Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 12 de 12
Filter
1.
Public Health Rep ; 136(5): 554-561, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34139910

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Federal open-data initiatives that promote increased sharing of federally collected data are important for transparency, data quality, trust, and relationships with the public and state, tribal, local, and territorial partners. These initiatives advance understanding of health conditions and diseases by providing data to researchers, scientists, and policymakers for analysis, collaboration, and use outside the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), particularly for emerging conditions such as COVID-19, for which data needs are constantly evolving. Since the beginning of the pandemic, CDC has collected person-level, de-identified data from jurisdictions and currently has more than 8 million records. We describe how CDC designed and produces 2 de-identified public datasets from these collected data. METHODS: We included data elements based on usefulness, public request, and privacy implications; we suppressed some field values to reduce the risk of re-identification and exposure of confidential information. We created datasets and verified them for privacy and confidentiality by using data management platform analytic tools and R scripts. RESULTS: Unrestricted data are available to the public through Data.CDC.gov, and restricted data, with additional fields, are available with a data-use agreement through a private repository on GitHub.com. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Enriched understanding of the available public data, the methods used to create these data, and the algorithms used to protect the privacy of de-identified people allow for improved data use. Automating data-generation procedures improves the volume and timeliness of sharing data.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S./organization & administration , Confidentiality/standards , Data Anonymization/standards , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S./standards , Humans , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , United States/epidemiology
3.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 37(10): 1201-11, 2016 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27418168

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES To develop common indicators, relevant to both EU member states and the United States, that characterize and allow for meaningful comparison of antimicrobial stewardship programs among different countries and healthcare systems. DESIGN Modified Delphi process. PARTICIPANTS A multinational panel of 20 experts in antimicrobial stewardship. METHODS Potential indicators were rated on the perceived feasibility to implement and measure each indicator and clinical importance for optimizing appropriate antimicrobial prescribing. RESULTS The outcome was a set of 33 indicators developed to characterize the infrastructure and activities of hospital antimicrobial stewardship programs. Among them 17 indicators were considered essential to characterize an antimicrobial stewardship program and therefore were included in a core set of indicators. The remaining 16 indicators were considered optional indicators and included in a supplemental set. CONCLUSIONS The integration of these indicators in public health surveillance and special studies will lead to a better understanding of best practices in antimicrobial stewardship. Additionally, future studies can explore the association of hospital antimicrobial stewardship programs to antimicrobial use and resistance. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2016:1-11.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents/therapeutic use , Antimicrobial Stewardship , Consensus , Drug Utilization , Interprofessional Relations , Anti-Bacterial Agents , Antimicrobial Stewardship/methods , Antimicrobial Stewardship/standards , Delphi Technique , European Union , Hospitals , Humans , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States
4.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 65(18): 481-2, 2016 May 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27171735

ABSTRACT

On September 17, 2015, the Pennsylvania Department of Health (PADOH) notified CDC of a cluster of three potentially health care-associated mucormycete infections that occurred among solid organ transplant recipients during a 12-month period at hospital A. On September 18, hospital B reported that it had identified an additional transplant recipient with mucormycosis. Hospitals A and B are part of the same health care system and are connected by a pedestrian bridge. PADOH requested CDC's assistance with an on-site investigation, which started on September 22, to identify possible sources of infection and prevent additional infections.


Subject(s)
Cross Infection/epidemiology , Disease Outbreaks , Mucormycosis/epidemiology , Organ Transplantation/adverse effects , Transplant Recipients , Adult , Cluster Analysis , Critical Care , Cross Infection/diagnosis , Hospitals , Humans , Mucormycosis/diagnosis , Pennsylvania/epidemiology
5.
Vaccine ; 31(38): 4060-2, 2013 Aug 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23845820

ABSTRACT

In a severe pandemic, rapid production and deployment of vaccines will potentially be critical in mitigating the impact on populations and essential services. We compared access to vaccines and timing of delivery relative to identification of A(H1N1)pdm09 and the geographic progression of the pandemic in the WHO European Region in order to identify gaps in provision. Information on vaccine procurement and donations was collected through a web-based survey conducted in all 53 member states of the Region. Among the 51 countries responding to the survey, the majority (84%) implemented vaccination campaigns against A(H1N1)pdm09. However, time of vaccine receipt and number of doses varied substantially across the region, with delayed access in many countries especially in those in the lowest income range. Improving access to influenza vaccines in low resource countries and solving issues of product liability should help reduce inequalities and operational challenges arising during a future public health crisis.


Subject(s)
Healthcare Disparities/statistics & numerical data , Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype/pathogenicity , Influenza Vaccines , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Data Collection , Europe/epidemiology , Humans , Immunization Programs/organization & administration , Influenza, Human/virology
6.
N Engl J Med ; 369(17): 1598-609, 2013 Oct 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23252499

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Fungal infections are rare complications of injections for treatment of chronic pain. In September 2012, we initiated an investigation into fungal infections associated with injections of preservative-free methylprednisolone acetate that was purchased from a single compounding pharmacy. METHODS: Three lots of methylprednisolone acetate were recalled by the pharmacy; examination of unopened vials later revealed fungus. Notification of all persons potentially exposed to implicated methylprednisolone acetate was conducted by federal, state, and local public health officials and by staff at clinical facilities that administered the drug. We collected clinical data on standardized case-report forms, and we tested for the presence of fungi in isolates and specimens by examining cultures and performing polymerase-chain-reaction assays and histopathological and immunohistochemical testing. RESULTS: By October 19, 2012, more than 99% of 13,534 potentially exposed persons had been contacted. As of July 1, 2013, there were 749 reported cases of infection in 20 states, with 61 deaths (8%). Laboratory evidence of Exserohilum rostratum was present in specimens from 153 case patients (20%). Additional data were available for 728 case patients (97%); 229 of these patients (31%) had meningitis with no other documented infection. Case patients had received a median of 1 injection (range, 1 to 6) of implicated methylprednisolone acetate. The median age of the patients was 64 years (range, 15 to 97), and the median incubation period (the number of days from the last injection to the date of the first diagnosis) was 47 days (range, 0 to 249); 40 patients (5%) had a stroke. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of data from a large, multistate outbreak of fungal infections showed substantial morbidity and mortality. The infections were associated with injection of a contaminated glucocorticoid medication from a single compounding pharmacy. Rapid public health actions included prompt recall of the implicated product, notification of exposed persons, and early outreach to clinicians.


Subject(s)
Disease Outbreaks , Drug Contamination , Glucocorticoids , Meningitis, Fungal/epidemiology , Methylprednisolone , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antifungal Agents/therapeutic use , Ascomycota/isolation & purification , Aspergillus fumigatus/isolation & purification , Drug Compounding , Female , Glucocorticoids/administration & dosage , Humans , Infectious Disease Incubation Period , Injections, Spinal/adverse effects , Male , Meningitis, Fungal/drug therapy , Methylprednisolone/administration & dosage , Middle Aged , Public Health , Stroke/epidemiology , Stroke/microbiology , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
10.
Clin Infect Dis ; 41 Suppl 4: S269-72, 2005 Aug 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16032563

ABSTRACT

Historically, infection with strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), which are usually multidrug-resistant, has been acquired by persons in hospitals, nursing homes, and other health care institutions. These infections are known as health care-associated MRSA infections. Community-associated MRSA (CA-MRSA) infection, which bears significant similarities to and differences from health care-associated MRSA infection, appears to be on the rise and has been described in several well-defined populations, such as children, incarcerated persons, Alaskan Natives, Native Americans, Pacific Islanders, sports participants, and military personnel. CA-MRSA infection has caused severe morbidity and death in otherwise healthy persons. Proven, reproducible strategies and programs for preventing the emergence and spread of CA-MRSA are lacking. Further surveillance and epidemiological and clinical studies on CA-MRSA infections are necessary for documenting the extent of the problem and for developing and evaluating effective prevention and control efforts.


Subject(s)
Community-Acquired Infections/drug therapy , Methicillin Resistance , Staphylococcal Infections/drug therapy , Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Community-Acquired Infections/epidemiology , Community-Acquired Infections/prevention & control , Community-Acquired Infections/transmission , Humans , Indians, North American , Military Personnel , Pacific Islands/ethnology , Prisoners , Risk Factors , Sports , Staphylococcal Infections/epidemiology , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Staphylococcal Infections/prevention & control , United States/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...