ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Multiple registries have reported that >40% of high-risk atrial fibrillation patients are not taking oral anticoagulants. The purpose of our study was to determine the presence or absence of active atrial fibrillation and CHA2DS2-VASc (Congestive heart failure, Hypertension, Age ≥75 y, Diabetes mellitus, prior Stroke [or transient ischemic attack or thromboembolism], Vascular disease, Age 65-74 y, Sex category) risk factors to accurately identify high-risk atrial fibrillation (CHA2DS2-VASc ≥2) patients requiring oral anticoagulants and the magnitude of the anticoagulant treatment gap. METHODS: We retrospectively adjudicated 6514 patients with atrial fibrillation documented by at least one of: billing diagnosis, electronic medical record encounter diagnosis, electronic medical record problem list, or electrocardiogram interpretation. RESULTS: After review, 4555/6514 (69.9%) had active atrial fibrillation, while 1201 had no documented history of atrial fibrillation and 758 had a history of atrial fibrillation that was no longer active. After removing the 1201 patients without a confirmed atrial fibrillation diagnosis, oral anticoagulant use in high-risk patients increased to 71.1% (P < .0001 compared with 62.9% at baseline). Oral anticoagulant use increased to 79.7% when the 758 inactive atrial fibrillation patients were also eliminated from the analysis (P < .0001 compared with baseline). In the active high-risk atrial fibrillation group, there was no significant difference in the use of oral anticoagulants between men (80.7%) and women (78.8%) with a CHA2DS2-VASc ≥2, or in women with a CHA2DS2-VASc ≥3 (79.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Current registries and health system health records with unadjudicated diagnoses over-report the number of high-risk atrial fibrillation patients not taking oral anticoagulants. Expert adjudication identifies a smaller treatment gap than previously described.
Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Factor Xa Inhibitors/administration & dosage , False Positive Reactions , Risk Assessment/methods , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Atrial Fibrillation/diagnosis , Atrial Fibrillation/physiopathology , Blood Coagulation/drug effects , Factor Xa Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Registries/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment/standards , Risk Assessment/statistics & numerical data , Risk Factors , Sex Factors , Thromboembolism/drug therapy , Thromboembolism/prevention & controlABSTRACT
The relation between the etiology of cardiomyopathy and the function of the right ventricle (RV) has not been well described in the current era of 3-dimensional cardiac imaging. New advances in cardiac imaging with computed tomography (CT) have allowed accurate measurements of ejection fraction (EF), often a challenging task considering the unique RV shape. We evaluated 130 patients at the Loma Linda Veterans Affairs Healthcare System with cardiomyopathy and a left ventricular (LV) EF ≤ 40%. Etiology of cardiomyopathy was determined by CT angiography as ischemic (n = 56) or nonischemic (n = 74). RV volumes and RVEF were calculated based on 3-dimensional data set from CT images. Baseline LVEF was similar with a mean LVEF of 28% (± 6%) in the ischemic group and 28% (± 9%) in the nonischemic group (p = 0.46). RV function and volumes were moderately decreased in both cohorts, without significant difference between the groups (mean RVEF 34 ± 11% in ischemic group and 32 ± 10% in nonischemic group, p = 0.26). In conclusion, most patients with LV dysfunction also have RV dysfunction. The degree of RV dysfunction is not dependent on the etiology of cardiomyopathy.
