Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Clin Exp Dermatol ; 47(6): 1174-1178, 2022 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35150003

ABSTRACT

Atopic eczema and psoriasis are chronic, inflammatory dermatoses that can significantly affect the quality of life of those affected. Although both diseases are common, they rarely occur together. Severe psoriasis can be treated with biologic therapies targeting specific cytokine pathways involved in disease pathogenesis. There are reports of paradoxical eczema developing in biologic-treated patients with psoriasis, sometimes necessitating treatment discontinuation and thus leading to poor disease control. This retrospective case series identified 36 such events occurring in 23 patients. All currently available biologic classes were implicated. Eosinophilia (n = 19) and elevated serum IgE (n = 3) were identified in some cases. Treatment strategies included no treatment, topical corticosteroids, broad-acting systemic agents, and discontinuation or switch of biologic therapy. Two patients had persistent eczema and psoriasis despite discontinuation of all biologic therapies.


Subject(s)
Biological Products , Eczema , Psoriasis , Biological Products/adverse effects , Eczema/chemically induced , Humans , Psoriasis/pathology , Quality of Life , Retrospective Studies
2.
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb) ; 11(1): 149-160, 2021 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33315229

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Dupilumab is a biologic therapy approved for treatment of moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AD). Our objective was to assess the real-world effectiveness, safety and laboratory monitoring practices for dupilumab in a tertiary centre. METHODS: A retrospective review of medical records of all patients receiving dupilumab between September 2017 and October 2019 was undertaken. Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) were collected at weeks 0, 12-16 and 26-30. Data on laboratory tests undertaken for dupilumab screening and monitoring were also collected. RESULTS: At 12-16 weeks, 58.9% and 37.3% of patients achieved ≥ EASI 75 and ≥ EASI 90, respectively (n = 156). Ninety-four patients underwent further analysis at weeks 26-30 with those achieving ≥ EASI 75 increasing from 61.7% (12-16 weeks) to 75.31%, and EASI 90 increasing from 35.8% (12-16 weeks) to 49.8%. The most common side effects were eye symptoms occurring in 43.1% of patients, with 16.3% developing conjunctivitis. The mean treatment duration was 255 days, during which an average of three sets of blood tests were performed (n = 149). Of all laboratory abnormalities recorded, 24% started after initiation of dupilumab, and 93% were classified as 'mild'. Dupilumab was not documented as causative in any of the cases, nor was treatment stopped on account of laboratory abnormalities. CONCLUSION: Dupilumab provides an effective and safe treatment option for patients with AD. Clinical response continued to improve past 16 weeks in this real-world population. No laboratory abnormalities were felt to be secondary to dupilumab; screening and monitoring tests did not influence dupilumab prescribing.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...