Matrix metalloproteinase-9 increases in the sputum from allergic occupational asthma patients after specific inhalation challenge.

BACKGROUND: Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs) play a role in the pathogenesis of asthma. MMP-9 increases in the sputum of asthmatic patients after bronchial challenge with common allergens. We sought to assess whether a high-molecular-weight occupational allergen was able to induce changes in MMP-9 as well as in other MMPs and TIMPs in subjects with occupational asthma. METHODS: Ten patients underwent specific inhalation challenge (SIC) on 2 consecutive days. We monitored changes in lung function by measuring FEV(1) for 7 h. Induced sputum test was performed at 6 h after sham and flour challenge. The total and differential cell counts were analyzed. Levels of MMPs (specifically MMP-2, MMP-7, MMP-9 and MMP-13) were measured using Fluorokine® MultiAnalyte Profiling kits and a Luminex® Bioanalyzer, while levels of TIMP-1 and TIMP-2 were measured by ELISA. RESULTS: Flour challenge increased the percentage of eosinophils in sputum samples. Asthmatic reactions induced by flour were associated with a significant increase in the sputum level of MMP-9 (p = 0.05), but not in the levels of MMP-2, MMP-7, MMP-13, TIMP-1 and TIMP-2. Sputum levels of MMP-9 measured after flour challenge were nearly significantly correlated (r = 0.67; p = 0.06) with the maximal fall in FEV(1) observed during the asthmatic reaction, but they did not correlate with the number of neutrophils (r = 0.18; p = 0.7) and eosinophils (r = 0.55; p = 0.2). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that MMP-9 increases in sputum samples from sensitized occupational asthma patients after SIC with flour.

Matrix metalloproteinases and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases in nasal lavage after an inhalation challenge with flour.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: The existence of nasal mucosa remodeling in allergic rhinitis is controversial. Few data are available on the dynamics of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs) in nasal fluid after an allergen challenge. We examined whether an immediate allergic reaction that induces nasal congestion and inflammation is able to also induce changes in remodeling parameters in nasal fluid. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled experimental study. METHODS: Ten patients with allergic occupational rhinitis due to flour underwent a control and active inhalation challenge with serial monitoring of nasal congestion and nasal symptoms with acoustic rhinometry and a visual analogue scale. Levels of remodeling markers (MMP-2, MMP-7, MMP-9, MMP-13, TIMP-1, TIMP-2) and inflammatory cells in nasal fluid were measured before the challenge and at 30 minutes, 6 hours, and 24 hours following the challenge. RESULTS: In contrast to the control challenge, the flour challenge induced nasal symptoms and significant decreases in nasal volume in all subjects. After the flour challenge, a significant increase in nasal levels of TIMP-2 and a nonsignificant increase in TIMP-1 levels were observed, whereas no significant changes in nasal levels of MMPs were documented. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that after an inhalation challenge with an occupational allergen, the nasal mucosa displayed an imbalance in favor of TIMPs enzymes activity as compared to MMPs enzymes activity, represented in an increase in nasal levels of TIMP-2 during the course of the early reaction following the allergen challenge.

Investigation of occupational asthma: sputum cell counts or exhaled nitric oxide?

BACKGROUND: The measure of sputum eosinophil counts is a useful tool in the investigation of occupational asthma (OA), but processing sputum is time consuming. Measuring the fractional concentration of exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) may be an alternative in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to assess the respective changes of sputum eosinophil counts and FENO following exposure to occupational agents in the routine practice of two tertiary centers in North America and Europe. METHODS: Workers undergoing specific inhalation challenges (SICs) for possible OA in tertiary clinics in both Canada and Belgium were enrolled. Sputum cell counts and FENO were collected at the end of the control day and at 7 and 24 h after exposure to the offending agent. RESULTS: Forty-one subjects had a negative SIC; 26 subjects had OA proven by a positive SIC. In subjects with positive SIC, there was a significant increase in sputum eosinophils at 7 h (9.0 [9.9]%) and 24 h (11.9 [14.9]%) after exposure compared with the baseline (2.8 [4.2]%), whereas there was a significant increase in FENO only 24 h after exposure (26.0 [30.5] ppb) compared with the baseline (16.6 [18.5] ppb). A 2.2% change in sputum eosinophil counts achieved a much higher sensitivity and positive predictive value than a 10-ppb change in FENO with similar specificity and negative predictive value for predicting a 20% decrease in FEV(1) during SICs. CONCLUSIONS: Sputum eosinophil counts constitute a more reliable tool than FENO to discriminate positive and negative SICs.

Rhinitis in subjects with work-exacerbated asthma.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed at characterizing the nature, severity, and timing of nasal and ocular symptoms in subjects with work-exacerbated asthma (WEA). METHODS: Among the 363 subjects referred to a tertiary-care hospital for the investigation of work-related asthma symptoms, 105 subjects who demonstrated non-specific bronchial hyperresponsiveness to histamine, but a negative response to a specific inhalation challenge with the suspected occupational agent(s) were considered as having WEA. Their characteristics were compared with those of 172 subjects with occupational asthma (OA), ascertained by a positive response to a specific inhalation challenge. RESULTS: A high proportion of subjects with WEA (83%) and OA (90%) reported at least one nasal symptom at work. Sneezing/itching and rhinorrhea were more frequent in subjects with OA (78% and 70%, respectively) than in those with WEA (61%, p = 0.004 and 57%, p = 0.038, respectively), while post-nasal discharge was more common in WEA (30%) than in OA (18%, p = 0.019). Nasal symptoms were less severe in WEA (median [25th-75th percentiles] global severity score: 4 [2-6]) as compared to OA (5 [4-7], p < 0.001). Nasal symptoms preceded less frequently those of asthma in subjects with WEA (17%) than in subjects with OA (43%, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Nasal symptoms are highly prevalent in subjects with WEA, although their clinical pattern differs from that found in OA. Further investigations of the health and socio-economic impacts of upper airways symptoms in WEA are required to improve the understanding and management of this common condition.