ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Insertional Achilles tendinopathy is a common overuse disorder affecting the foot and ankle that can lead to the development of a Haglund's deformity with chronicity, a retrocalcaneal exostosis that forms at the Achilles insertion site, further increasing pain and dysfunction. PRESENTATION OF CASE: We report a case of a healthy, 35-40-year-old male with chronic left-sided insertional Achilles pain beginning in early adolescence. Physical exam demonstrated bilateral prominences on the posterior aspect of both heels, exquisitely tender on the left and without range of motion deficits. Imaging demonstrated a large calcific ossicle clearly within the tendinous insertion of the Achilles onto the left calcaneus. He underwent surgical intervention to provide pain relief and restore function. He exhibited full recovery post-operatively and has now returned to full functional activities. DISCUSSION: Given his symptom pathogenesis and progression, this patient may likely have suffered from chronic insertional Achilles tendinopathy due to an accessory ossicle that we believe was congenital. Current literature describes an additional secondary ossification center that appears over the dorsal, posterosuperior surface of the calcaneus. We suspect that there was a lapse in fusion at this additional ossification center that contributed to his pathological condition. CONCLUSION: This case report presents a unique occurrence of Achilles tendinopathy likely due to an accessory ossicle of congenital etiology. This highlights the importance of investigating the prevalence of this condition in those with chronic insertional Achilles tendinopathy, thus providing meaningful insight in considering effective treatment modalities in the management of these patients.
ABSTRACT
Joint-spanning external fixation in acute ankle trauma is a means to provide temporary stability and restoration of length, alignment, and articular congruency. This allows for soft-tissue consolidation before definitive fixation to decrease the risk of wound complications. Traction is commonly used during definitive fixation to aid in fracture reduction and to maintain reduction during placement of internal hardware. Ankle arthroscopy for ankle fractures is also becoming increasingly popular to identify and treat intra-articular injury and uses traction for visual assistance and increased working space for instruments. We present a technique that uses a previously placed calcaneus external fixation pin and the TRIMANO (Arthrex, Naples, FL) external positioning arm to apply skeletal traction during arthroscopic and open definitive fixation procedures. This technique is extremely simple, can be used in both the supine and prone positions, and can be used during arthroscopic and open procedures.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/AIM: Nursemaid's elbow usually occurs in young children when longitudinal traction is placed on the arm. Several manipulative maneuvers have been described, although, the most effective treatment technique is yet unclear. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the two most commonly performed maneuvers (supination-flexion and hyperpronation) in the treatment of nursemaid's elbow. METHODS: A literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases to identify randomized controlled trials comparing supination-flexion and hyperpronation. Data were extracted and pooled independently by two authors. Methodological quality assessment of included studies was performed. Meta-analysis was performed using a fixed-effect model in case of homogeneity across studies, and using a random-effect model in case of heterogeneity. Heterogeneity was calculated with the χ2 test and inconsistency in study effects across trials was quantified by I2 values. RESULTS: Seven randomized trials, including 701 patients (62% female), were included. A total of 350 patients were treated with the hyperpronation maneuver versus 351 patients who underwent the supination-flexion maneuver. Meta-analysis showed that hyperpronation was more effective than supination-flexion (risk ratio, 0.34; 95% confidence interval, 0.23 to 0.49; I2, 35%). The absolute risk difference between maneuvers was 26% in favor of hyperpronation, resulting in a number needed to treat of 4 patients. Trials lacked blinding of assessors and universal pain measures. CONCLUSIONS: Hyperpronation was more effective in terms of success rate and seems to be less painful compared to the supination-flexion maneuver in children with nursemaid's elbow.
