ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Leprosy was common in Europe eight to twelve centuries ago but molecular confirmation of this has been lacking. We have extracted M. leprae ancient DNA (aDNA) from medieval bones and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) typed the DNA, this provides insight into the pattern of leprosy transmission in Europe and may assist in the understanding of M. leprae evolution. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Skeletons have been exhumed from 3 European countries (the United Kingdom, Denmark and Croatia) and are dated around the medieval period (476 to 1350 A.D.). we tested for the presence of 3 previously identified single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 10 aDNA extractions. M. leprae aDNA was extracted from 6 of the 10 bone samples. SNP analysis of these 6 extractions were compared to previously analysed European SNP data using the same PCR assays and were found to be the same. Testing for the presence of SNPs in M. leprae DNA extracted from ancient bone samples is a novel approach to analysing European M. leprae DNA and the findings concur with the previously published data that European M. leprae strains fall in to one group (SNP group 3). CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the suggestion that the M. leprae genome is extremely stable and show that archaeological M. leprae DNA can be analysed to gain detailed information about the genotypic make-up of European leprosy, which may assist in the understanding of leprosy transmission worldwide.
Subject(s)
DNA, Bacterial/genetics , Leprosy/microbiology , Mycobacterium leprae/genetics , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Archaeology/methods , Bacterial Typing Techniques/methods , Base Sequence , DNA Fingerprinting , Europe , Genotype , Humans , Molecular Sequence Data , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment LengthABSTRACT
Stool antigen-testing allows non-invasive detection of Helicobacter pylori that is indicative of active infection. Three commercial kits are currently marketed in the UK for stool antigen-testing. The aim of this study was to conduct a comparative evaluation of the performances of each of these tests, compared with culture and histological examination of gastric biopsies, for pre-treatment diagnosis of infection in an adult dyspeptic population in south-east England. Examination of 112 stool samples by the Premier Platinum HpSA ELISA (Meridian Diagnostics) and by the Amplified IDEIA HpStAR ELISA (DakoCytomation) kits demonstrated that the latter was more sensitive (81.3 versus 93.8%, respectively) and specific (91.7 versus 100.0%, respectively). Additionally, the IDEIA HpStAR was easier to interpret, with OD readings of positive and negative results being far from the recommended cut-off, whereas equivocal results that were generated by the HpSA kit were difficult to interpret. Additional testing of 87 of the 112 stools by the ImmunoCard STAT! HpSA kit (Meridian Diagnostics) demonstrated that this test was easier to perform than ELISA and was more sensitive than the HpSA kit but, compared with the IDEIA HpStAR kit, the ImmunoCard test was less sensitive (87.8 versus 95.9%, respectively) and specific (89.4 versus 100.0%, respectively). Furthermore, the ImmunoCard test generated weakly positive results, correlating with lower OD readings for both ELISA kits, that were difficult to interpret. The Amplified IDEIA HpStAR kit is therefore the most sensitive and specific of the three tests that are available for pre-treatment, non-invasive detection of H. pylori in stool samples in an English adult dyspeptic population.
