A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-finding trial of a long-acting formulation of octreotide in promoting weight loss in obese adults with insulin hypersecretion.

OBJECTIVE: To compare changes in weight in obese patients who received long-acting octreotide (octreotide LAR) at one of three dose levels (20, 40, or 60 mg) or placebo over 6 months and to identify the lowest dose of octreotide LAR that safely achieved optimal weight loss. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of octreotide LAR at three dose levels. PATIENTS: A total of 172 adults (28 men and 144 women) with at least moderate obesity (body mass index (BMI) range 30-65 kg/m2) and evidence of insulin hypersecretion were enrolled. Patients were predominantly either Caucasian (50.0%) or African American (45.3%). The mean age (38 +/- 11 year), weight (110.7 +/- 23 kg), and BMI (39.8 +/- 6.5 kg/m2) were similar across the four treatment groups. MEASUREMENTS: Efficacy measures included weight, BMI, fasting serum glucose; triglycerides; percentage of total body fat and abdominal fat as measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; skin fold thickness; waist-to-hip circumference; leptin; percentage of carbohydrates, fat, and protein ingested; nutritional evaluation (including dietary analysis--3-day food record); quality of life (QoL; using the Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite); Beck Depression Inventory; and Carbohydrate Craving Questionnaire. Safety measures included medical history, vital signs, physical examinations, hematology, blood chemistries, thyroid function tests, hemoglobin A1c, gallbladder ultrasound, electrocardiograms, and adverse events. RESULTS: After 6 months of treatment, patients receiving 40 or 60 mg of octreotide LAR experienced statistically significant weight loss compared to baseline, with mean differences from placebo in percent weight change of -1.98 and -1.87%, respectively. This finding was accompanied by statistically significant mean decreases in BMI compared to baseline, that is, a mean decrease of 0.73 and 0.79 kg/m2 for the 40 and 60 mg treatment arms, respectively. The observed weight loss was progressive during the 6-month treatment in the two higher dose groups. The lowest dose to reach statistical significance in weight loss after 6 months' treatment was 40 mg. Post hoc analysis revealed a 3.5-3.8% weight loss at month 6 in the two higher dose groups among Caucasian patients having insulin secretion greater than the median of the cohort, defined as CIR(gp) (corrected insulin response at the glucose peak) > or = 1.43. There were no statistically significant changes in QoL scores, body fat, leptin concentration, Beck Depression Inventory, or macronutrient intake. Mean changes of blood glucose AUC(0-180 min) during an oral glucose tolerance test in patients taking octreotide LAR were 39-40 mg/dl h higher than those on placebo. A total of 7-21% of the patients taking octreotide LAR reached a 5% or greater decrease in body weight from Baseline, compared to 11% for the placebo group. This was not statistically significant. The most common adverse events included diarrhea, headache, cholelithiasis, nausea, and abdominal pain. CONCLUSION: Octreotide LAR given at 40 or 60 mg resulted in statistically significant weight loss. A post hoc analysis stratifying patients by race and CIR(gp) indicated that Caucasian patients with the greater degree of insulin hypersecretion appeared to derive the most benefit from treatment. The observed safety profile was consistent with the known effects of octreotide from previous studies.

Treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis with high-dose oral terbinafine: a double blind, placebo-controlled study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate antifungal terbinafine in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter pilot study. METHODS: Fifty-three adults with chronic rhinosinusitis received terbinafine 625 mg/day (n = 25) or placebo (n = 28) once daily for 6 weeks. Sinus secretions were collected at screening for mycology. Computed tomography was graded for extent of opacification at baseline and at week 6 using a modification of the Lund-Mackay scoring system. Patients recorded rhinosinusitis symptoms on a visual analogue scale and completed the Rhinosinusitis Disability Index. RESULTS: Positive fungal cultures were found in 41 of 53 patients (17 terbinafine, 24 placebo). (Two subjects from the Terbinafine group and one subject from the control group had no week 6 data). The mean opacification scores pre- and posttreatment for the entire study group improved from 24.2 to 22.5 in placebo (n = 26) and from 26.3 to 24.2 in terbinafine group (n = 23). The least squares means for percent change from baseline (SE) were -6.0 (8.7) for placebo compared with -7.2 (8.1) for terbinafine; 95% confidence interval for treatment difference (-18.9, 21.1); P = .91. Results were similar when only patients with positive fungal cultures were evaluated in the efficacy analysis. Investigator therapeutic evaluations and sinus symptom scores were not significantly different between the two groups at baseline or at treatment completion. CONCLUSION: Treatment with terbinafine failed to improve the symptoms or radiographic appearance of chronic rhinosinusitis even when nasal irrigation samples were positive for fungus on culture. One consideration is that the fungi isolated were not a major pathologic factor in this cohort. It is also possible that, even at high dose, terbinafine may not have maintained therapeutic levels in the nasal secretions.