ABSTRACT
Objective: To evaluate the effect of dry needling on the masseter muscle in the perception of tinnitus in patients with temporomandibular disorder. Methods: Twenty-five patients with tinnitus and muscular temporomandibular disorders were randomly assigned to groups study (n = 13) and control (n = 12). Three sessions of dry needling (study) and sham (control) were performed. Follow-up was performed 30, 60 and 90 days after the end of treatment. The Analog Visual Scale and Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) were used to evaluate the treatment. Results: In study group, 76.9% presented a reduction in the intensity and tinnitus discomfort and total THI. In control group, 66.7% presented a decrease in tinnitus intensity and total THI, and 58.3% reported a decrease in tinnitus discomfort. After 90 days, in the study group, 84.6% maintained improvement in pain intensity and reduction in THI score and 69.2% reported improvement in both intensity and discomfort caused by tinnitus. In control group, 75% achieved improvement in pain intensity, 33.2% maintained improvement in tinnitus intensity, and 41.7% maintained improvement in discomfort caused by tinnitus and total THI. In the total THI score, the study group presented improvement (p = 0.041). Conclusion: Dry needling combined with counseling was associated with improvement in pain intensity and tinnitus, decrease in tinnitus discomfort and reduction in total THI score.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To compare the intensity, location, and short-term impact of the periodontal discomfort/pain, as well as the related functional parameters of bite force and masticatory efficiency, between self-ligating and conventional orthodontic appliances. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 20 patients referred for orthodontic treatment, samples were collected from the gingival sulcus to evaluate the level of substance P using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Orthodontic devices were randomly bonded, with self-ligating appliances on one side and conventional brackets on the contralateral side. Pain threshold (PT), maximal bite force (MBF), and masticatory efficiency (ME) were assessed using standard validated techniques at the beginning of the treatment and 24 hours post-orthodontic activation with an 0.016-inch nickel-titanium wire. RESULTS: There were no significant differences (P > .05) in the substance P levels, PT, MBF, and ME between the self-ligating and conventional orthodontic appliances. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference between conventional and self-ligating appliances in the parameters of pain: substance P and pressure. Functional aspects, such as pain, discomfort, and masticatory efficiency, should not be considered when making a therapeutic decision regarding the use of self-ligating vs conventional orthodontic appliances.