Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Child Abuse Negl ; 23(11): 1083-101, 1999 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10604064

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The major aim of this study was to determine the effect of characteristics of the case, the teacher, and the organizational setting on recognition and reporting of child abuse. METHOD: A factorial survey design was employed in which a probability sample of teachers (N = 480) responded to vignettes in which case characteristics were systematically manipulated. RESULTS: Analysis using OLS regression showed that case characteristics alone accounted for 50.30% of the variance in recognition and 51.08% of the variance in reporting: the strongest effects were from type and seriousness of abuse, positive behavior of the victim and positive psychology of the perpetrator. The inclusion of variables describing the teachers and the school explained only a very small additional proportion of the variance in teacher's responses. CONCLUSIONS: Teachers responses to child abuse are relatively unbiased by either the extraneous characteristics of the perpetrator or victim, the responding teacher, or the school setting. The findings do not appear to support the problem of "overreporting." There is evidence for "underreporting," particularly in less serious cases involving physical and emotional abuse. Teachers are undeterred by the many problems and fears that may accompany a report of child abuse to Child Protective Services. Teachers use discretion in reporting abuse they recognize.


Subject(s)
Child Abuse/diagnosis , Teaching , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Child , Child Abuse/psychology , Child, Preschool , Factor Analysis, Statistical , Female , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Interpersonal Relations , Male , Middle Aged
2.
Public Health Nurs ; 13(5): 337-44, 1996 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8918174

ABSTRACT

The concept of diagnostic work (A. Strauss, S. Fagerhaugh, B. Suczek, & C. Wiener, 1985) is used to explore nurses' responses to potential child abuse. A total of 1,036 nurses (response rate of 67%) completed a mailed questionnaire that included open-ended qualitative-type questions about a hypothetical situation involving possible child abuse. We report their judgments regarding information presented in the hypothetical situation and additional information they requested to make the diagnosis. Nurses focused primarily on the child's injuries and behavior and wanted more information about the abuse event. Diagnostic work was then analyzed by specialty group: community health, school health, emergency, and pediatric nursing. Nurses' specialization influenced the choice of information that was determined to be decisive and the additional information desired to make a diagnosis.


Subject(s)
Child Abuse/diagnosis , Nursing Diagnosis/methods , Adult , Child , Community Health Nursing , Emergency Nursing , Female , Humans , Male , Nursing Diagnosis/standards , Nursing Methodology Research , Pediatric Nursing , Reproducibility of Results , School Nursing , Surveys and Questionnaires
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...