Phase I study of Doxil and vinorelbine in metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Vinorelbine and Doxil (liposomal doxorubicin) are active chemotherapeutic agents in metastatic breast cancer. A phase I study was designed to evaluate combination therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty women with metastatic breast cancer were enrolled. Dose-limiting toxicity was determined through a dose escalation scheme, and defined for the first treatment cycle, only. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed during the first cycle of treatment. RESULTS: In the first cohort of Doxil 30 mg/m2 day 1 and vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 days 1 and 8, patients experienced severe neutropenia. Vinorelbine administration was changed thereafter to days 1 and 15 of each cycle. Dose limiting toxicity was observed at Doxil 50 mg/m2 and vinorelbine 25 mg/m2. Doxil 40 mg/m2 and vinorelbine 30 mg/m2 was defined as the maximally tolerated dose. Few toxicities (principally neutro penia) were seen at this dose level, with the notable absence of significant nausea, vomiting, or alopecia. Though 63% of patients had received prior anthracycline-based chemotherapy, only one patient developed grade 2 cardiac toxicity. Pharmacokinetic studies revealed prolonged exposure to high doxorubicin concentrations for several days following Doxil administration. CONCLUSIONS: Combination chemotherapy with Doxil and vinorelbine affords treatment with two active drugs in women with metastatic breast cancer, and appears to have a favorable toxicity profile. A schedule of Doxil 40 mg/m2 day 1 and vinorelbine 30 mg/m2 days 1 and 15 given every 28 days is recommended for phase II studies.

Complications of axillary lymph node dissection for carcinoma of the breast: a report based on a patient survey.

BACKGROUND: Axillary lymph node dissection is commonly performed as part of the primary management of breast carcinoma. Its value in patient management, however, has recently been questioned. Few studies exist that document long term complications. METHODS: Four hundred thirty-two patients with Stage I or II breast carcinoma who were free of recurrence 2-5 years after surgery were identified. A cross-sectional survey was conducted to determine the prevalence of long term symptoms and complications as perceived by the patient, and patient and treatment factors that may have predicted complications were determined. Three hundred thirty of the 432 (76%) completed a mailed, self-administered questionnaire. In addition, the medical records of the 330 patients were reviewed. Patient and treatment factors were analyzed with logistic regression. RESULTS: Numbness was reported by 35% of patients at the time of the survey. Pain was noted in 30%, arm swelling in 15%, and limitation of arm movement in 8%. Eight percent reported episodes of infection or inflammation at some point since the diagnosis of breast carcinoma. The majority of symptoms were mild and interfered minimally with daily activities. Younger age (P=0.001) was associated with more frequent reporting of pain. Numbness was more common in younger patients (P=0.004) as well as in those with a history of smoking (P=0.012). There was a positive association of limitation of arm motion with adjuvant tamoxifen therapy (P=0.016). Arm swelling was associated with both younger age (P=0.004) and greater body surface area (P=0.008). Radiation therapy was associated with a higher frequency of infection or inflammation in the arm and/or breast (P=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Mild symptoms, especially pain and numbness, are common 2-5 years after axillary lymph node dissection. The frequency of inflammation or infection in patients treated with radiation to the breast or chest wall after an axillary lymph node dissection may be greater than previously appreciated. Severe complications or symptoms that have a major impact on daily activities are uncommon. These findings should help health care providers and their patients with breast carcinoma weigh the pros and cons of axillary lymph node dissection.

A review of hereditary breast cancer: from screening to risk factor modification.

The identification of genetic mutations thought to be directly responsible for the development of breast cancer represents a major advance in our understanding of this disease. Mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 are thought to be responsible for the majority of inherited breast cancer. Although these mutations account for approximately 5% of breast cancer cases, the identification of these genes will have a profound impact on the way patients and their physicians view breast cancer risk. Genetic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations is already available. Interpreting results of genetic tests for these mutations is problematic and the clinical management of women carrying these gene mutations is far from straightforward. The purpose of this paper is to review recent developments in the genetic aspects of breast cancer, including genetic testing, to critically review risk factor modification, and to discuss screening and potential prophylactic measures.

Pharmacokinetics and clinical impact of all-trans retinoic acid in metastatic breast cancer: a phase II trial.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this trial was to evaluate tumor cytoreduction by all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) in patients with metastatic breast cancer and to characterize the initial pharmacokinetics of this agent. METHODS: The study was a single institution, phase II study. The treatment regimen consisted of ATRA administered orally at a dose of 50 mg/m2 three times a day for 14 consecutive day of a 21-day cycle. Cycles were repeated until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or patient withdrawal. Plasma samples were obtained following the first dose of ATRA for pharmacokinetic analysis. RESULTS: A total of 17 patients with metastatic breast cancer were enrolled in the study, and 14 completed at least one cycle of therapy and were evaluable for response. One patient achieved a partial response in soft tissue of 4 months duration. Three patients had stable disease for 4, 2, and 2 months duration. The remainder had progressive disease. ATRA was reasonably well tolerated. Pharmacokinetic analysis revealed a high degree of interpatient variability in systemic exposure following the initial dose of ATRA. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude, that in the dose and schedule tested, ATRA does not have significant activity in patients with hormone-refractory, metastatic breast cancer. Future studies should focus on more intensive investigation of those individuals with very high or low ATRA initial systemic exposure in the hope of expanding our understanding of ATRA's clinical pharmacology, ultimately leading to improved efficacy.