Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Am J Public Health ; 89(12): 1841-6, 1999 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10589313

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study was done to compare risk factors for HIV/STDs in women who reported having had sex with both men and women and women who reported having had sex with men only. METHODS: Female participants in a multisite, randomized HIV/STD prevention study in the Seattle area reported both having had sex with a man in the 3 months before and having at least 1 risk factor for HIV/STDs during the year before the study. Of these women, 38% who reported ever having had sex with a woman were compared with those who reported having had sex with men only. RESULTS: Women who had had sex with both men and women were more likely than women who had had sex with men only to report drug use in the 3 months before the study, a greater lifetime number of male partners, a sex partner who had had sex with a prostitute, an earlier age at sexual debut, and forced sexual contact (P < .01 for all comparisons). Women who had had sex with both men and women had a mean of 3.2 of these 5 risk factors, vs 2.1 among women who had had sex with men only (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Women who had had sex with both men and women were more likely than women who had had sex with men only to engage in multiple risk behaviors. Health workers should be aware of bisexual experience among women, since this may be a marker for multiple risk behaviors for HIV/STDs.


Subject(s)
Bisexuality/statistics & numerical data , HIV Infections/epidemiology , Heterosexuality/statistics & numerical data , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/epidemiology , Substance-Related Disorders/complications , Adult , Analysis of Variance , Condoms , Female , HIV Infections/prevention & control , Humans , Risk , Risk-Taking , Sexual Partners , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/prevention & control , Substance Abuse, Intravenous , United States/epidemiology
2.
J Adolesc Health ; 21(5): 309-17, 1997 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9358294

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to identify the factors that contributed to intervention effectiveness in acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) prevention projects targeting youth. METHODS: Eleven AIDS prevention projects funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation whose target populations consisted of at least 60% youth were studied. A blended methodology resulted in quantitative data (i.e., survey responses) from all 11 projects supplemented with qualitative data (i.e., open-ended interviews) drawn from in-depth site visits to six projects. RESULTS: Projects reported using a mean of 16.6 intervention activities (selected from a list of 30). Six activities were used by all 11 projects. Small group discussions were rated as one of three most effective activities by 72.7% of the projects that used them. Project staff identified three elements of effective interventions: involvement of peer educators, recognition of the role of adults (e.g., parents, teachers), and use of structured settings to gain access to the target population (e.g., schools, clubs). CONCLUSIONS: The most powerful strategies described by project staff for reaching adolescents at risk for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) transmission also bring considerable challenges. Opportunity costs associated with using peer educators, gatekeeper support, and structured settings may include limited control of the message, impaired credibility, and failure to reach those youth at greatest risk of HIV infection, respectively. Health educators will do well to consider the advantages and disadvantages of these factors when developing, implementing, and evaluating AIDS prevention programs for youth.


Subject(s)
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/prevention & control , Primary Prevention/methods , Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/transmission , Adolescent , Data Collection/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Peer Group , Preventive Health Services , Program Evaluation , Puerto Rico , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States
3.
Am J Community Psychol ; 24(2): 295-310, 1996 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8795263

ABSTRACT

Enculturation is the process by which individuals learn about and identify with their ethnic minority culture. It is distinguished from acculturation which refers to the process by which an ethnic minority individual is assimilated into the majority culture. Three studies with Native American youths are reported that describe the development of a measure of enculturation for Native American youths. Development of a measure of enculturation provides a foundation upon which to build a body of literature that focuses on strengths in a youth's life rather than on deficits. Results of the first study (n = 120), a confirmatory factor analysis, indicated that cultural affinity, native American identity, and family involvement in traditional activities adequately represent the construct of ecnulturation. The study also provides some convergent validity for this interpretation. The second study examines factor invariance for enculturation among youths with data from over 2 years (n = 69). The factor structure was similar across time. The third study replicates the factor structure and validity analyses with a new sample (n = 42). Usefulness of the measure for assessing protective factors and stressing ethnicity over simple assessment of race categories is discussed.


Subject(s)
Culture , Indians, North American/psychology , Psychometrics , Social Identification , Adolescent , Child , Factor Analysis, Statistical , Humans , Midwestern United States , Reproducibility of Results , Surveys and Questionnaires
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...