Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
J Clin Med ; 11(11)2022 May 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35683493

ABSTRACT

Blood purification by hemoadsorption therapy seems to improve outcomes in selected patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Here, we report the successful application of hemoadsorption in the severe systemic inflammatory response during coronary artery bypass surgery in a patient with reactivated herpes zoster.

2.
J Card Surg ; 36(4): 1226-1231, 2021 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33491207

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) techniques are increasingly being adopted into clinical routine for various risk groups. Coronary artery disease (CAD) is seen in up to 75% of patients with severe aortic valve stenosis (AS) presenting with typical angina pectoris. Due to high mortality rates and procedural complications in these patients, a hybrid concept of simultaneous transaortic TAVI and off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) can be a feasible treatment option. METHODS: Between April 2014 and July 2020, 10 consecutive high-risk patients underwent concomitant transaortic TAVI and OPCAB at our institution. All indications were discussed in Heart Team and decisions were made based on patients' comorbidities and complexity of CAD. The study endpoints were 30-day mortality, device success, and development of postoperative adverse events defined by the Valve Academic Research Consorium. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 77.9 ± 7.1 years old. All patients presented with multiple comorbidities (mean logistic EuroSCORE 26.5 ± 12.3%, median EuroSCORE II 5.13% [interquartile range 4.2-9.5], mean STS-Score 6.04 ± 1.6%). Five patients (50%) presented with porcelain aorta. No conversion to conventional procedures was needed. 30-day mortality occurred in one patient (10%). Complete revascularization was achieved in seven (70%) of the patients. Device success rate was 100%. No paravalvular leakage was detected. No stroke, myocardial infarction or vascular complications were observed. CONCLUSIONS: A hybrid approach combining transaortic TAVI and OPCAB might be a safe and feasible method of treatment in high-risk patients presenting with severe AS and CAD who are not eligible for conventional surgical or interventional solutions.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis , Coronary Artery Bypass, Off-Pump , Coronary Artery Disease , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation , Heart Valve Prosthesis , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aortic Valve/surgery , Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Coronary Artery Disease/surgery , Humans , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome
3.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol ; 39(12): 1344-1350, 2016 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27862030

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Reveal LINQ™ implantable cardiac monitor (ICM; Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) is obviously smaller than its precursor (the Reveal XT™), but little is known about its long-term safety. Here, we investigated the long-term R-wave sensing reliability of the Reveal LINQ™ ICM. METHODS: We analyzed the sensing quality of the Reveal LINQ™ ICM over time between March 2014 and January 2015. RESULTS: A total of 30 patients underwent Reveal LINQ™ implantation. The main reason for implantation was unexplained syncope (60%). We evaluated a total of 305.8 patient-months (median, 10.7 months) of R-wave sensing quality. A comparison of baseline and follow-up R-wave sensing values revealed no difference (0.401 mV ± 0.244 mV vs 0.447 mV ± 0.323 mV; P = 0.225). CONCLUSIONS: The consistent detection of events is an important safety feature of an ICM and linked to secure R-wave sensing. Despite the noticeable size reduction, the Reveal LINQ™ ICM retains reliable sensing quality over time.


Subject(s)
Arrhythmias, Cardiac/diagnosis , Electrocardiography, Ambulatory/instrumentation , Equipment Safety , Patient Satisfaction , Prostheses and Implants , Wireless Technology/instrumentation , Equipment Design , Equipment Failure , Equipment Failure Analysis , Female , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Miniaturization , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Syncope/diagnosis
5.
Perfusion ; 17(6): 401-6, 2002 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12470028

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Cardiac surgery on cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is associated with postoperative renal dysfunction and up to 4% of patients with normal preoperative renal function develop acute renal failure (ARF) requiring dialysis. According to recent investigations, CPB management is not evidence-based and, thus, current clinical CPB practice may favor renal dysfunction. The purpose of our study was to investigate if postcardiac surgery renal dysfunction is influenced by CPB management. METHODS: We selected three groups of patients with normal preoperative renal function who had been subjected to cardiac surgical procedures on CPB: 44 patients with postoperative ARF requiring hemofiltration/dialysis (ARF group), 51 patients with postoperative renal dysfunction not requiring hemofiltration/dialysis (serum creatinine increase > 0.5 mg/dl within 48 h postsurgery: CREA group), and 48 patients with normal postoperative renal function (Control group). The patients' on-line CPB records were analyzed for CPB duration, CPB perfusion pressure, CPB flow, and periods on CPB at a perfusion pressure <60 mmHg. On-CPB diuretic and vasoconstrictor medication was recorded. RESULTS: Patient demographics were similar for the three groups. In the ARF group, CPB duration was longer (166 +/- 77 [standard deviation, SD] min) compared to CREA (115 +/- 41 min; p < 0.001) and to Control groups (107 +/- 40 min; p < 0.001), and mean CPB flow was lower (2.35 +/- 0.36 l/min/m2) compared to CREA (2.61 +/- 0.35 l/min/m2; p = 0.0015) and to Control groups (2.51 +/- 0.33 l/min/m2; p = 0.09). Mean arterial pressure on CPB (ARF: 61 +/- 10; CREA: 60 +/- 7; CONTROL: 63 +/- 9 mmHg; p = 0.19) as well as furosemide and norepinephrine medication on CPB were similar for the groups. Compared to Control (46 +/- 26 min), CPB duration at arterial pressures <60 mmHg was longer in ARF (78 +/- 60 min; p = 0.034) and in CREA (62 +/- 36 min;p = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that current clinical CPB management impacts postoperative renal function. We found that patients with normal preoperative renal function who developed postoperative ARF had longer CPB duration, lower CPB perfusion flow, and longer periods on CPB at pressures < 60 mmHg compared to patients with no post CPB ARF. However, our data do not allow us to separate these CPB-related factors from the potential influence of perioperative low cardiac output syndrome as a cause for postoperative ARF. Thus, future clinical studies are required to elucidate CPB-induced ARF and to optimize CPB management for ARF prevention.


Subject(s)
Acute Kidney Injury/etiology , Cardiac Surgical Procedures , Cardiopulmonary Bypass/adverse effects , Acute Kidney Injury/therapy , Aged , Blood Pressure , Creatinine/blood , Critical Care , Female , Humans , Intraoperative Period , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Period , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...