Identifying Risk Factors for Preexisting or Developing Low Back Pain in Youth, High School, and Collegiate Lacrosse Players Using 3-Dimensional Motion Analysis.

Background: Low back pain (LBP) is a common condition that can affect athletes of all ages. The risk factors for LBP onset and worsening associated with the lacrosse shooting motion are not yet known. Purpose: To identify training and biomechanical factors associated with preexisting LBP and development of LBP over 6 months in youth, high school, and collegiate lacrosse players. Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A total of 128 lacrosse players were enrolled in this study between January 2016 and January 2019. Player characteristics, lacrosse experience, and participation in other sports were self-reported. At baseline and 2-, 4-, and 6-month follow-ups, the players self-rated the presence and severity of LBP using a numeric pain rating scale (0-10 points). Participants were grouped according to LBP symptoms: no LBP at any time point (n = 102), preexisting LBP (n = 17), or developed LBP within the 6-month period (n = 9). The lacrosse shooting motion was captured via 3-dimensional motion analysis, and kinematic and kinetic variables were recorded. A Low Back Stress Index was used to estimate lumbar stress as a function of pelvic acceleration at the time of maximum lateral trunk lean during the shot. Univariate analyses of covariance and logistic regression models were used to address study aims. Results: Compared with the no-LBP group, the preexisting LBP group demonstrated 13.9% to 22.9% lower maximum angular velocities at the pelvis, trunk, and shoulders in the transverse plane (P < .05), 19.3% less collective pelvis-shoulder rotation in the transverse plane (P = .015), and 4.5% more knee flexion excursion (P = .063). The developed-LBP group produced 2.3% to 11.1% higher angular velocities in the pelvis, trunk, and shoulder and generated maximum pelvic acceleration values 36% to 42% higher than the remaining groups (P < .05 for both). Mean Low Back Stress Index values were not statistically significant among the groups (no LBP: 12,504 ± 13,076 deg2/s2; preexisting LBP: 8808 ± 10,174 deg2/s2; developed LBP: 19,389 ± 13,590 deg2/s2; P = .157). Conclusion: Preexisting LBP was associated with significantly restricted motion of the pelvis, trunk, and shoulders during a lacrosse shot. Excessive pelvic acceleration may be related to the development of LBP in lacrosse players.

Exploring relationships among multi-disciplinary assessments for knee joint health in service members with traumatic unilateral lower limb loss: a two-year longitudinal investigation.

Motivated by the complex and multifactorial etiologies of osteoarthritis, here we use a comprehensive approach evaluating knee joint health after unilateral lower limb loss. Thirty-eight male Service members with traumatic, unilateral lower limb loss (mean age = 38 yr) participated in a prospective, two-year longitudinal study comprehensively evaluating contralateral knee joint health (i.e., clinical imaging, gait biomechanics, physiological biomarkers, and patient-reported outcomes); seventeen subsequently returned for a two-year follow-up visit. For this subset with baseline and follow-up data, outcomes were compared between timepoints, and associations evaluated between values at baseline with two-year changes in tri-compartmental joint space. Upon follow-up, knee joint health worsened, particularly among seven Service members who presented at baseline with no joint degeneration (KL = 0) but returned with evidence of degeneration (KL ≥ 1). Joint space narrowing was associated with greater patellar tilt (r[12] = 0.71, p = 0.01), external knee adduction moment (r[13] = 0.64, p = 0.02), knee adduction moment impulse (r[13] = 0.61, p = 0.03), and CTX-1 concentration (r[11] = 0.83, p = 0.001), as well as lesser KOOSSport and VR-36General Health (r[16] = - 0.69, p = 0.01 and r[16] = - 0.69, p = 0.01, respectively). This longitudinal, multi-disciplinary investigation highlights the importance of a comprehensive approach to evaluate the fast-progressing onset of knee osteoarthritis, particularly among relatively young Service members with lower limb loss.

Investigating post-mild traumatic brain injury neuromuscular function and musculoskeletal injury risk: A protocol for a prospective, observational, case-controlled study in service members and active individuals.

INTRODUCTION: Musculoskeletal injury (MSKI) risk is increased following mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). Increased MSKI risk is present up to 2 years following post-mTBI return-to-duty/activity relative to both non-mTBI peers and to their pre-mTBI selves across a range of populations, including military service members, and professional, college and high school athletes. Despite the well documented increased post-mTBI MSKI risk, the underlying neuromuscular mechanisms contributing to this increased risk have yet to be definitively determined. A number of potential mechanisms have been suggested (eg, aberrant kinematics, dynamic balance impairments, lower voluntary muscle activation), but none have been confirmed with a comprehensive, prospective study. This study aims to: (1) elucidate the neuromuscular control mechanisms following mTBI that contribute to increased MSKI risk, and (2) prospectively track patient outcomes (up to 12 months; MSKI occurrences and patient-reported outcomes (PRO)). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a multicentre prospective, case-matched control observational study to identify deficiencies in neuromuscular function following mTBI that may contribute to increased MSKI risk. Participants (aim to recruit 148, complete data collection on 124) will be classified into two cohorts; mTBI and control. All participants will undergo longitudinal (initial, 6 weeks post-initial, 12 weeks post-initial) comprehensive three-dimensional biomechanical (jump-landing; single leg hop; cut; gait), neuromuscular (interpolated twitch technique, muscular ramp contraction) and sensory (joint repositioning; light touch sensation) assessments to elucidate the underlying neuromuscular control mechanisms post-mTBI that may contribute to increased MSKI. Occurrences of MSKI and PROs (National Institutes of Health Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System: Physical Function, Pain Interference, Depression, Anxiety; Brief Resilience Scale; Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia), will be tracked monthly (up to 1 year) via electronic data capture platforms. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study received approval from the Walter Reed National Military Medical Center Institutional Review Board. Results will be made available to the associated funding agency and other researchers via conference proceedings and journal articles. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05122728.

A Comprehensive, Multidisciplinary Assessment for Knee Osteoarthritis Following Traumatic Unilateral Lower Limb Loss in Service Members.

INTRODUCTION: Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a primary source of long-term disability and decreased quality of life (QoL) in service members (SM) with lower limb loss (LL); however, it remains difficult to preemptively identify and mitigate the progression of KOA and KOA-related symptoms. The objective of this study was to explore a comprehensive cross-sectional evaluation, at the baseline of a prospective study, for characterizing KOA in SM with traumatic LL. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-eight male SM with traumatic unilateral LL (23 transtibial and 15 transfemoral), 9.5 ± 5.9 years post-injury, were cross-sectionally evaluated at initial enrollment into a prospective, longitudinal study utilizing a comprehensive evaluation to characterize knee joint health, functionality, and QoL in SM with LL. Presences of medial, lateral, and/or patellofemoral articular degeneration within the contralateral knee were identified via magnetic resonance imaging(for medically eligible SM; Kellgren-Lawrence Grade [n = 32]; and Outerbridge classification [OC; n = 22]). Tri-planar trunk and pelvic motions, knee kinetics, along with temporospatial parameters, were quantified via full-body gait evaluation and inverse dynamics. Concentrations of 26 protein biomarkers of osteochondral tissue degradation and inflammatory activity were identified via serum immunoassays. Physical function, knee symptoms, and QoL were collected via several patient reported outcome measures. RESULTS: KOA was identified in 12 of 32 (37.5%; KL ≥ 1) SM with LL; however, 16 of 22 SM presented with patellofemoral degeneration (72.7%; OC ≥ 1). Service members with versus without KOA had a 26% reduction in the narrowest medial tibiofemoral joint space. Biomechanically, SM with versus without KOA walked with a 24% wider stride width and with a negative correlation between peak knee adduction moments and minimal medial tibiofemoral joint space. Physiologically, SM with versus without KOA exhibited elevated concentrations of pro-inflammatory biomarker interleukin-7 (+180%), collagen breakdown markers collagen II cleavage (+44%), and lower concentrations of hyaluronic acid (-73%) and bone resorption biomarker N-telopeptide of Type 1 Collagen (-49%). Lastly, there was a negative correlation between patient-reported contralateral knee pain severity and patient-reported functionality and QoL. CONCLUSIONS: While 37.5% of SM with LL had KOA at the tibiofemoral joint (KL ≥ 1), 72.7% of SM had the presence of patellofemoral degeneration (OC ≥ 1). These findings demonstrate that the patellofemoral joint may be more susceptible to degeneration than the medial tibiofemoral compartment following traumatic LL.

Lumbopelvic coordination while walking in service members with unilateral lower limb loss: Comparing variabilities derived from vector coding and continuous relative phase.

BACKGROUND: Continuous relative phase and vector coding are two common approaches for quantifying lumbopelvic coordination and variability. Evaluating the application of such methodologies to the lower limb loss population is important for better understanding reported asymmetrical movement dynamics of the lumbopelvic region. RESEARCH QUESTION: How do coordination variabilities derived from trunk-pelvic coupling angles and continuous relative phases compare among individuals with and without unilateral lower limb loss walking at self-selected speeds? METHODS: Full-body kinematics were obtained from thirty-eight males with unilateral lower limb loss (23 transtibial and 15 transfemoral) and fifteen males without limb loss while walking along a 15 m walkway. Coordination variabilities were derived from trunk-pelvic coupling angles and continuous relative phases and compared using a multivariate approach, as well as in unilateral outcome measures between control participants and participants with lower limb loss. RESULTS: Overall, tri-planar measures of continuous relative phase variability were 19-43% larger compared to coupling angle variabilities for individuals without limb loss and individuals with transtibial limb loss. Individuals with transfemoral limb loss had 27% and 31% larger sagittal and transverse variabilities from continuous relative phases compared to coupling angles, respectively. During both prosthetic and intact limb stance, individuals with transtibial limb loss had 19-35% greater tri-planar measures of continuous relative phase variability compared to coupling angle variabilities. During intact stance phase, tri-planar measures of continuous relative phase variability were 27%- 42% larger compared to coupling angle variabilities for individuals without limb loss. SIGNIFICANCE: While both methods provide valid estimates of lumbopelvic movement variability during gait, continuous relative phase variability may provide a more sensitive estimate in the lower limb loss population capturing velocity-specific motions of the trunk and pelvis.

Overall Greater Demands on the Musculoskeletal System at Multiple Walking Speeds in Service Members With Lower Limb Loss.

Individuals with lower limb loss often walk with altered/asymmetric movement mechanics, postulated as a catalyst for development of low back and knee pain. Here, the authors simultaneously investigated trunk-pelvic movement patterns and lower limb joint kinematics and kinetics among 38 males with traumatic, unilateral lower limb loss (23 transtibial and 15 transfemoral), and 15 males without limb loss, at a self-selected and 2 standardized (1.0 and 1.6 m/s) speeds. Individuals with versus without lower limb loss walked with greater trunk range of motion in the frontal and transverse planes at all speeds (despite ∼10% slower self-selected speeds). At all speeds, individuals with versus without limb loss exhibited +29% larger medial ground reaction forces, and at 1.6 m/s also exhibited +50% to 110% larger vertical hip power generation, +27% to 80% larger vertical hip power absorption, and +21% to 90% larger medial-lateral hip power absorption. Moreover, pervasive biomechanical differences between transtibial versus transfemoral limb loss identify amputation-level movement strategies. Overall, greater demands on the musculoskeletal system across walking speeds, particularly at the hip, knee, and low back, highlight potential risk factors for the development/recurrence of prevalent secondary musculoskeletal conditions (eg, joint degeneration and pain) following limb loss.

Volleyball-related injuries in adolescent female players: an initial report.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence and risk factors associated with musculoskeletal injuries sustained in female adolescent volleyball players. METHODS: Volleyball players (n = 276; 13-18 years), with any level of volleyball experience, were recruited. Participants completed a study-specific survey about their overall sport(s) involvement, training modalities, volleyball experience (beginner, intermediate, advanced), annual volume of volleyball play, injuries accrued during volleyball, and care received for injury. RESULTS: Annual volume of volleyball play was higher in advanced than beginner/intermediate players (490.0 hr/yr versus 302.3 hr/yr; p < 0.0001). Nearly 67% (188/276) of participants incurred one or more volleyball-related injuries over the last year. The ankle (40.6%), fingers (36.6%), knee (21.2%), and shoulder (15.5%) were the most frequently reported injury. Injury prevalence was higher in advanced than beginner/intermediate players (73.5% versus 62.0%; p = 0.04). Beginner/intermediate players have significantly higher odds ratio (OR) of sustaining an elbow injury than advanced players (OR 5.88; p = 0.025). 21.5% of injured players missed more than one month of play. CONCLUSION: More competitive and experienced adolescent female players may incur injuries due to progressively higher volumes of play as experience and competition level increase. Players who have committed to only playing volleyball participated in greater volumes of volleyball play, which increases the odds of sustaining an injury. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Understanding injury risk factors may improve clinical management and injury prevention.

Single-leg forward hopping exposures adversely affect knee joint health among persons with unilateral lower limb loss: A predictive model.

Single-leg hopping is an atypical, yet convenient, method of ambulation for individuals who have sustained unilateral lower limb-loss. Hopping is generally discouraged by therapists but many patients report hopping, and the potential deleterious effects of frequent hopping on knee joint health remains unclear. Mechanical fatigue due to repeated exposures to increased or abnormal loading on the intact limb is thought to be a primary contributor to the high prevalence of knee osteoarthritis among individuals with unilateral lower limb amputation. We aimed to compare knee joint mechanics between single-leg hopping and walking at self-selected paces among individuals with unilateral lower limb-loss, and estimated the associated probability of knee cartilage failure. Thirty-two males with traumatic unilateral lower limb-loss (22 transtibial, 10 transfemoral) hopped and walked at a self-selected pace along a 15-m walkway. Peak knee moments were input to a phenomenological model of cartilage fatigue to estimate the damage and long-term failure probability of the medial knee cartilage when hopping vs. walking. We estimate that each hop accumulates as much damage as at least 8 strides of walking (p < 0.001), and each meter of hopping accumulates as much damage as at least 12 m of walking (p < 0.001). The 30-year failure probability of the medial knee cartilage exceeded a "coin-flip" chance (50%) when performing more than 197 hops per day. Although a convenient mode of ambulation for persons with unilateral lower limb-loss, to mitigate risk for knee osteoarthritis it is advisable to minimize exposure to single-leg forward hopping.

Potential lower extremity amputation-induced mechanisms of chronic low back pain: role for focused resistance exercise.

Purpose: Approximately 185 000 individuals undergo limb amputations every year. Of this population, 40% experience lower extremity amputations. A common musculoskeletal condition that develops after amputation is chronic low back pain (LBP). LBP may be a consequence of one or combined mechanical factors including muscle atrophy, strength loss, level of amputation, kinematic traits of movement, mechanical loading and forces, prosthetic design/use and leg length discrepancy. Secondary consequences of LBP may collectively include the dependence of pain medications, impaired physical function, and diminished quality of life (QOL).Methods: A systematic literature search using PubMed was conducted to identify articles of low back pain in lower limb amputees.Results: Long-term interventions are needed to reduce the incidence, prevalence, and secondary impacts of LBP in amputees. Resistance exercise has strong potential to help correct mechanical deficits in lower limb amputees. Resistance exercise adaptations that can be beneficial for this population include improved neuromuscular control, increases in lumbar and core muscle strength cross-sectional area, and improved gait motion parameters.Conclusions: This narrative review provides an overview of the key mechanical and physiological factors which may contribute to chronic LBP in amputees, and discusses the use of resistance exercise training to combat these mechanical factors to improve pain symptoms.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONLow back pain is more prevalent in the amputee population compared to the general population.Low back pain may be due several mechanical factors that develop after a unilateral amputation.Lower extremity amputees with chronic low back pain experience compounded physical activity avoidance and functional limitations.Chronic low back pain in amputees erodes quality of life more than people with back pain or amputation alone.Therapeutic interventions, such as core strengthening and stabilization exercises, have strong potential to provide low back pain relief for amputees.

Cadence impact on cardiopulmonary, metabolic and biomechanical loading during downhill running.

BACKGROUND: Distance runners can approach long descents with slow cadence and long steps, or a fast cadence with shorter steps. These approaches differentially affect mechanical loading and energy demand. RESEARCH QUESTION: This study determined the cadence range in which biomechanical loads, caloric unit cost and energy cost were simultaneously minimized during downhill running (DR). METHODS: Trained runners (N = 40; 25.6 ± 7.2 yr; 42.5% female) participated in this experimental study. Participants ran on an instrumented treadmill while wearing a portable gas analyzer during six conditions: control normal level running (LR) at 0 deg inclination (CON-0); control DR -6 deg inclinaton (CON-6); DR at cadences +/-5% and +/-10% different from CON-6. A motion analysis system was used to capture running motion, and an instrumented treadmill captured force data. Cardiopulmonary measures, rating of perceived exertion (RPE), and biomechanical measures (temporal spatial parameters, peak ground reaction forces [GRF], vertical average loading rate [VALR], impulses) were calculated. Caloric unit cost and energy costs were standardized per unit distance. RESULTS: Running at -10% cadence increased HR by 10 bpm compared to CON-6 (p < 0.0001). Vertical excursion of the center of mass and step length were greatest in the cadence -10% and least in the cadence +10% conditions (both p < 0.0001). RPEs were higher among all cadence conditions compared to CON-0 (p < 0.0001). Caloric unit costs were lowest in CON-6, and +/5% cadence conditions compared to the CON-0 and +/-10% conditions (-2.1% to -12.3%, respectively; p < 0.05). Peak GRF and VALR were not different among conditions; vertical impulses were greatest in the -10% condition compared to CON-0, CON-6 and +5% and +10% by 11.3-14.5% (p < .001). SIGNIFICANCE: Changing cadence across level and downhill stretches is likely not necessary and may actually increase perceived effort of running. Running downhill at cadences that range +/-5% of preferred simultaneously minimize caloric unit cost and impulse loading.

Running Mechanics and Metabolic Responses With Water Bottles and Bottle Belt Holders.

PURPOSE: To determine whether differential kinematics, kinetics, rates of energy use, and cardiopulmonary responses occur during running with water bottles and bottle belt holders compared with running only. METHODS: Trained runners (N = 42; age 27.2 [6.4] y) ran on an instrumented treadmill for 4 conditions in a randomized order: control run (CON), handheld full water bottle (FULL; 16.9 fluid oz; 454 g), handheld half-full water bottle (HALF; 8.4 fluid oz; 227 g), and waist-worn bottle belt holder (BELT; hydration belt; 676 g). Gas exchange was measured using a portable gas analyzer. Kinetic and kinematic responses were determined by standard 3-dimensional videographic techniques. Interactions of limb side (right and left) by study condition (CON, FULL, HALF, and BELT) were tested for rates of oxygen use and energy expenditure and kinematic and kinetic parameters. RESULTS: No significant limb-side × condition interactions existed for rates of oxygen use or energy expenditure. A significant interaction occurred with sagittal elbow flexion (P < .001). Transverse pelvic-rotation excursions differed on average 3.8° across conditions. The minimum sagittal hip-flexion moment was higher in the right leg in the HALF and BELT conditions compared with CON (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Carrying water by hand or on the waist does not significantly change the kinematics of running motion, rates of oxygen use and energy expenditure, or cardiopulmonary measures over short durations. Runners likely make adjustments to joint moments and powers that preserve balance and protect the lower-extremity joints while maintaining rates of oxygen use and energy expenditure.

Exercise intervention for unilateral amputees with low back pain: study protocol for a randomised, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Atraumatic lower limb amputation is a life-changing event for approximately 185,000 persons in the United States each year. A unilateral amputation is associated with rapid changes to the musculoskeletal system including leg and back muscle atrophy, strength loss, gait asymmetries, differential mechanical joint loading and leg length discrepancies. Even with high-quality medical care and prostheses, amputees still develop secondary musculoskeletal conditions such as chronic low back pain (LBP). Resistance training interventions that focus on core stabilization, lumbar strength and dynamic stability during loading have strong potential to reduce LBP and address amputation-related changes to the musculoskeletal system. Home-based resistance exercise programs may be attractive to patients to minimize travel and financial burdens. METHODS/DESIGN: This study will be a single-assessor-blinded, pre-post-test randomised controlled trial involving 40 men and women aged 18-60 years with traumatic, unilateral transtibial amputation. Participants will be randomised to a home-based, resistance exercise group (HBRX) or a wait-list control group (CON). The HBRX will consist of 12 weeks of elastic resistance band and bodyweight training to improve core and lumbopelvic strength. Participants will be monitored via Skype or Facetime on a weekly basis. The primary outcome will be pain severity (11-point Numerical Pain Rating Scale; NRSpain). Secondary outcomes will include pain impact on quality of life (Medical Outcomes Short Form 36, Oswestry Disability Index and Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire), kinematics and kinetics of walking gait on an instrumented treadmill, muscle morphology (muscle thickness of multifidus, transversus abdominis, internal oblique), maximal muscle strength of key lumbar and core muscles, and daily step count. DISCUSSION: The study findings will determine whether a HBRX program can decrease pain severity and positively impact several physiological and mechanical factors that contribute to back pain in unilateral transtibial amputees with chronic LBP. We will determine the relative contribution of the exercise-induced changes in these factors on pain responsiveness in this population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT03300375 . Registered on 2 October 2017.

Mechanisms and Treatments for Shoulder Injuries in Overhead Throwing Athletes.

Shoulder injuries in overhead throwing athletes are very common. Throwing volume and mechanical forces that are placed on the glenohumeral joint and associated soft tissue structures are contributors. Poor biomechanics and weak links in the kinetic chain place this athletic population at increased risk for shoulder injuries. Common biomechanical deficiencies in overhead throwing athletes typically involve poor sequential timing of muscle activity and insufficient coordination also presented in shoulder elevation and other functional tasks. Kinetic chain deficits will lead to injury due to poor transference of energy from the lower extremities to the dominant upper extremity. Correction of these deficits involves effective treatment and prevention strategies. These include core and hip strengthening, balance training, optimize timing of biomechanical phases and events for each throwing movement, and following recommended rest guidelines. This article will synopsize current evidence of sport-specific injury mechanisms, injury treatment, and prevention of the shoulder in overhead throwing athletes.

Assessment and rehabilitation of chronic low back pain in baseball: part II.

Repetitive throwing and hitting motions in baseball place mechanical stresses to the lumbar spine which may cause low back pain (LBP). Pain may be due to vertebral stress reactions or insufficiency fractures, intervertebral disc degeneration or intervertebral disc herniation. Untreated chronic conditions have high potential to lead to a more significant injury such as spondylolysis. Chronic LBP increases the risk for missed playing time, early career termination and lower quality of life after retirement. Proper clinical assessment and prevention/rehabilitation of LBP in this population is thus important for performance, play time and overall long-term quality of life. This narrative review synopsizes the available evidence for assessment and rehabilitation of baseball players with LBP, including the structured rehabilitative techniques and programmes which should be administered to affected players. The state of the evidence suggests that there are deficits in identifying the optimal prevention and rehabilitation prescription components for the variety of LBP-inducing injuries in this athletic population.

Prevalence and proposed mechanisms of chronic low back pain in baseball: part i.

The prevalence of low back pain (LBP) among active baseball players ranges between 3 and 15%. The execution of baseball-specific manoeuvres, such as pitching or batting, may be related to the onset of LBP. These baseball motions are complex and require appropriate activation of the core musculature to produce a well-timed motion with forces minimized at the extremities. The spine, core and back musculature are involved with acceleration and deceleration of rotational motions. This narrative review synopsizes the available evidence of the prevalence of and mechanical factors underlying LBP in the baseball population. Possible mechanical mechanisms linking baseball play to LBP include aberrant motion, improper timing, high lumbar stress due to mechanical loading and lumbopelvic strength deficits. Potential clinical implications relating to these possible mechanical mechanisms will also be highlighted. The state of the evidence suggests that there are deficits in understanding the role of baseball motion and playing history in the development of spine conditions.

Exercise Benefits for Chronic Low Back Pain in Overweight and Obese Individuals.

Overweight and obese individuals with chronic low back pain (LBP) struggle with the combined physical challenges of physical activity and pain interference during daily life; perceived disability increases, pain symptoms worsen, and performance of functional tasks and quality of life (QOL) decline. Consistent participation in exercise programs positively affects several factors including musculoskeletal pain, perceptions of disability due to pain, functional ability, QOL, and body composition. It is not yet clear, however, what differential effects occur among different easily accessible exercise modalities in the overweight-obese population with chronic LBP. This narrative review synopsizes available randomized and controlled, or controlled and comparative, studies of easily accessible exercise programs on pain severity, QOL, and other outcomes, such as physical function or body composition change, in overweight-obese persons with chronic LBP. We identified 16 studies (N = 1,351) of various exercise programs (aerobic exercise [AX], resistance exercise [RX], aquatic exercise [AQU], and yoga-Pilates) that measured efficacy on LBP symptoms, and at least one other outcome such as perceived disability, QOL, physical function, and body composition. RX, AQU, and Pilates exercise programs demonstrated the greatest effects on pain reduction, perceived disability, QOL, and other health components. The highest adherence rate occurred with RX and AQU exercise programs, indicating that these types of programs may provide a greater overall impact on relevant outcomes for overweight-obese LBP patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V.

Kinematics of Shooting in High School and Collegiate Lacrosse Players With and Without Low Back Pain.

BACKGROUND: Low back pain (LBP) and motion alterations can occur in athletes who engage in high-speed throwing motions. The relationship between LBP and shooting motion in lacrosse players is not yet known. PURPOSE: To quantify the effects of LBP on key kinematic parameters of the lacrosse shot and determine the contribution of the severity of LBP on specific kinematic parameters of the shooting motion. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: High school and collegiate players (N = 24) were stratified into 2 groups based on back pain symptoms (LBP or no pain). Three-dimensional motion capture of overhead throws was used to collect data on knee, pelvis, trunk, and shoulder kinematics as well as crosse stick (the stick capped with a strung net) and ball speed. RESULTS: Mean low back numeric pain rating scale (NRSpain) score was 2.9. Knee flexion at ball release was greater in the LBP than no pain group, indicating a more bent knee (P = .04). The LBP group demonstrated less angular velocity transfer from pelvis to trunk than the no pain group (P = .05). Total range of motion of the pelvis and shoulders during the shot and follow-through were less in the LBP group than the no pain group (83.6° ± 24.5° vs 75.9° ± 24.5°, P = .05). Age- and sex-adjusted regression analyses revealed that the low back NRSpain rating contributed 6.3% to 25.0% of the variance to the models of shoulder transverse rotation range of motion, trunk and shoulder rotation angular velocities, and knee flexion angle (P < .05). CONCLUSION: LBP severity significantly contributes to trunk and shoulder motion restriction during lacrosse shooting. Inclusion of lumbopelvic and core training and prehabilitation programs for high school and collegiate players may reduce pain in affected players as well as help them to attain appropriate motion parameters and avoid secondary musculoskeletal injuries. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This research identified a prehabilitation need in the understudied lacrosse population. Therapeutic strategies can be developed to strengthen the throwing motion, which could control mechanical loading patterns on the low back and minimize pain symptoms in players with chronic LBP.