Should we abandon hormonal therapy in endometrial cancer? Outcomes of recurrent and metastatic endometrial cancer treated with systemic progestins.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study is to determine primary survival endpoints in women with recurrent and metastatic endometrial carcinoma (RMEC) treated with progestins. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted at The Ottawa Hospital using electronic medical records. Inclusion criteria were a diagnosis of RMEC between 2000 and 2019, endometrioid histology, and ≥one line of progestin treatment. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Of 2342 cases reviewed, 74 met inclusion criteria. Sixty-six (88.0%) patients received megestrol acetate and 9 (12.0%) received a progestin alternative. The distribution of tumors by grade was: 1: 25 (33.3%), 2: 30 (40.0%), and 3: 20 (26.7%). The PFS and OS for the entire study sample was 14.3 months (95% CI 6.2-17.9) and 23.3 months (14.8-36.8), respectively. The PFS for patients with Grade 1-2 RMEC was 15.7 months (8.0, 19.5), compared to 5.0 months (3.0, 23.0) with Grade 3 disease. The OS for patients with Grade 1-2 versus Grade 3, was 25.9 months (15.3, 40.3) versus 12.5 months (5.7, 35.9), respectively. Thirty-four (45.9%) and 40 (54.1%) patients were treated with 0 and ≥1 line of chemotherapy. The PFS for chemotherapy-naïve patients was 17.9 months (14.3, 27.0), versus 6.2 months (3.9, 14.8) following ≥1 line of treatment. The OS was 29.1 months (17.9, 61.1) for chemotherapy-naïve patients versus 23.0 months (10.5, 37.6) for patients previously exposed. CONCLUSIONS: This real-world data on RMEC suggests there is a role for progestins in select subgroups of women. The PFS for chemotherapy-naïve patients was 17.9 months (14.3, 27.0), versus 6.2 months (3.9, 14.8) following ≥1 line of treatment. The OS was 29.1 months (17.9, 61.1) for chemotherapy-OS was 29.1 months (17.9, 61.1) for chemotherapy-naïve patients versus 23.0 months (10.5, 37.6) for patients previously exposed.

Olaparib maintenance monotherapy in platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer patients without a germline BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation: OPINION primary analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The phase IIIb OPINION trial (NCT03402841) investigated olaparib maintenance monotherapy in patients without a deleterious or suspected deleterious germline BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation (gBRCAm) who had platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer (PSROC) and had received ≥2 previous lines of platinum-based chemotherapy. METHODS: In this single-arm, open-label, international study, patients who had responded to platinum-based chemotherapy received maintenance olaparib tablets (300 mg twice daily) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) (modified RECIST version 1.1). A key secondary endpoint was PFS by homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) and somatic BRCAm (sBRCAm) status. The primary analysis of PFS was planned for 18 months after the last patient received their first dose. RESULTS: Two hundred and seventy-nine patients were enrolled and received olaparib. At data cutoff (October 2, 2020), 210 PFS events had occurred (75.3% maturity) and median PFS was 9.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.6-10.9) in the overall population. At 12 and 18 months, 38.5% and 24.3% of patients were progression-free, respectively. In the predefined biomarker subgroups, median PFS was 16.4, 11.1, 9.7, and 7.3 months in sBRCAm, HRD-positive including sBRCAm, HRD-positive excluding sBRCAm, and HRD-negative patients, respectively. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were nausea (48.4%) and fatigue/asthenia (44.1%). TEAEs led to dose interruption, dose reduction, and treatment discontinuation in 47.0%, 22.6%, and 7.5% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: Maintenance olaparib demonstrated clinical benefit in patients without a gBRCAm, and across all subgroups, compared with historical placebo controls. There were no new safety signals.

An enhanced prognostic score for overall survival of patients with cancer derived from a large real-world cohort.

BACKGROUND: By understanding prognostic biomarkers, we gain insights into disease biology and may improve design, conduct, and data analysis of clinical trials and real-world data. In this context, we used the Flatiron Health Electronic Health Record-derived deidentified database that provides treatment outcome and biomarker data from >280 oncology centers in the USA, organized into 17 cohorts defined by cancer type. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In 122 694 patients, we analyzed demographic, clinical, routine hematology, and blood chemistry parameters within a Cox proportional hazard framework to derive a multivariable prognostic risk model for overall survival (OS), the 'Real wOrld PROgnostic score (ROPRO)'. We validated ROPRO in two independent phase I and III clinical studies. RESULTS: A total of 27 variables contributed independently and homogeneously across cancer indications to OS. In the largest cohort (advanced non-small-cell lung cancer), for example, patients with elevated ROPRO scores (upper 10%) had a 7.91-fold (95% confidence interval 7.45-8.39) increased death hazard compared with patients with low scores (lower 10%). Median survival was 23.9 months (23.3-24.5) in the lowest ROPRO quartile Q1, 14.8 months (14.4-15.2) in Q2, 9.4 months (9.1-9.7) in Q3, and 4.7 months (4.6-4.8) in Q4. The ROPRO model performance indicators [C-index = 0.747 (standard error 0.001), 3-month area under the curve (AUC) = 0.822 (0.819-0.825)] strongly outperformed those of the Royal Marsden Hospital Score [C-index = 0.54 (standard error 0.0005), 3-month AUC = 0.579 (0.577-0.581)]. We confirmed the high prognostic relevance of ROPRO in clinical Phase 1 and III trials. CONCLUSIONS: The ROPRO provides improved prognostic power for OS. In oncology clinical development, it has great potential for applications in patient stratification, patient enrichment strategies, data interpretation, and early decision-making in clinical studies.

Incident depression and mortality among people with different types of dementia: results from a longitudinal cohort study.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the independent and combined association of incident depression and dementia with mortality and to explore whether the magnitude of the association varies according to different types of dementia, including Alzheimer's disease and vascular dementia. METHODS AND DESIGN: The study was based on a population-based longitudinal cohort consisting of 9940 participants at baseline and followed for over 14 years. The sample used for the analyses included 6114 participants with available information on diagnosis of incident dementia and depression. For survival analyses, Cox regression models with incident dementia (n = 293; 5%) and incident depression (n = 746; 12%) as time-dependent variables were used. RESULTS: Cox models adjusted for relevant confounders indicated that comorbidity of incident vascular dementia and incident depression was associated with a much higher mortality risk (HR 6.99; 95% CI 3.84-12.75) than vascular dementia in the absence of depression (HR 2.80; 95% CI 1.92-4.08). In contrast, estimates for comorbidity of Alzheimer's disease and depression were slightly lower than those for Alzheimer in absence of depression (HR 3.56; 95% CI 1.83-6.92 and HR 4.19; 95% CI 2.97-5.90, respectively). Incident depression in the absence of incident dementia was only weakly associated with mortality. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that depression and vascular dementia might have synergistic effects on mortality. The results have relevant public health implications for prevention, routine screening for and early treatment of depression among older people, especially those at risk of vascular dementia.

Lifestyle factors and risk of sporadic colorectal cancer by microsatellite instability status: a systematic review and meta-analyses.

Introduction: The association of lifestyle factors with molecular pathological subtypes of colorectal cancer (CRC), such as microsatellite instability (MSI), could provide further knowledge about the colorectal carcinogenic process. The aim of this review was to evaluate possible associations between lifestyle factors and risk of sporadic CRC by MSI status. Methods: PubMed and Web of Science were searched for studies investigating the association between alcohol, body mass index, dietary fiber, hormone replacement therapy (HRT), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, physical activity, red meat, smoking, or statin use, with MSI-high (MSI-H) and microsatellite stable (MSS) CRC. Meta-analyses were carried out to calculate summary relative risks (sRR). Results: Overall, 31 studies reporting on the association between lifestyle factors and CRC according to MSI status were included in this review. Ever smoking was associated with MSI-H (sRR = 1.62; 95% CI: 1.40-1.88) and MSS/MSI-low CRC (sRR = 1.10; 95% CI: 1.01-1.20), but the association was significantly stronger for MSI-H CRC. The use of HRT was associated with a 20% decrease (sRR = 0.80; 95% CI: 0.73-0.89) in the risk of MSS CRC, but was not associated with MSI-H CRC. An increase in body mass index per 5 kg/m2 was equally associated with MSS and MSI-H CRC (sRR = 1.22, in both cases), but was statistically significant for MSS CRC only (95% CI: 1.11-1.34 and 0.94-1.58, respectively). Limited evidence for associations between other lifestyle factors and CRC by MSI status exists. Conclusions: Lifestyle factors, such as HRT and smoking are differentially associated with the risk of MSI-H and MSS CRC. Further research on associations of lifestyle factors and CRC subtypes is necessary to provide a better understanding of the CRC disease pathway.

OV21/PETROC: a randomized Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup phase II study of intraperitoneal versus intravenous chemotherapy following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and optimal debulking surgery in epithelial ovarian cancer.

Background: The purpose of this multistage, adaptively, designed randomized phase II study was to evaluate the role of intraperitoneal (i.p.) chemotherapy following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and optimal debulking surgery in women with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Patients and methods: We carried out a multicenter, two-stage, phase II trial. Eligible patients with stage IIB-IVA EOC treated with platinum-based intravenous (i.v.) NACT followed by optimal (<1 cm) debulking surgery were randomized to one of the three treatment arms: (i) i.v. carboplatin/paclitaxel, (ii) i.p. cisplatin plus i.v./i.p. paclitaxel, or (iii) i.p. carboplatin plus i.v./i.p. paclitaxel. The primary end point was 9-month progressive disease rate (PD9). Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), toxicity, and quality of life (QOL). Results: Between 2009 and 2015, 275 patients were randomized; i.p. cisplatin containing arm did not progress beyond the first stage of the study after failing to meet the pre-set superiority rule. The final analysis compared i.v. carboplatin/paclitaxel (n = 101) with i.p. carboplatin, i.v./i.p. paclitaxel (n = 102). The intention to treat PD9 was lower in the i.p. carboplatin arm compared with the i.v. carboplatin arm: 24.5% (95% CI 16.2% to 32.9%) versus 38.6% (95% CI 29.1% to 48.1%) P = 0.065. The study was underpowered to detect differences in PFS: HR PFS 0.82 (95% CI 0.57-1.17); P = 0.27 and OS HR 0.80 (95% CI 0.47-1.35) P = 0.40. The i.p. carboplatin-based regimen was well tolerated with no reduction in QOL or increase in toxicity compared with i.v. administration alone. Conclusion: In women with stage IIIC or IVA EOC treated with NACT and optimal debulking surgery, i.p. carboplatin-based chemotherapy is well tolerated and associated with an improved PD9 compared with i.v. carboplatin-based chemotherapy. Clinical trial number: clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01622543.

The forgotten woman's cancer: vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC) and a targeted approach to therapy.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC) has been on the rise since the 1990s. There has been no new treatment for advanced and recurrent disease in decades, with most women succumbing to the disease. Despite two distinct etiologies of VSCC, human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated and HPV-independent disease, there is no difference in therapeutic options. METHODS: A literature review was carried out by searching EMBASE and Medline databases between January 1990 and March 2016 by pairing the keywords of vulvar carcinoma, vulva cancer, vulvar and vulva with molecular markers involved in the cell cycle, apoptosis and angiogenesis. Molecular targets of prognostic significance were identified and targeted agents of therapeutic relevance to both HPV-independent and HPV-associated VSCC were then reviewed. RESULTS: Recent advances in our understanding of the molecular biology of VSCC provide insight into the future management of VSCC with molecular targeted therapies. Aberrant cell cycle activity is common in both HPV-associated and HPV-independent VSCC and is characterized by overexpression of p53, Rb and cyclin D1, supporting targeting of these protein products and their downstream pathways. Extracellular regulators of cellular activity, such as EGFR, as well as inhibitors of angiogenesis are being clinically evaluated in VSCC. HPV-independent VSCC is characterized by actionable mutations, including PI3K, CDKN2A and PTEN. In HPV-associated disease, therapeutic vaccines targeting the E6 and E7 HPV oncogenes and immune-based therapies are under investigation. CONCLUSION: There has been a paucity of clinical trials in recent years in this neglected women's cancer. Directed therapy against cell cycle regulatory molecules and extracellular proteins and the inhibition of angiogenesis are of broad therapeutic relevance in VSCC. Therapeutic strategies that target actionable mutations should be explored. In HPV-associated VSCC, novel treatments that exploit the virology of HPV and/or enhance the host immune response merit further study.

First application of the Automated QUantitative Analysis (AQUA) technique to quantify PTEN protein expression in ovarian cancer: A correlative study of NCIC CTG OV.16.

BACKGROUND: Platinum resistance is a dominant cause of poor outcomes in advanced ovarian cancer (OC). A mechanism of platinum resistance is the inhibition of apoptosis through phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase (PI3K) pathway activation. The role of phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN), a negative regulator of this pathway, as a tumor biomarker is unclear. Quantitative analysis of PTEN expression as an alternative to immunohistochemistry has not been considered. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In 238 patient tumors from the NCIC-CTG trial OV.16, PTEN protein expression was quantified by Automated QUantitative Analysis (AQUA). Cox model was used to study the association between PTEN expression and clinical outcomes using a minimum p-value approach in univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis was used to adjust for clinical and pathological parameters. RESULTS: PTEN scores (range 13.9-192.3) of the 202 samples that passed quality control were analyzed. In univariate analysis, there was a trend suggesting an association between PTEN expression by AQUA as a binary variable (low ≤61 vs high >61) and progression free survival (HR=0.77, p=0.083), and in multivariate analysis, this association approached significance (HR=0.74, p=0.059). The relationship between quantitative PTEN expression and PFS differed (p=0.01 for interaction) by the extent of surgical debulking (residual disease (RD) <1cm or ≥1cm), with a numerically superior PFS in patients with high PTEN (23.5 vs 14.9m) only when RD<1cm (p=0.19). There was no association between PTEN levels and overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: AQUA is a novel method to measure PTEN expression. Further study of PTEN as a biomarker in OC is warranted.

Loop electrosurgical excision procedure for the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: how much excision is enough?

This is a retrospective observational study to compare outcomes in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) treated with loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) using combined ectocervical/endocervical resection vs ectocervical resection alone. We demonstrated that additional endocervical resection during loop electrosurgical excision procedure did not significantly lower the risk of subsequent recurrence compared with ectocervical resection alone, in the treatment of CIN. With current published data supporting subsequent increased adverse effects of LEEP on future obstetrical outcomes, endocervical excision should be applied selectively. We recommend that additional endocervical excision should be reserved only for patients with a strong suspicion of underlying endocervical canal involvement based on colposcopic assessment or in patients with unsatisfactory colposcopy, where it is essential to evaluate the endocervical canal.

BRCA1 protein levels and PIK3CA mutations as predictive biomarkers for response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer: An exploratory analysis.

BRCA1 overexpression and phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PIK3CA) pathway activation are involved in the resistance to DNA damaging agents. Thus, we hypothesized that BRCA1 protein expression and activating PIK3CA mutations are potential tumor biomarkers for the chemotherapeutic response to doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide plus docetaxel in locally advanced breast cancer. Informed consent was obtained and clinical, pathological and response data were collected. BRCA1 protein expression levels were assessed by immunohistochemistry of the archived tissue by two independent pathologists. The PIK3CA mutation status was assessed by nested PCR amplification and DNA sequencing. BRCA1 protein levels and the PIK3CA mutation status were correlated with pathological complete response and a partial response or better using the Chi-square test, Fisher's exact test and logistic regression. Of the 136 eligible participants, 59 samples could be analyzed. There was a trend of relatively low levels of BRCA1 protein achieving a pathological complete response (pCR), although this was not statistically significant [odds ratio (OR)=1.74; p=0.437]. Twenty-eight percent of patients had PIK3CA mutations, but no statistically significant association with pCR (OR=0.977; p=0.971) was noted. Neither BRCA1 protein levels (OR=1.18; p=0.818) nor PIK3CA mutations (OR=1.03; p=0.971) appeared to be associated with the likelihood of achieving a partial response or better from neoadjuvant chemotherapy. PIK3CA wild-type mutation status showed a trend towards an increased likelihood of not presenting with inflammatory disease (OR=5.34; p=0.101). In this exploratory study, neither BRCA1 protein expression levels nor the presence of PIK3CA mutations were significantly associated with chemotherapy response in locally advanced breast cancer. However, the relatively small sample size limits the overall interpretation.

Progression-free survival in advanced ovarian cancer: a Canadian review and expert panel perspective.

Ovarian cancer is leading cause of gynecologic cancer mortality in Canada. To date, overall survival (os) has been the most-used endpoint in oncology trials because of its relevance and objectivity. However, as a result of various factors, including the pattern of sequential salvage therapies, measurement of os and collection of os data are becoming particularly challenging. Phase ii and iii trials have therefore adopted progression-free survival (pfs) as a more convenient surrogate endpoint; however, the clinical significance of pfs remains unclear. This position paper presents discussion topics and findings from a pan-Canadian meeting of experts that set out to evaluate the relevance of pfs as a valid endpoint in ovarian cancer;reach a Canadian consensus on the relevance of pfs in ovarian cancer; andtry to address how pfs translates into clinical benefit in ovarian cancer.Overall, the findings and the group consensus posit that future studies should ensure that trials are designed to evaluate pfs, os, and other clinically relevant endpoints such as disease-related symptoms or quality of life;incorporate interim futility analyses intended to stop accrual early when the experimental regimen is not active;stop trials early to declare superiority only when compelling evidence suggests that a new treatment provides benefit for a pre-specified, clinically relevant endpoint such as os or symptom relief; anddiscourage early release of secondary endpoint results when such a release might increase the frequency of crossover to the experimental intervention.

Breast cancer 1 (BRCA1) protein expression as a prognostic marker in sporadic epithelial ovarian carcinoma: an NCIC CTG OV.16 correlative study.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer 1 (BRCA1) protein inactivation in sporadic ovarian carcinoma (OC) is common and low BRCA1 expression is linked with platinum sensitivity. The clinical validation of BRCA1 as a prognostic marker in OC remains unresolved. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In 251 patient samples from the NCIC CTG clinical trial, OV.16, BRCA1 protein expression was determined by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: For all patients, when BRCA1 score was analyzed as a continuous variable, there was no significant correlation between BRCA1 protein expression and progression-free survival (PFS) [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) = 1.15 (0.96-1.37), P = 0.12] or response rate [HR = 0.89 (0.70-1.12), P = 0.32]. In the 116 patients with minimal residual disease (RD), higher BRCA1 expression correlated significantly with worse PFS [HR = 1.40 (1.04-1.89), P = 0.03]. Subgroup analysis divided patients with minimal RD into low (BRCA1 ≤2.5) and high (BRCA1 >2.5) expression groups. Patients with low BRCA1 expression had a more favorable outcome [median PFS was 24.7 and 16.6 months in patients with low and high BRCA1, respectively; HR = 0.56 (0.35-0.89), P = 0.01]. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that BRCA1 protein is a prognostic marker in sporadic OC patients with minimal RD. Further research is needed to evaluate BRCA1 as a predictive biomarker and to target BRCA1 expression to enhance chemotherapeutic sensitivity.

Does intraperitoneal chemotherapy benefit optimally debulked epithelial ovarian cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy?

OBJECTIVE: To compare survival of ovarian cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by intraperitoneal (IP) versus intravenous (IV) chemotherapy after optimal interval debulking. METHODS: Optimally debulked patients after neoadjuvant IV platinum paclitaxel based chemotherapy followed by postoperative IP chemotherapy were reviewed. A similar cohort of patients treated postoperatively with IV platinum paclitaxel based chemotherapy was chosen as control. Patient and disease-related demographics were abstracted from electronic hospital medical records. Associations between categorical variables were determined using Chi square test. Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier method estimated progression-free and overall survival. RESULTS: Fifty-four IV and 17 IP treated patients after interval debulking were studied. The majority of patients had serous histology and grade 3 tumours. There was no significant difference between the two groups with respect to age and proportion of microscopic residual disease. Patients with macroscopic residual disease had a significantly worse prognosis (HR=2.17, 95% CI=1.23-3.85, p=0.008). Clinical complete response after primary treatment was 67% and 88% in the IV and IP group, respectively (p=0.36). Estimated mean progression-free survival was 18 months in the IV group and 14.1 months in the IP group (p=0.42). IP chemotherapy was not predictive of progression-free survival in the Cox model adjusted for age and residual disease status (HR=1.22, 95% CI=0.62-2.4, p=0.56). Estimated mean survival was 68.9 months in the IV group and 37.5 months in the IP group (p=0.85). CONCLUSIONS: Survival benefit associated with IP chemotherapy after optimal upfront surgery may not translate to the neoadjuvant setting.

Clinical Considerations of BRCA1- and BRCA2-Mutation Carriers: A Review.

Individuals who carry an inherited mutation in the breast cancer 1 (BRCA1) and BRCA2 genes have a significant risk of developing breast and ovarian cancer over the course of their lifetime. As a result, there are important considerations for the clinician in the counseling, followup and management of mutation carriers. This review outlines salient aspects in the approach to patients at high risk of developing breast and ovarian cancer, including criteria for genetic testing, screening guidelines, surgical prophylaxis, and chemoprevention.

The use of cytogenetics in understanding ovarian cancer.

The future of cancer research is no longer limited to epidemiological data and clinical management, but rather encompasses a new dimension of understanding, that involves genetics of the tumors themselves. This has been exemplified most prominently in hematological tumors where alterations at the DNA level have been found to play key roles in the pathophysiology, diagnosis, monitoring and prognosis of these tumors. It has been shown over the last 20 years that recurrent chromosomal rearrangements are strongly associated with the activation of oncogenes, acquisition of drug resistance and loss of tumor suppressor gene function. Chromosomal alterations have also been shown to characterize many solid tumors, including epithelial ovarian cancer [Cancer Res. 62 (2002) 3466; Cancer 91 (2001) 534; Genes Chromosomes Cancer 25 (1999) 290]. Despite these findings, however, there are currently few examples of specific cytogenetic studies that have contributed to the clinical management of solid tumors such as ovarian cancer. The limiting factor to date is the resolution of available techniques. With time, as the technology improves, so will our ability to focus on specific findings that may be applicable to future clinical management. The intention of this report is to familiarize the reader with the evolution of cytogenetic and molecular cytogenetic techniques used in the study of ovarian cancer, the early formulations from these studies and their use in answering specific clinical questions such as association with pathologic subtype, the relevance of drug resistance, the impact of BRCA mutations, and finally to guide the reader into the future of this ever growing field.

Neonatal effects of patient-controlled analgesia using fentanyl in labor.

Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) has been used at our institution for the past 5 years, as an alternative labor analgesic when epidural analgesia is contraindicated. This retrospective study evaluates the effects of maternal PCA fentanyl on infants of greater than 32 weeks gestational age. The neonatal charts (n=32) were reviewed for birth weight, gestational age, 1 min and 5 min Apgar scores, use of naloxone and umbilical venous gases. Infants requiring naloxone were defined as narcotized. Results from narcotized and non-narcotized neonates were compared with the Wilcoxon two-sample test. Fourteen infants had a 1 min Apgar score or= 7, except in the three infants who had received naloxone. Gestational age, birth weight, method of delivery, PCA duration, time from last dose to delivery, total fentanyl used and rate of fentanyl infusion were not predictive of low 1 min Apgar scores. Three infants with a 1 min Apgar of 4 required naloxone. The total fentanyl received by mothers of infants who required naloxone was significantly higher than the group of mothers whose infants did not require naloxone (770 +/- 233 microg vs 298 +/- 287 microg, P = 0.027) Use of PCA fentanyl in this high-risk obstetric population was associated with a 44% incidence of moderately depressed neonates with an Apgar score