Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
2.
Eur J Epidemiol ; 10(4): 513-4, 1994 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7843372

ABSTRACT

The epidemiological situation calls for almost yearly changes in the antigenic composition of influenza vaccine, thus necessitating fresh licensing procedures. Since the time for bringing a new vaccine onto the market should be relatively short, the following work of all parties involved must be done expeditiously: 1) WHO recommendations on new virus strains and their subsequent adaptation by the EEC (February/March); 2) Distribution of the new virus strains to the International Reference Centers for Influenza in the UK and USA (February/March); the centers later issue reference materials for the determination of the haemagglutinin antigen concentration (April/May); 3) Production and testing of seed virus by manufacturers, as well as validation of the producer's inactivation process for the new virus strains (May/June); 4) Licensing of the vaccines by the National Control Authority (Paul-Ehrlich-Institute) (June/July); in the case of previously licensed products, the procedure is limited essentially to the approval of the detailed protocol of production and tests on the new virus strains, clinical studies not being required before licensing because of a lack of time; 5) Paul-Ehrlich-Institute's test for batch release, according to Directive 89/342/EEC, besides protocol approval, conducts material testing of the endotoxin and antigen content of each vaccine lot; the assay for the antigen quantification is especially laborious and sometimes must be repeated because of test invalidity.


Subject(s)
Drug Industry/legislation & jurisprudence , Drug and Narcotic Control , European Union , Influenza Vaccines , Licensure , Antigens, Viral/immunology , Drug Approval , Europe , Germany , Hemagglutinins, Viral/immunology , Humans , Influenza Vaccines/chemical synthesis , Influenza Vaccines/immunology , Influenza Vaccines/standards , International Cooperation , Orthomyxoviridae/classification , Orthomyxoviridae/immunology , United Kingdom , United States , Vaccines, Attenuated/chemical synthesis , Vaccines, Attenuated/immunology , Vaccines, Attenuated/standards , World Health Organization
3.
Immun Infekt ; 12(4): 201-7, 1984 Aug.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-6090309

ABSTRACT

Neutralizing antibodies against measles, poliomyelitis, rubella, herpes simplex, influenza and vaccinia viruses were measured in batches of a representative selection of human immunoglobulins for intravenous use licensed in the Federal Republic of Germany. Rubella antibodies were also examined by haemagglutination-inhibition tests. Where available, reference preparations were used, and antibody levels expressed in I. U. All preparations contained significant amounts of the examined antibodies, with relatively low variation from one batch to the other. In most cases activity data specified by the manufacturers could be confirmed. However, differences between the various preparations were sometimes important, some of them relating mainly to individual antibodies, others more or less to the whole range. Some striking findings are emphasized with consideration of manufacturing and control problems.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/analysis , Blood Transfusion , Immunoglobulins/analysis , Germany, West , Hemagglutination Inhibition Tests , Humans , Immunoglobulins/administration & dosage , Infusions, Parenteral , Measles virus/immunology , Orthomyxoviridae/immunology , Poliovirus/immunology , Rubella virus/immunology , Simplexvirus/immunology , Vaccinia virus/immunology
4.
Dev Biol Stand ; 39: 219-222, 1977.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-604100

ABSTRACT

The anti-ovalbumin sensitizing ability of four highly purified commercial influenza vaccines was tested in guinea pigs by means of passive cutaneous anaphylaxis. Aluminimum-adsorbed and fluid vaccines as well as pretreatments by one or two subcutaneous inoculations were compared. The two adsorbed vaccines induced significant sensitization after just one inoculation while the two fluid vaccines revealed their sensitizing ability almost exclusively after repeated administration.


Subject(s)
Influenza Vaccines , Orthomyxoviridae/immunology , Ovalbumin/immunology , Animals , Antibodies/analysis , Antibodies, Viral , Guinea Pigs , Immunization, Secondary , Passive Cutaneous Anaphylaxis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...