Development and assessment of conventional and targeted drug combinations for use in the treatment of aggressive breast cancers.

Combination chemotherapy has been at the forefront of cancer treatment for over 40 years. However, the rationale for selecting drug combinations and the process used to demonstrate clinical effectiveness has primarily followed trial and error methodology. Typically, the selection and assessment of combined drug therapies has been based on the effectiveness of each agent as monotherapy in treating the neoplasm and avoiding overlapping toxicities, followed by clinical trials to establish dose scheduling, toxicity, and efficacy. Unfortunately, this scheme is inefficient in terms of the time required to complete and revise these clinical trials based on the outcome to optimize the drug combination. A more rational approach for the development of combination oncology products should consider (i) in vitro assays for assessing therapeutic effects of drug combinations (antagonistic, additive or synergistic interactions) when added simultaneously; (ii) methods for measuring these interactions in vivo; (iii) the importance of understanding pharmacokinetic and biodistribution parameters when using drug combinations; (iv) the need to assess pathways known to contribute to cancer cell survival as well as metastasis; and (iv) the need to assess the fate of different cell populations (cancer and stroma) contributing to the development of cancer. Therefore, the goal of this article is to provide a road map for the preclinical development of drug combination products that will have improved therapeutic activity and a high likelihood of providing beneficial therapeutic outcomes in patients with aggressive cancers with a specific focus on patients with breast cancer.

A comparison of liposomal formulations of doxorubicin with drug administered in free form: changing toxicity profiles.

The anthracycline antibiotic doxorubicin has wide activity against a number of human neoplasms and is used extensively both as a single agent and in combination regimens. In addition to the use of free, unencapsulated doxorubicin, there are two US Food and Drug Administration approved liposomal formulations of doxorubicin currently available, with several additional liposomal formulations being researched either in the laboratory or in clinical trials. The two approved liposomal formulations of doxorubicin have significantly different lipid compositions and loading techniques, which lead to both unique pharmacokinetic and toxicity profiles, distinct from those of the unencapsulated form. This article discusses the toxicities associated with the free form of doxorubicin, as well as those associated with the two most common liposomal formulations, namely Doxil and Myocet. One of the key toxicity issues linked to the use of free doxorubicin is that of both an acute and a chronic form of cardiomyopathy. This is circumvented by the use of liposomal formulations, as these systems tend to sequester the drug away from organs such as the heart, with greater accumulation in liver, spleen and tumours. However, as will be discussed, the liposomal formulations of doxorubicin are not without their own related toxicities, and, in the case of Doxil, may be associated with the unique toxicity of palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia. Overall, the use of liposomal doxorubicin allows for a greater lifetime cumulative dose of doxorubicin to be administered, however acute maximal tolerated doses differ significantly, with that of Myocet being essentially equivalent to free doxorubicin, while higher doses of Doxil may be safely administered. This review highlights the differences in both toxicity and pharmacokinetic properties between free doxorubicin and the different liposomal formulations, as have been determined in pre-clinical and clinical testing against a number of different human neoplasms. The need for further testing of the liposomal formulations prior to the replacement of free doxorubicin with liposomal doxorubicin in any established combination therapy regimens, as well as in combination with the newer therapeutics such as monoclonal antibodies is also discussed.