Thrombotic events and markers of oxidation and inflammation in hemodialysis.

The goal of this study was to determine whether antioxidant therapy with vitamin E would alter the rate of vascular access complications or other macrovascular complications in hemodialysis (HD) patients. A secondary goal of the study was to explore the relationship between baseline pretreatment markers of oxidative stress (the advanced glycation end product pentosidine and basal levels of vitamin Ealpha and gamma) and the subsequent development of access failure. Thirty-five stable patients treated by HD were recruited for the study. Patients were provided with vitamin E (800 IU) or placebo capsules to be taken daily. Clinical variables, vascular access function (flow meter access flow measurements), and circulating blood markers were obtained initially and every 3 months throughout the study. Vitamin Ealpha levels rose in treated patients from 12.7 +/- 4.4 to 25.1 +/- 15.1 microg/mL at 3 months and 28.6 +/- 14.8 microg/mL at 6 months. Vitamin Egamma levels fell in treated patients from 3.9 +/- 1.7 to 2.3 +/- 1.5 microg/mL at 3 months and 1.7 microg/mL at 6 months. Patients who subsequently developed repeated thrombotic vascular access events were characterized by higher baseline pentosidine content of circulating proteins. Patients who developed a myocardial infarction had higher pentosidine, lower vitamin Ealpha, and much lower vitamin Egamma than patients who did not develop thrombotic events. These findings lead to the speculation that the anti-inflammatory effects of vitamin Egamma may play a more important role in thrombotic vascular events than the antioxidant effects of vitamin Ealpha. Additional studies of these interactions are in progress.

Withdrawal of steroid therapy in African American kidney transplant recipients receiving sirolimus and tacrolimus.

BACKGROUND: Withdrawal of corticosteroids from the immunosuppressive regimens of kidney transplant recipients has been associated with an increased risk of acute and chronic allograft rejection. Previous studies indicate that the risk of rejection is particularly high in African Americans. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 44 African American kidney transplant recipients to participate in an uncontrolled trial in which they were initially treated with sirolimus, tacrolimus, and corticosteroids. No patient received antibody induction therapy. Prednisone was withdrawn from eligible patients free of acute rejection beginning as early as 3 months posttransplant, and followed for a minimum of 9 months posttransplant. Patients were followed for acute rejection and for changes in blood pressure, body weight, and serum creatinine concentrations before and after withdrawal of steroids. RESULTS: Thirty of 44 patients (68%) were weaned off of prednisone. Follow-up after withdrawal of prednisone ranged from 3 to 26 months (mean, 14.3+/-7.7 months). Two of 30 patients (6.7%) developed acute rejection. At last follow-up, 27 of 30 patients (90%) remain steroid-free. Steroid withdrawal was associated with significant reductions in blood pressure. CONCLUSIONS: Use of sirolimus and tacrolimus, without the use of induction antibody therapy, allows withdrawal of prednisone as early as 3 months posttransplant with low rates of subsequent acute rejection in African American kidney transplant recipients. Withdrawal of prednisone was associated with lower blood pressures and the need for fewer antihypertensive medications.

Comparison of sirolimus vs. mycophenolate mofetil on surgical complications and wound healing in adult kidney transplantation.

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and sirolimus impair wound healing. We compared sirolimus vs. MMF to determine the relative impact on surgical complications and wound healing in adult kidney transplant recipients. This retrospective, single center study of 235 adult kidney transplants performed between 1 January 2000 and 31 January 2002 identified 158 adult, kidney-only recipients treated with tacrolimus and prednisone, from which two groups were defined: group 1 (n = 84) received MMF, group 2 (n = 74) received sirolimus. The incidence of fluid collections, wound problems, dehiscence, and urine leak were compared. A multivariate stepwise logistical regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors. The overall incidence of complications was 21.5%, with rates significantly lower in group 1 (2.4%) vs. group 2 (43.2%, p < 0.0001). Regression analysis showed only sirolimus (p < 0.001) and hypo-albuminemia (p = 0.006) to independently correlate with complication occurrence. In subanalyses, lymphoceles correlated only with sirolimus (p = 0.003), while other wound problems also correlated with higher body mass index (p = 0.067). The use of sirolimus, tacrolimus and prednisone was associated with a greater incidence of lymphoceles, non-lymphocele perinephric fluid collections and other consequences of poor wound healing, as compared to contemporary patients treated with MMF, tacrolimus and prednisone.