[Acceptance evaluation of urine self-sampling, vaginal self-sampling and physician sampling in cervical cancer screening].

Objective: To compare the acceptance of urine self-sampling, vaginal self-sampling and physician sampling in cervical cancer screening. Methods: Questionnaire surveys were conducted in women attending cervical cancer screening in Xiangyuan County and Yangcheng County in Shanxi Province from July to November 2015 and from October to December 2018. Both surveys included the following three parts: feelings and acceptance of women in urine self-sampling, vaginal self-sampling and physician sampling, and the ease evaluation of two self-samplings. Results: There were 3 485 questionnaires were collected finally. The proportions of women felt embarrassed in urine self-sampling, vaginal self-sampling and physician sampling were 2.3% (81/3 472), 7.1% (247/3 472) and 8.6% (299/3 472), and 1.3% (46/3 472), 9.7%(3 37/3 472) and 14.9% (518/3 472) of women felt uncomfortable, and 1.0% (35/3 469), 8.5% (295/3 469) and 15.3% (531/3 469) felt pain, and 98.3% (3 334/3 393), 96.3% (3 267/3 393) and 99.0% (3 360/3 393) thought that the sampling were conducted properly (P<0.05). Based on the feeling during sample collection, 61.2% (1 876/3 064), 39.1% (1 199/3 064) and 66.5% (2 037/3 064) women were willing to use the corresponded sampling methods in cervical cancer screening, respectively (P<0.05). If the accuracy was the same, there were 31.8% (1 109/3 485) women preferred self-sampling and 68.2% (2 376/3 485) preferred physician sampling for cervical cancer screening. Meanwhile, 23.5% (820/3 482) preferred vaginal self-sampling in comparison with 76.5% (2 662/3 482) for urine self-sampling in cervical cancer screening. 86.5% (3 007/3 478) of the women thought urine self-sampling was very easy, comparing 40.9% (1 423/3 478) for vaginal self-sampling. Conclusions: The bad feeling of women during urine self-sampling is less common and less serious than those during physician sampling and vaginal self-sampling, and the acceptance for physician sampling is highest, following by urine self-sampling and vaginal self-sampling. Urine self-sampling is much easier than vaginal self-sampling.

Role of visfatin in promoting proliferation and invasion of colorectal cancer cells by downregulating SDF-1/CXCR4-mediated miR-140-3p expression.

OBJECTIVE: Visfatin is significantly upregulated in colorectal cancer (CRC). However, its exact role in CRC progression and the regulatory mechanism involved in this process have not been fully illuminated. The aim of this study was to investigate the roles of visfatin in CRC progression and the potential molecular mechanism. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In vitro, two CRC cell lines (DLD-1 and SW480) were transfected with visfatin, si-visfatin, and their control vectors. Some cells were transfected with miR-140-3p mimics or miRNA negative control. Cell Counting Kit-8 and transwell invasive assays were used to detect cell proliferation and invasion ability. Luciferase reporter assays were performed to confirm whether CXC motif chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) directly targets miR-140-3p. Western blotting and qRT-PCR analyses were respectively conducted to evaluate the protein and mRNA levels of stromal cell-derived factor-1 (SDF-1) and CXCR4. In vivo, DLD-1 cells transfected with visfatin construct or vector control were inoculated into nude mice. After 5 weeks, the mice were sacrificed, and the tumor nodules were weighed. The expression of visfatin, SDF-1, and CXCR4 in tumor tissues was detected via immunohistochemistry analysis. RESULTS: In vitro, the transfection of visfatin promoted the proliferation and invasion of CRC cells, as well as upregulated the expression of SDF-1/CXCR4. MiR-140-3p directly targets the 3'untranslated region of CXCR4. MiR-140-3p expression was downregulated by treatment with visfatin, and miR-140-3p exerted similar effects to those of visfatin knockdown on the proliferation and invasion of CRC cells. In vivo, visfatin stimulated CRC tumor growth and downregulated miR-140-3p expression, whereas it upregulated SDF-1/CXCR4 expression. CONCLUSIONS: Visfatin promotes CRC progression by downregulating the SDF-1/CXCR4-mediated expression of miR-140-3p both in vitro and in vivo.