Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Prenat Diagn ; 44(6-7): 783-795, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38782600

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To describe and compare maternal and fetal comorbidities and obstetrical outcomes in pregnancies with hypoplastic left and right heart (HLHS and HRH) single ventricle cardiac defects (SVCD) from a single center under a multidisciplinary protocol. METHOD: A single center retrospective review of fetal SVCD from 2013 to 2022. Maternal-fetal comorbidities, delivery, and postnatal outcomes were compared between HLHS and HRH using descriptive statistics and univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Of 181 SVCD pregnancies (131 HLHS; 50 HRH), 9% underwent termination, 4% elected comfort care, 5 died in utero and 147/152 liveborns survived to the first cardiac intervention. Cesarean delivery occurred in 57 cases (37%), planned in 36 and unplanned in 21. Comorbidities, which did not differ between HLHS and HRH, included fetal growth restriction (FGR, 17%), prematurity (14%), maternal hypertension (9%), maternal obesity (50%), fetal extracardiac anomalies and chromosome anomalies (12%, 13%). In multivariate analysis, only earlier gestational age at delivery and oligohydramnios predicted decreased odds of survival at one year. CONCLUSION: Maternal-fetal comorbidities are common in both HLHS and HRH. Earlier gestational age at delivery and oligohydramnios predict lower postnatal survival. FGR, even with severe early onset, did not significantly impact short- or long-term neonatal survival in single ventricle conditions.


Subject(s)
Comorbidity , Pregnancy Outcome , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies , Adult , Pregnancy Outcome/epidemiology , Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome/epidemiology , Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome/surgery , Infant, Newborn , Heart Defects, Congenital/epidemiology , Heart Defects, Congenital/therapy , Pregnancy Complications/epidemiology , Univentricular Heart/surgery , Univentricular Heart/epidemiology
2.
WMJ ; 121(3): 212-219, 2022 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36301648

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Abortion is a polarizing social and medical issue, even among physicians. Though the public may expect physicians to hold purely scientific attitudes about abortion, their attitudes and behaviors are just as strongly informed by social and political factors as the public's. In a recent survey study of physicians at an academic medical center about their abortion attitudes, most reported strong support for abortion access. However, more were unwilling to consult in abortion-related cases, and many perceived little or no professional connection to abortion and were reticent to publicly advocate for their position. METHODS: In order to investigate the nuances in physicians' abortion attitudes, we analyzed the open-ended, qualitative responses provided by physicians at the end of a quantitative survey using modified concept mapping procedures and theme generation. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-two open-ended responses resulted in 487 data units. We categorized respondents' comments into 2 main groups: attempts to depersonalize, or distance oneself, from abortion and expressions of nuance or ambivalence about abortion. Ambivalence and nuance in abortion attitudes centered around multiple factors that varied from individual to structural. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support previous literature suggesting that physicians' abortion attitudes are not binary and add that nuanced attitudes may be perceived as unwelcome. Acknowledging ambivalence and addressing physicians' tendency to depersonalize abortion could result in more honest, open, and nuanced discourse and contribute to addressing structural issues that result in poor health outcomes, achieving broader reproductive justice goals, and greater access to abortion services.


Subject(s)
Abortion, Induced , Physicians , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Abortion, Legal , Surveys and Questionnaires , Attitude of Health Personnel
3.
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am ; 49(3): 501-519, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36122982

ABSTRACT

Severe hypertension in pregnancy is a medical emergency, defined as systolic blood pressure (BP) ≥ 160 mm Hg and/or diastolic BP ≥ 110 mm Hg taken 15 minutes to 4 or more hours apart. Outside pregnancy, acute severe hypertension (HTN) is defined as a BP greater than 180/110 to 120 reproducible on 2 occasions. The lower threshold for severe HTN in pregnancy reflects the increased risk for adverse outcomes, particularly maternal stroke and death, and may be a source of under-recognition and treatment delay, particularly in nonobstetrical health care settings. Once a severe hypertension episode is recognized, antihypertensive therapy should be initiated as soon as feasibly possible, at least within 30 to 60 minutes. Intravenous (IV) labetalol, hydralazine, and oral immediate-release nifedipine are all recommended first-line agents and should be administered according to available institutional protocols and based on provider knowledge and familiarity.


Subject(s)
Hypertension , Labetalol , Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Hydralazine/therapeutic use , Hypertension/diagnosis , Hypertension/drug therapy , Labetalol/therapeutic use , Nifedipine/therapeutic use , Pregnancy
4.
SSM Popul Health ; 17: 101002, 2022 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34984221

ABSTRACT

Abortion care is a crucial part of reproductive healthcare. Nevertheless, its availability is constrained by numerous forces, including care referrals within the larger healthcare system. Using a unique study of physician faculty across multiple specialties, we examine the factors associated with doctors' ability to refer patients for abortion care among those who were willing to consult in the care of a patient seeking an abortion (N = 674). Even though they were willing to refer a patient for an abortion, half (53%) of the physicians did not know how and whom to make those referrals, though they care for patients who may need them. Those with the least referral knowledge had not been taught abortion care during their medical training and were in earlier stages of their career than those who had more knowledge. This research exposes another obstacle for those seeking an abortion, a barrier that would be overcome with a clear and robust referral system within and across medical specialties.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...