Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Ticks Tick Borne Dis ; 7(1): 193-198, 2016 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26565931

ABSTRACT

Large commercial laboratories in the United States were surveyed regarding the number of specimens tested for eight tickborne diseases in 2008. Seven large commercial laboratories reported testing a total of 2,927,881 specimens nationally (including Lyme disease). Of these, 495,585 specimens (17%) were tested for tickborne diseases other than Lyme disease. In addition to large commercial laboratories, another 1051 smaller commercial, hospital, and government laboratories in four states (CT, MD, MN, and NY) were surveyed regarding tickborne disease testing frequency, practices, and results. Ninety-two of these reported testing a total of 10,091 specimens for four tickborne diseases other than Lyme disease. We estimate the cost of laboratory diagnostic testing for non-Lyme disease tickborne diseases in 2008 to be $9.6 million. These data provide a baseline to evaluate trends in tickborne disease test utilization and insight into the burden of these diseases.


Subject(s)
Immunologic Techniques/economics , Immunologic Techniques/methods , Laboratories/standards , Microscopy/economics , Microscopy/methods , Tick-Borne Diseases/diagnosis , Animals , Humans , Laboratories/economics , Tick-Borne Diseases/epidemiology , United States
2.
Ticks Tick Borne Dis ; 6(4): 435-8, 2015 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25920376

ABSTRACT

Ticks are the most significant vectors of infectious diseases in the United States, inspiring many researchers to study aspects of their biology, ecology, and their effects on public health. However, regional differences in tick abundance and pathogen infection prevalence result in the inability to assume results from one area are relevant in another. Current local information on tick ranges, infection rates, and human cases is needed to assess tick-borne disease risk in any given region. The Mid-Atlantic Tick Summit III brought together over 100 area experts and researchers to share regional updates on ticks and their associated pathogens. We report some meeting highlights here. Regional meetings foster cross-disciplinary collaborations that benefit the community, and open novel lines of inquiry so that tick-bite risk can be reduced and tick-borne diseases can be treated effectively.


Subject(s)
Arachnid Vectors/physiology , Tick-Borne Diseases/transmission , Ticks/physiology , Animals , Humans , Information Dissemination , Mid-Atlantic Region , Public Health , Tick-Borne Diseases/epidemiology , Tick-Borne Diseases/parasitology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...