mm) and stacked for varying the total lead thickness for the transmission measurements. The transmission curves are obtained following the geometry spelled out in ASTM Designation F3094-14 standards. The radiation beam qualities corresponding to modern cardiovascular angiography equipment in the range of 60~120 kVp, in increments of 10 kVp, and in combination with the spectral shaping filters of 0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.6 and 0.9 mmCu were employed for characterization of the lead foil tape. The transmission data of lead pieces with known thicknesses (1/64", 1/32" and 3/64") are superimposed on the lead foil tape transmission curves to validate that the 3M™ LFT is indeed usable as 0.1 mm lead. RESULTS: The transmission ratio (data points) of lead pieces with known thicknesses at various radiation beam qualities mentioned above, fall right onto the transmission curves of 3M™ LFT with better than 2% accuracy. Therefore, it is indeed behaving like 0.1 mm thick lead sheet, based on the superimposed transmission curves. The 3M™ "Lead Foil Tape 421" is employed as the reference lead for evaluation of radiation protective apparatus at this institution. Verification of lead protective apparatus with unknown lead equivalence can now be determined with a high accuracy and certainty.

Evaluation and verification of a simplified lead equivalency measurement method.

PURPOSE: This technical note presents an inexpensive tool and method for determining lead equivalency using digital radiography x-ray equipment. METHODS: A test tool was developed using commercially available lead tape (3M™ Lead Foil Tape 421). The test tool consisted of nine varying lead thick squares arranged in a larger square (0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, and 1.0 mm). It was imaged on a DR plate with a digital portable x-ray unit across a range of energies (60-120 kVp) and two beam filtrations. Lead equivalency was determined by using the linear relationship between dose to the detector and pixel values in the raw images. The lead equivalency of the tape was validated using known lead thicknesses (physically measured with caliper). Additional lead equivalency measurements were made for protective eyewear, a thyroid shield, and a lead apron. RESULTS: The test tool and method measured the two known lead thicknesses to be -9.7% to 7.1% different from the actual values across the range of energies under normal x-ray beam conditions and under a 1-mm copper filtered x-ray beam. The additional lead equivalency measurements of radiation protection apparel across energies ranged from -6% to 20% for both beam conditions when compared with the values provided by the manufacturer. CONCLUSION: This work validates the test tool and methodology as an inexpensive alternative to checking the lead equivalency of radiation protection apparel in a clinical setting. The methodology is equipment independent with a few prerequisites.

Evaluation of lead equivalence of radiation protection apparatuses as a function of tube potential and spectral shaping filter.

PURPOSE: This study aims to evaluate the lead equivalence (LE) of radiation protective apparatuses under various combinations of tube potentials and spectral shaping filter. METHOD: In this study, the commercially available 3M™ Lead Foil Tape 421, with nominal lead thickness of 0.1 mm, was employed to determine the LE of four different radiation protective apparatuses. The LE of protective apparatus was determined by utilizing the X-ray transmission curves obtained with the lead foil tape at 60-120 kVp in combination with the spectral shaping filters of 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.6, and 0.9 mmCu. The experimental setup and test method, for the transmission measurements with narrow beam geometry, was performed in accordance to ASTM Designation F2547-18 Standards. All measurements were obtained using cardiovascular interventional angiography system. RESULTS: A much larger discrepancies between the measured LE and stated (nominal) LE were observed at low tube potential (<70 kVp) for non-lead protective apparatus. At higher tube potentials (>80 kVp) and thicker spectral shaping filters, the measured LE appears to be more consistent with the manufacturer specified nominal thickness for the protective apparatus investigated. On the other hand, for the lead protective eyeglasses, the measured lead equivalence of both the lead side shield and the lens of eyeglasses (0.38 and 0.85 mmPb respectively) are consistent across all tube voltage. CONCLUSION: The conventional specification of LE without considering spectral shaping filter is a valid measure for tube voltages at and above 80 kVp. The measured LE generally exceed the specifications. The difference is most significant at lower tube potentials, and especially with thicker spectral shaping filters. At higher voltages (>100 kVp), the measured LE and the nominal LE are in good agreement with each other irrespective of the spectral shaping filter thickness.