Immunotherapy in Glioblastoma: Current Shortcomings and Future Perspectives.

Glioblastomas are aggressive, fast-growing primary brain tumors. After standard-of-care treatment with radiation in combination with temozolomide, the overall prognosis of newly diagnosed patients remains poor, with a 2-year survival rate of less than 20%. The remarkable survival benefit gained with immunotherapy in several extracranial tumor types spurred a variety of experimental intervention studies in glioblastoma patients. These ranged from immune checkpoint inhibition to vaccinations and adoptive T cell therapies. Unfortunately, almost all clinical outcomes were universally disappointing. In this perspective, we provide an overview of immune interventions performed to date in glioblastoma patients and re-evaluate their performance. We argue that shortcomings of current immune therapies in glioblastoma are related to three major determinants of resistance, namely: low immunogenicity; immune privilege of the central nervous system; and immunosuppressive micro-environment. In this perspective, we propose strategies that are guided by exact shortcomings to sensitize glioblastoma prior to treatment with therapies that enhance numbers and/or activation state of CD8 T cells.

Low-grade glioma harbors few CD8 T cells, which is accompanied by decreased expression of chemo-attractants, not immunogenic antigens.

In multiple tumor types, prediction of response to immune therapies relates to the presence, distribution and activation state of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). Although such therapies are, to date, unsuccessful in gliomas, little is known on the immune contexture of TILs in these tumors. We assessed whether low and high-grade glioma (LGG and HGG, grade II and IV respectively) differ with respect to number, location and tumor reactivity of TILs; as well as expression of molecules involved in the trafficking and activation of T cells. Intra-tumoral CD8 T cells were quantified by flow cytometry (LGG: n = 12; HGG: n = 8) and immunofluorescence (LGG: n = 28; HGG: n = 28). Neoantigen load and expression of Cancer Germline Antigens (CGAs) were assessed using whole exome sequencing and RNA-seq. TIL-derived DNA was sequenced and the variable domain of the TCRß chain was classified according to IMGT nomenclature. QPCR was used to determine expression of T cell-related genes. CD8 T cell numbers were significantly lower in LGG and, in contrast to HGG, mainly remained in close vicinity to blood vessels. This was accompanied by lower expression of chemo-attractants CXCL9, CXCL10 and adhesion molecule ICAM1. We did not observe a difference in the number of expressed neoantigens or CGAs, nor in diversity of TCR-Vß gene usage. In summary, LGG have lower numbers of intra-tumoral CD8 T cells compared to HGG, potentially linked to decreased T cell trafficking. We have found no evidence for distinct tumor reactivity of T cells in either tumor type. The near absence of TILs in LGG suggest that, at present, checkpoint inhibitors are unlikely to have clinical efficacy in this tumor type.

Lack of B and T cell reactivity towards IDH1R132H in blood and tumor tissue from LGG patients.

PURPOSE: Mutations in the isocitrate dehydrogenase-1 gene (IDH1) occur at high frequency in grade II-III gliomas (LGGs). IDH1 mutations are somatic, missense and heterozygous affecting codon 132 in the catalytic pocket of the enzyme. In LGG, most mutations (90%) result in an arginine to histidine substitution (IDH1R132H) providing a neo-epitope that is expressed in all tumor cells. To assess the immunogenic nature of this epitope, and its potential use to develop T cell treatments, we measured IDH1R132H-specific B and T cell reactivity in blood and tumor tissue of LGG patients. METHODS: Sera from IDH1R132H-mutated LGG patients (n = 27) were assayed for the presence of a neo-specific antibody response using ELISA. In addition, PBMCs (n = 36) and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs, n = 10) were measured for T cell activation markers and IFN-γ production by flow cytometry and ELISA. In some assays, frequencies of CD4 T cells specific for mutated peptide presented by HLA-DR were enriched prior to T cell monitoring assays. RESULTS: Despite high sensitivity of our assay, we failed to detect IDH1R132H-specific IgG in sera of LGG patients. Similarly, we did not observe CD4 T cell reactivity towards IDH1R132H in blood, neither did we observe such reactivity following pre-enrichment of frequencies of IDH1R132H-specific CD4 T cells. Finally, we did not detect IDH1R132H-specific CD4 T cells among TILs. CONCLUSIONS: The absence of both humoral and cellular responses in blood and tumors of LGG patients indicates that IDH1R132H is not sufficiently immunogenic and devaluates its further therapeutic exploitation, at least in the majority of LGG patients.

PI3 kinase mutations and mutational load as poor prognostic markers in diffuse glioma patients.

INTRODUCTION: Recent advances in molecular diagnostics allow diffuse gliomas to be classified based on their genetic changes into distinct prognostic subtypes. However, a systematic analysis of all molecular markers has thus far not been performed; most classification schemes use a predefined and select set of genes/molecular markers. Here, we have analysed the TCGA dataset (combined glioblastoma (GBM) and lower grade glioma (LGG) datasets) to identify all prognostic genetic markers in diffuse gliomas in order to generate a comprehensive classification scheme. RESULTS: Of the molecular markers investigated (all genes mutated at a population frequency >1.7 % and frequent chromosomal imbalances) in the entire glioma dataset, 57 were significantly associated with overall survival. Of these, IDH1 or IDH2 mutations are associated with lowest hazard ratio, which confirms IDH as the most important prognostic marker in diffuse gliomas. Subsequent subgroup analysis largely confirms many of the currently used molecular classification schemes for diffuse gliomas (ATRX or TP53 mutations, 1p19q codeletion). Our analysis also identified PI3-kinase mutations as markers of poor prognosis in IDH-mutated + ATRX/TP53 mutated diffuse gliomas, median survival 3.7 v. 6.3 years (P = 0.02, Hazard rate (HR) 2.93, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.16 - 7.38). PI3-kinase mutations were also prognostic in two independent datasets. In our analysis, no additional molecular markers were identified that further refine the molecular classification of diffuse gliomas. Interestingly, these molecular classifiers do not fully explain the variability in survival observed for diffuse glioma patients. We demonstrate that tumor grade remains an important prognostic factor for overall survival in diffuse gliomas, even within molecular glioma subtypes. Tumor grade was correlated with the mutational load (the number of non-silent mutations) of the tumor: grade II diffuse gliomas harbour fewer genetic changes than grade III or IV, even within defined molecular subtypes (e.g. ATRX mutated diffuse gliomas). CONCLUSION: We have identified PI3K mutations as novel prognostic markers in gliomas. We also demonstrate that the mutational load is associated with tumor grade. The increase in mutational load may partially explain the increased aggressiveness of higher grade diffuse gliomas when a subset of the affected genes actively contributes to gliomagenesis and/or progression.