Neuropathic injury to the levator ani occurs in 1 in 4 primiparous women.

OBJECTIVE: We measured levator ani neuromuscular function before and after first delivery to identify the location, timing, and mechanism of injury. STUDY DESIGN: Fifty-eight primiparous women underwent electromyographic examination of the levator ani antepartum at 6 weeks and 6 months after the delivery. Antepartum turns/amplitude data were pooled to create a normal range. We calculated each woman's percentage of outliers from this range and assessed relationships between delivery and extent of injury. RESULTS: At 6 weeks, 14 of 58 women (24.1%) had neuropathy, with 9 of those 14 women recovering by 6 months. At 6 months, 17 of 58 women (29.3%) were neuropathic, which included 12 new injuries. Women who had elective cesarean delivery had virtually no injury, but all other modes of delivery had similar injury rates. CONCLUSION: Obstetric delivery is associated frequently with electromyographic evidence of neuropathic injury to the levator ani. The entire levator complex is at risk, and cesarean delivery while in labor is not protective.

The standardization of terminology for researchers in female pelvic floor disorders.

The lack of standardized terminology in pelvic floor disorders (pelvic organ prolapse, urinary incontinence, and fecal incontinence) is a major obstacle to performing and interpreting research. The National Institutes of Health convened the Terminology Workshop for Researchers in Female Pelvic Floor Disorders to: (1) agree on standard terms for defining conditions and outcomes; (2) make recommendations for minimum data collection for research; and (3) identify high priority issues for future research. Pelvic organ prolapse was defined by physical examination staging using the International Continence Society system. Stress urinary incontinence was defined by symptoms and testing; 'cure' was defined as no stress incontinence symptoms, negative testing, and no new problems due to intervention. Overactive bladder was defined as urinary frequency and urgency, with and without urge incontinence. Detrusor instability was defined by cystometry. For all urinary symptoms, defining 'improvement' after intervention was identified as a high priority. For fecal incontinence, more research is needed before recommendations can be made. A standard terminology for research on pelvic floor disorders is presented and areas of high priority for future research are identified.

Cost-effectiveness of universal cystoscopy to identify ureteral injury at hysterectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of routine cystoscopy at the time of abdominal, vaginal, and laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy in terms of cost per ureteral injury identified and treated. METHODS: Using a hospital-based perspective, a decision-analysis model was constructed to estimate the outcomes and costs of cystoscopy or no cystoscopy at the time of abdominal hysterectomy. A similar model was constructed for vaginal and laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy to account for the cost of conversion to laparotomy. Cost estimates were based on estimated costs of Duke University Medical Center and from average Medicare reimbursements for similar Diagnostic Related Groups from the Health Care Financing Administration. The incidence of ureteral injury was obtained from a review of the literature. Sensitivity analyses were performed for the following variables: ureteral injury rate, silent ureteral injury rate, cost of cystoscopy, and cost of therapeutic interventions. We assumed a silent renal death rate of 0%. RESULTS: Routine cystoscopy at abdominal hysterectomy was cost-saving above a threshold ureteral injury rate of 1.5%. At a ureteral injury rate of 0.2%, the marginal increase in the cost of routine intraoperative cystoscopy was $108 per abdominal hysterectomy, with an associated cost of $54,000 per ureteral injury identified. In comparison, at a ureteral injury rate of 2%, routine cystoscopy gave a marginal cost savings of $44 per hysterectomy, with a cost savings of $2200 per ureteral injury identified intraoperatively. At the baseline ureteral injury rate of 0.5%, routine cystoscopy had a marginally increased cost of $83 per hysterectomy, with an incremental cost-effectiveness of $16,600 spent per ureteral injury identified. The model constructed for vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy yielded a threshold ureteral injury rate of 2%, above which routine cystoscopy was cost-saving. In both models, the incidence of ureteral injury and the cost of readmission were the two variables with the greatest influence on cost-effectiveness. CONCLUSION: The cost-effectiveness of routine intraoperative cystoscopy depends on the rate of ureteral injury independent of the route of hysterectomy. If that rate exceeds 1.5% for abdominal hysterectomy and 2% for vaginal or laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy, then routine cystoscopy is cost-effective.

Effectiveness of laparoscopic cadaveric dissection in enhancing resident comprehension of pelvic anatomy.

BACKGROUND: Anatomic instruction during preclinical years of medical school has been in decline recently. There is evidence that residents already lose a considerable portion of basic anatomic knowledge in the transition from student to clinician, and this deficit is even more dramatic in residents who start their training with a decreased understanding of anatomy. We questioned whether anatomy could be adequately retaught to new residents as surgical anatomy. In an effort to address this deficiency, we developed a program to teach pelvic anatomy in fresh cadavers using a laparoscopic approach. The purpose of this investigation is to determine if such a program is effective in enhancing residents' pelvic anatomy comprehension. STUDY DESIGN: An obstetrics and gynecology residency was divided into intervention (n = 15) and control (n = 13) groups. The intervention was a 4-hour laparoscopic dissection in a fresh cadaver. Outcomes measures included a multiple-choice test, practical exam, faculty evaluation, and satisfaction assessment. The faculty evaluation and satisfaction assessment used a visual analog scale. Univarate and nonparametric analysis were used when appropriate. RESULTS: Initial test scores (p = 0.32), faculty evaluations (p = 0.25), and satisfaction scores (p = 0.17) were similar. Both groups improved their anatomic knowledge based on test scores (p = 0.004) and faculty evaluations (p < 0.001), and final test scores were not significantly different (p = 0.19). Data measured on a 10-cm visual analog scale suggested higher faculty evaluations in the intervention group (14mm versus 10.3mm, (p = 0.23). Similarly there were higher scores on the cadaver test in the intervention group (65% versus 50%), (p = 0.13). The intervention group was significantly more satisfied with their anatomic training (16.1 mm versus-10.1 mm, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study did not have sufficient power to demonstrate that a single laparoscopic cadaveric dissection improves cognitive measures of anatomic perception, but suggested that it improves spatial perception of anatomy and is perceived by residents to be a valuable educational approach.

Vaginal mesh erosion after abdominal sacral colpopexy.

OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to compare the prevalence of vaginal mesh erosion between abdominal sacral colpopexy and various sacral colpoperineopexy procedures. STUDY DESIGN: We undertook a retrospective analysis of all sacral colpopexies and colpoperineopexies performed between March 1, 1992, and February 28, 1999. The patients were divided into the following 4 groups: abdominal sacral colpopexy, abdominal sacral colpoperineopexy, and 2 combined vaginal and abdominal colpoperineopexy groups, one with vaginal suture passage and the other with vaginal mesh placement. Survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards models were developed to examine erosion rates and time to erosion between groups. RESULTS: A total of 273 abdominal sacral vault suspensions were performed with the use of permanent synthetic mesh. There were 155 abdominal sacral colpopexies and 88 abdominal sacral colpoperineopexies. Among the 30 combined abdominal-vaginal procedures, 25 had sutures attached to the perineal body and brought into the abdominal field and 5 had mesh placed vaginally and brought into the abdominal field. Overall, mesh erosion was observed in 5.5% (15/273). The prevalence of mesh erosion was 3.2% (5/155) in the abdominal sacral colpopexy group and 4.5% (5/88) in the abdominal sacral colpoperineopexy group (P not significant). The rates of erosion when sutures or mesh was placed vaginally were 16% (4/25) and 40% (2/5), respectively, and were significantly increased in comparison with the rates for abdominal sacral colpopexy (hazard ratio, 5.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.6-18.0; P = .005; vs hazard ratio, 19.7; 95% confidence interval, 3.8-101.5; P < .001). These variables retained their significance after we controlled for other independent variables, including age, concomitant hysterectomy, concomitant posterior repair, and estrogen status. The median time to mesh erosion was 15.6 months for abdominal sacral colpopexy, 12.4 months for abdominal sacral colpoperineopexy, 9.0 months in the suture-only group (P < .005), and 4.1 months in the vaginal mesh group (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: The rate of mesh erosion is higher and the time to mesh erosion is shorter with combined vaginal-abdominal sacral colpoperineopexy with vaginal suture and vaginal mesh placement in comparison with abdominal sacral colpopexy.

Which women with stress incontinence require urodynamic evaluation?

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to determine the predictive value of the symptom of stress urinary incontinence and to evaluate the ability of other factors suggested by a published Agency for Health Care Policy and Research guideline for the discrimination of patients unlikely to require urodynamic testing before surgical management. STUDY DESIGN: We evaluated 950 consecutive women without advanced (stage III or IV) pelvic organ prolapse who were referred with symptoms of incontinence. Incontinence was recorded by means of standard forms and was characterized as "any stress loss" (76.4%), "primarily stress loss" (58.9%), "stress loss only" (29.8%), "stress and urge loss" (52.2%), "urge loss only" (13.8%), "constant and stress loss" (1.9%), or "constant loss" (2.3%). Other variables were assessed by means of a standardized history, physical examination (including urethral axis determination and stress test), 1-week urinary diary, and postvoid residual volume measurement. A urodynamic diagnosis of pure genuine stress incontinence was used as the criterion standard. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated. Logistic regression models incorporating various combinations of stress loss only, previous prolapse or incontinence surgery, nocturia, voiding frequency, urethral hypermobility, and postvoid residual volume <100 mL (the factors recommended by the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research guidelines), along with age and race as predictors of genuine stress incontinence, were constructed to evaluate the predictive ability of the guideline in a subset of 447 patients for whom data on all variables were available. RESULTS: Of the entire population 480 (50.5%) had pure genuine stress incontinence, 134 (14.1%) had both genuine stress incontinence and detrusor instability, 180 (18.9%) had pure detrusor instability, and 40 (4.2%) had intrinsic sphincter deficiency. Fifty-four (5.7%) had normal study results, and 62 (6.5%) had other nonincontinence diagnoses. Among the subjects with symptoms of stress loss only, 10.8% did not have genuine stress incontinence confirmed on urodynamic examination. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research guideline criteria had excellent discrimination (C statistic of 0.807) compared with the sole criterion of stress urinary incontinence only (C statistic of 0.574), with a positive predictive value of 85.7%. Only 7.8% of subjects met all the criteria, however, and 5.7% of these ultimately had a urodynamic diagnosis of either detrusor instability or normal study result. CONCLUSION: The predictive value of stress symptoms alone was not high enough to serve as the basis for surgical management. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research guidelines improved the predictive value but were applicable to only a small subset of patients referred with urinary incontinence.

Pelvic muscle electromyography of levator ani and external anal sphincter in nulliparous women and women with pelvic floor dysfunction.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare results of electromyographic assessment of muscular recruitment between nulliparous control subjects without pelvic floor dysfunction and parous subjects with genuine stress urinary incontinence and with pelvic organ prolapse. Interference pattern analysis is an electromyographic technique that reproducibly measures muscular recruitment by detecting both "turns" in the electromyographic signal produced by positive and negative peaks of the motor unit potentials and motor unit potential amplitude. Fewer turns can indicate loss of motor units or failure of central activation of contraction, whereas greater amplitude can indicate reinnervation after nerve damage. STUDY DESIGN: We performed concentric needle electrode electromyographic examinations of the levator ani and external anal sphincter in 15 nulliparous control subjects and 20 parous subjects with abnormalities (n = 9 with genuine stress urinary incontinence, n = 11 with stage III or IV pelvic organ prolapse). We made digital recordings at multiple sites at rest and with moderate and maximal contraction. Interference pattern analysis yielded the number of turns per second and the mean signal amplitude (in microvolts) for each site at each contraction level. We compared individual patient data with data from the healthy population by means of cloud analysis. Mean values of number of turns per second and mean amplitude in each group were then compared with nonparametric methods and regression models. RESULTS: Mean ages were 28.7 years (range, 20-49 years) for the control group, 54.3 years (range, 35-75 years) for subjects with genuine stress urinary incontinence, and 65 years (range, 41-77 years) for subjects with pelvic organ prolapse. Median clinical levator ani strengths were 9 (range, 5-9) in the control group, 5 (range, 2-7) in the genuine stress urinary incontinence group, and 5 (range, 2-8) in the pelvic organ prolapse group. Median external anal sphincter strengths were 9 (range, 7-9) in the control group, 5 (range, 3-9) in the genuine stress urinary incontinence group, and 8 (range, 4-9) in the pelvic organ prolapse group. The external anal sphincters of subjects with pelvic organ prolapse had the highest percentage of abnormal study results according to cloud analysis. Mean number of turns per second in levators was greater in control subjects than in subjects with abnormalities (P =.034). We found similar differences in number of turns per second for the external anal sphincter (P =.004). In contrast, we did not find differences between groups in mean amplitude in either the levator ani or the external anal sphincter. Comparison of patients with genuine stress urinary incontinence versus subjects with pelvic organ prolapse showed no significant difference in the number of turns per second in either muscle. Mean amplitude was greater in the pelvic organ prolapse group than in the genuine stress urinary incontinence group for both muscles (levator ani, P =.028; external anal sphincter, P =.048). Neither mean amplitude nor the number of turns per second could be predicted by clinically estimated levator ani strength, age, or fecal incontinence. CONCLUSION: Compared with nulliparous control subjects, patients with genuine stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse had changes in the levator ani and external anal sphincter consistent with either motor unit loss or failure of central activation, or both. Subjects with pelvic organ prolapse had findings consistent with greater recovery than was found in those with genuine stress urinary incontinence. Measures of recruitment by interference pattern analysis correlated better with clinical external anal sphincter strength than with levator ani strength and were independent of age.

Bilateral uterosacral ligament vaginal vault suspension with site-specific endopelvic fascia defect repair for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.

OBJECTIVE: The anatomic and functional success of suspension of the vaginal cuff to the proximal uterosacral ligaments is described. STUDY DESIGN: Forty-six women underwent vaginal site-specific repair of endopelvic fascia defects with suspension of the vaginal cuff to the proximal uterosacral ligaments for pelvic organ prolapse. Outcome measures included operative complications, pelvic organ prolapse quantitation, and assessment of pelvic floor symptoms. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 15.5 months (range, 3.5 months-3.4 years), 90% of patients had both resolution of vaginal bulging or prolapse symptoms and improvement of the stage of prolapse. There were improvements in all pelvic organ prolapse quantitation measurements except for total vaginal length, for which the median decrease was 0.75 cm. Intraoperatively, ureteral occlusion was noted in 11% (5/46) of patients with universal cystoscopy. In 3 patients the uterosacral suspension sutures were removed and replaced with resolution of the occlusion and in 2 patients ureteral reimplantation was required. Symptomatic prolapse (2 apical segment, 1 anterior, and 1 posterior) developed in 4 patients (10%), and 3 of them underwent reoperation. There were significant improvements in symptoms of bulging and pressure, voiding dysfunction, and vaginal and perineal splinting. CONCLUSION: Suspension of the vaginal vault to the proximal uterosacral ligaments combined with site-specific repair of endopelvic fascia defects provides excellent anatomic and functional correction of pelvic organ prolapse in most women. The risk of ureteral injury with this technique makes intraoperative cystoscopy essential.

Quantitative electromyographic analysis of levator ani and external anal sphincter muscles of nulliparous women.

OBJECTIVES: Our aims were to introduce a method of digital quantitative electromyography of the levator ani and external anal sphincter muscles and to establish reference values. STUDY DESIGN: Fifteen nulliparous, symptom-free women underwent concentric needle electromyographic examination of the levator ani and external anal sphincter. We sampled the levator ani transvaginally at 4 sites and the external anal sphincter at 2 sites. The signal was filtered and amplified, and digital recordings were made at 3 levels of voluntary activation at each site. Analyses of motor unit action potentials and interference patterns were performed with the use of these taped signals. Normal ranges were generated and compared with those established for other striated muscles. RESULTS: The mean age of the subjects was 28.7+/-7.5 years. A median of 24 motor unit action potentials was recorded in each levator ani, and a median of 6 was recorded in each external anal sphincter. Parameters of the levator ani action potentials were significantly greater than those of the external anal sphincter in amplitude (0.48 vs. 0.37 mV; P =.001), duration (10.40 vs. 8.27 ms; P =.002), number of turns per second (2. 80 vs. 2.28; P<.001), and area (0.65 vs. 0.36; P<.001). Parameters of the interference patterns were significantly greater in the levator ani than in the external anal sphincter in number of turns per second (241.6 vs. 183.9; P =.015), amplitude (302.7 vs. 225.3 microV; P<.0001), activity (95.6 vs 61.2; P =.004), envelope size (861.1 vs 567.6 microV; P<.0001), and number of small segments (105. 8 vs 81.4; P =.047). There were no significant differences between levator ani, external anal sphincter, and published parameters from the biceps muscle with regard to amplitude and duration of motor unit action potentials. CONCLUSIONS: Electromyography of the levator ani and external anal sphincter is feasible and well tolerated. Our findings confirm that the levator ani muscle has larger, more readily recruited motor units than does the external anal sphincter. Ranges for important quantitative electromyographic parameters for these muscles are similar to those published for the biceps.

A survey of pessary use by members of the American urogynecologic society.

OBJECTIVE: To describe trends in pessary use for pelvic organ prolapse. METHODS: An anonymous survey administered to the membership of the American Urogynecologic Society covered indications, management, and choice of pessary for specific support defects. RESULTS: The response rate was 48% (359 of 748). Two hundred fifty surveys were received at the scientific meeting and 109 were returned by mail. Seventy-seven percent used pessaries as first-line therapy for prolapse, while 12% reserved pessaries for women who were not surgical candidates. With respect to specific support defects, 89% used a pessary for anterior defects, 60% for posterior defects, 74% for apical defects, and 76% for complete procidentia. Twenty-two percent used the same pessary, usually a ring pessary, for all support defects. In the 78% who tailored the pessary to the defect, support pessaries were more common for anterior (ring) and apical defects (ring), while space-filling pessaries were more common for posterior defects (donut) and complete procidentia (Gellhorn). Less than half considered a prior hysterectomy or sexual activity contraindications for a pessary, while 64% considered hypoestrogenism a contraindication. Forty-four percent used a different pessary for women with a prior hysterectomy and 59% for women with a weak pelvic diaphragm. Ninety-two percent of physicians believed that pessaries relieve symptoms associated with pelvic organ prolapse, while 48% felt that pessaries also had therapeutic benefit in addition to relieving symptoms. CONCLUSION: While there are identifiable trends in pessary use, there is no clear consensus regarding the indications for support pessaries compared with space-filling pessaries, or the use of a single pessary for all support defects compared with tailoring the pessary to the specific defect. Randomized clinical trials are needed to define optimal pessary use.

Observed patient compliance with a structured outpatient bladder retraining program.

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to determine patient compliance with a telephone-based retraining program. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective study of 123 women with urinary urgency or urge incontinence who were offered bladder retraining with facsimile machine submission of a retraining diary and weekly telephone feedback. RESULTS: Completion was defined as having >/=4 follow-up sessions and >/=6 weeks of retraining. Seventy-one percent (87/123) began the retraining program; 63% (55/87) of them completed it, for an overall compliance rate of 45% (55/123). When we compared those who completed retraining with those who started but did not complete it, only concurrent use of pharmacologic therapy was significantly different (87% vs 53%, respectively; P <.001). This difference remained significant after we controlled for other independent variables, including urodynamic diagnosis and physician. CONCLUSIONS: A total of 55% of women to whom telephone-based bladder retraining was recommended either never started or were noncompliant with the treatment. Bladder retraining success in the "real world" may be substantially lower than that described in well-funded labor-intensive clinical trials.

Accuracy of clinical assessment of paravaginal defects in women with anterior vaginal wall prolapse.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the accuracy of clinical assessment of paravaginal defects in women with anterior vaginal wall prolapse. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective chart review of all women undergoing surgery for anterior vaginal wall prolapse during the years of 1994 to 1996 identified operative notes that described the surgical assessment of paravaginal support. These surgical findings were compared with the preoperative clinical assessment. Clinical parameters that predicted poor correlation were identified. Statistical analysis used the chi(2) test. RESULTS: One hundred seventeen patients had surgery for anterior vaginal prolapse. Seventy had documentation of an intraoperative paravaginal support evaluation. Of these, 44 patients had vaginal procedures, and 26 had abdominal procedures. All patients had at least stage 2 prolapse before surgery, and all were noted to have excellent pelvic support 4 to 6 weeks after surgery. The prevalence of paravaginal defects at surgery was 47% on the right and 41% on the left. The sensitivity and negative predictive value for the clinical assessment for paravaginal defects were good on both the right and left sides, whereas the specificity and positive predictive values were poor. Stage of prolapse, previous hysterectomy, or previous anterior colporrhaphy did not significantly affect the accuracy of the clinical examination in predicting fascial defects. However, previous retropubic urethropexy did significantly decrease the accuracy of the clinical examination in predicting right paravaginal defects (P <.01) but not left. CONCLUSION: Although preoperative clinical assessment for paravaginal defects is useful, it does not substitute for careful intraoperative evaluation for endopelvic fascial defects.

An anatomic and functional assessment of the discrete defect rectocele repair.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to describe the anatomic and functional results of the discrete fascial defect rectocele repair. STUDY DESIGN: Sixty-nine women underwent rectocele repair at Duke University Medical Center during a 3-year period beginning January 1, 1994. Repair was limited to reapproximation of discrete defects in the rectovaginal fascia, without levator plication or perineorrhaphy. Outcome measures included Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantitation measurements, prolapse stage, and a symptom questionnaire. Univariate and nonparametric tests were used as appropriate. RESULTS: Before the operation 46% patients (32/69) reported constipation, 39% (27/69) reported splinting, 32% (22/69) reported tenesmus, and 13% (9/69) reported fecal incontinence. The median preoperative posterior Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantitation stage was 2 (1-4). Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantitation stage had improved for all but 2 women at 6 weeks. Eighteen percent (8/43) had recurrent rectoceles at 12 months. Mean values for the points describing the posterior vaginal wall improved >2 cm (P <.0001). Although perineorrhaphy was not performed, the genital hiatus decreased by 2. 3 cm (P <.0001), with no significant change in the length of the perineal body. Functional results mirrored anatomic results, with statistically significant improvements for all symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: The discrete defect rectocele repair provides anatomic correction of rectoceles with alleviation of associated symptoms for most women.

Imaging studies of the pelvic floor.

A variety of imaging modalities complement the history and physical examination in the investigation of pelvic floor dysfunction in women. Current fluoroscopic techniques, including defocography, can reveal underlying pelvic floor defects by reproducing normal daily activities that cause symptoms. Magnetic resonance imaging provides fine musculoskeletal detail of this region in anatomic plane not well seen via computerized tomography. Ultrasound is used primarily in assessment of the anal sphincter muscles. Cystourethroscopy provides direct visualization of the lower urinary tract. This article describes the clinical applications and technique of each modality.

Terminology of pelvic organ prolapse.

Pelvic organ prolapse is a common gynecologic condition, yet until recently no standard classification system to describe prolapse existed. A validated and standardized terminology system is now in use that allows accurate description of physical findings as well as meaningful communication between clinicians and comparisons of published series.

Diagnosing intrinsic sphincteric deficiency: comparing urethral closure pressure, urethral axis, and Valsalva leak point pressures.

OBJECTIVES: Our purpose was to compare three measures proposed to diagnose intrinsic sphincteric deficiency: maximum urethral closure pressure, Valsalva leak point pressure, and straining urethral axis. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 159 women with pure genuine stress incontinence had the three measures determined in a standardized fashion. Critical cutoff values for the Valsalva leak point pressure (52 cm) and urethral axis (22 degrees) were established by examining relative frequency distribution curves, using closure pressure of 20 as the arbitrary benchmark value for the prevalence of intrinsic sphincteric deficiency. The distribution of cutoff values is described and differences among the measures with respect to risk factors for intrinsic sphincteric deficiency and incontinence severity were determined. RESULTS: Half the subjects fell below at least one cutoff value, but only 10% fell below all three. Sixty-four percent of subjects with either low closure pressure or leak point pressure had low values for the other, whereas 21% had discordance between them. Only 53% of subjects with low closure pressure and 40% with low leak point pressure had an axis < or = 22 degrees. Conversely, a substantial portion (36%) of subjects with pure genuine stress incontinence without urethral hypermobility had neither low urethral or leak point pressures. All three cutoff-values were associated with risk factors for intrinsic sphincteric deficiency, but only low closure and leak point pressures had significant associations with the severity of incontinence. CONCLUSIONS: Intrinsic sphincteric deficiency should be diagnosed by a composite of historic, urodynamic, anatomic, and clinical severity criteria. We would include a maximum urethral closure pressure < or = 20, a Valsalva leak point pressure < or = 50, and a stress urethral axis < or = 20 in this composite.

Sacral osteomyelitis: an unusual complication of abdominal sacral colpopexy.

BACKGROUND: Abdominal sacral colpopexy using permanent mesh is an established technique for repair of vaginal vault prolapse. Infection is not a frequent complication. We report two cases of lumbosacral osteomyelitis treated with intravenous antibiotics without mesh removal. CASES: The first patient had known advanced degenerative arthritis. Unremitting severe low back pain 5 years after abdominal sacral colpopexy prompted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), revealing osteomyelitis and diskitis. The second patient developed symptoms 2 months postoperatively, and MRI indicated osteomyelitis with epidural abscess. Both patients received intravenous antibiotics, and neither required surgical debridement or mesh removal. CONCLUSION: Osteomyelitis can present remote from the operation and can be difficult to diagnose. Protracted parenteral antibiotic therapy can be definitive treatment without mesh removal.