Immunization programs in non-traditional settings.

BACKGROUND: The Downtown Eastside (DTES) of Vancouver is an inner-city neighbourhood of 10 square blocks where poverty, crowded housing, homelessness, poor nutrition and hygiene, chronic illness, and substance abuse put residents at risk for communicable diseases. The objective of the program was to minimize the burden of illness from vaccine-preventable diseases in this vulnerable population. This article describes the process and lessons learned to enable others to implement similar programs. INTERVENTION: Influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations were offered in community settings to all persons living in, working in, or visiting the DTES by teams of public health nurses and volunteers in the fall of 1999. Hepatitis A and B vaccinations were offered in January/February 2000. All 4 vaccines were offered in Fall 2000, influenza vaccine alone was offered in Fall 2001 and 2002; and pneumococcal, hepatitis A and B vaccines were offered in June 2002. RESULTS: During the initial 5-week influenza/pneumococcal immunization blitz, 8,723 persons were immunized; 79% received both vaccines. There was a reduction in visits for pneumonia to local emergency departments in the 3 months following this blitz. During the 5-week 2000 hepatitis A and B vaccination blitz, 3,542 persons were immunized; 58% received both vaccines. A reduction in reported cases of hepatitis A followed. Uptake of influenza vaccine was considerably reduced when offered in combination with 3 other vaccines. To maximize uptake, influenza vaccine was offered alone in subsequent years. CONCLUSIONS: Immunizations can be successfully delivered to high-risk inner-city populations in non-traditional settings, using public health nursing outreach in a blitz format.

Measuring hepatitis B uptake in a new universal infant program.

BACKGROUND: Vancouver-Richmond Health Board has the highest reported rate of hepatitis B in Canada, including an annual average of 25 cases in children under 12 years of age, based on reports from 1994-1997 inclusive. The current provincial adolescent grade-six hepatitis B immunization program does not protect against childhood infection. The regional health board implemented universal infant hepatitis B immunization in September 1998. METHOD: Immunization coverage data were obtained on a random sample of 191 infants born in March 1999 one year after initiation of the program. RESULTS: By eight months of age, 97.9% of children had received some vaccinations. 73.8% of infants had received three doses of hepatitis B vaccine and 12.6% had received two doses. In comparison, 89% had received three doses and 7.9% two doses of DPTP-Hib vaccine. 13.1% of infants had not received any hepatitis B vaccine. For a majority (67%) of these children, their physician's lack of awareness or lack of acceptance of the program constituted the reason for no hepatitis B vaccine uptake. Only one parent cited adverse publicity as the reason for refusing vaccination. INTERPRETATION: This survey reveals a successful first year of the program without harm to the pre-existing childhood vaccination programs. Hepatitis B vaccine uptake can be improved by increased awareness among physicians and parents.