Warning criteria for MEP monitoring during carotid endarterectomy: a retrospective study of 571 patients.

Monitoring of transcranial electrical motor evoked potentials (tcMEP) during carotid endarterectomy (CEA) has been shown to effectively detect intraoperative cerebral ischemia. The unique purpose of this study was to evaluate changes of MEP amplitude (AMP), area under the curve (AUC) and signal morphology (MOR) as additional MEP warning criteria for clamping-associated ischemia during CEA. Therefore, the primary outcome was the number of MEP alerts (AMP, AUC and MOR) in the patients without postoperative motor deficit (false positives). We retrospectively reviewed data from 571 patients who received CEA under general anesthesia. Monitoring of somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP) and tcMEP was performed in all cases (all-or-none MEP warning criteria). The percentages of false positives (primary parameter) of AMP, AUC and MOR were evaluated according to the postoperative motor outcome. In the cohort of 562 patients, we found significant SSEP/MEP changes in 56 patients (9.96%). In 44 cases (7.83%) a shunt was inserted. Nine patients (1.57%) were excluded due to MEP recording failure. False positives were registered for AMP, AUC and MOR changes in 121 (24.01%), 148 (29.36%) and 165 (32.74%) patients, respectively. In combination of AMP/AUC and AMP/AUC/MOR false positives were found in 9.52% and 9.33% of the patients. This study is the first to evaluate the correctness of the MEP warning criteria AMP, AUC and MOR with regard to false positive monitoring results in the context of CEA. All additional MEP warning criteria investigated produced an unacceptably high number of false positives and therefore may not be useful in carotid surgery for adequate detection of clamping-associated ischemia.

Towards Safe Infrared Nerve Stimulation: A Systematic Experimental Approach.

Neural activation by infrared nerve stimulation (INS) gains growing interest as a potential alternative to conventional electric nerve stimulation, since unambiguous advantages like contact-free operation, enhanced spatial selectivity and lack of (electrical) stimulation artifacts are promising for both future electrophysiological research and clinical application. For the systematic investigation of laser nerve activation, we recently introduced a novel experimental approach. Comprising a defined focused beam profile, it enables remote controlled, contact-free pulsed laser stimulation of the rat sciatic nerve, simultaneous to high-speed temperature measurement in vivo. Up to now, successful neural activation with single laser pulses (2 - 6 mJ) was observed in all performed experiments, however, it strongly depended on the particular nerve location. Hence, we depict the investigation of spatial dependency of the nerve response and identify `regions of excitability' on the nerve surface, that are highly susceptible to INS. By means of thermal imaging, we simultaneously monitored the nerve surface temperature, where we observed progressing temperature build-up during single pulse stimulation with repetition rates above 4 Hz. In this work, we present current results of our ongoing research.

Extracorporeal Stimulation of Sacral Nerve Roots for Observation of Pelvic Autonomic Nerve Integrity: Description of a Novel Methodological Setup.

INTRODUCTION: Neurophysiologic monitoring can improve autonomic nerve sparing during critical phases of rectal cancer surgery. OBJECTIVES: To develop a system for extracorporeal stimulation of sacral nerve roots. METHODS: Dedicated software controlled a ten-electrode stimulation array by switching between different electrode configurations and current levels. A built-in impedance and current level measurement assessed the effectiveness of current injection. Intra-anal surface electromyography (sEMG) informed on targeting the sacral nerve roots. All tests were performed on five pig specimens. RESULTS: During switching between electrode configurations, the system delivered 100% of the set current (25 mA, 30 Hz, 200 µs cathodic pulses) in 93% of 250 stimulation trains across all specimens. The impedance measured between single stimulation array contacts and corresponding anodes across all electrode configurations and specimens equaled 3.7 ± 2.5 kΩ. The intra-anal sEMG recorded a signal amplitude increase as previously observed in the literature. When the stimulation amplitude was tested in the range from 1 to 21 mA using the interconnected contacts of the stimulation array and the intra-anal anode, the impedance remained below 250 Ω and the system delivered 100% of the set current in all cases. Intra-anal sEMG showed an amplitude increase for current levels exceeding 6 mA. CONCLUSION: The system delivered stable electric current, which was proved by built-in impedance and current level measurements. Intra-anal sEMG confirmed the ability to target the branches of the autonomous nervous system originating from the sacral nerve roots. SIGNIFICANCE: Stimulation outside of the operative field during rectal cancer surgery is feasible and may improve the practicality of pelvic intraoperative neuromonitoring.