[Psychological stressors, resources and well-being of surgeons in Germany : A cross-sectional study]. / Psychische Belastungen, Ressourcen und Wohlbefinden von Chirurgen in Deutschland : Eine Querschnittsstudie.

BACKGROUND: Psychological stress at work is associated with detrimental and health-impairing consequences for employees. OBJECTIVE: In this study major stress factors and the resource job control at the workplace of surgeons and facets of mental health were examined and compared to benchmark results of a large reference sample. METHOD: Data were collected by a representative online survey among surgeons throughout Germany who were contacted via the Professional Association of German Surgeons. In total 643 surgeons from different organizations and different disciplines completed the questionnaire that was developed using well-validated instruments. RESULTS: Time pressure was the most meaningful stress factor for surgeons. Moreover, the results for medical assistants showed adverse stress combinations of high goal uncertainty and low job control as well as high emotional exhaustion and low job satisfaction. In addition, the results indicated that surgeons in single and group practices as well as in outpatient healthcare centers have less stressors and more job resources. CONCLUSION: The survey results suggest high levels of burnout risk for German surgeons, especially among medical assistants and medical specialists from large hospitals. In order to maintain a high quality in the surgical disciplines, a concerted effort by all players in the healthcare system is necessary.

Power of Judgment: The Significance of Kant's Philosophy for the Medical System Today.

The ways of thinking in the manufacturing sciences are increasingly determining the rationality within medicine as a practical or action-based science. This "technological paradigm" infiltrates the field of medicine with the promise of increasing efficiency while simultaneously improving quality at various points in the system. Simple linear causal relationships generally need to be taken into account when manufacturing products. Even complex manufacturing processes can be broken down into the smallest units and, therefore, also be automated. The situation in complex systems such as the human body, however, is completely different. In order for doctors to be able to carry out their actions within this complex system, medicine as a science provides the physician with rules on the means that should be used to decide which remedy should be used, when and how. This judgment of which remedy should be used, when and how, what is known as the indication, is a central medical moment. This requires a power of judgment sharpened by experience. The indication, in turn, essentially determines the course of a disease and thus the quality of the treatment or the quality of result so often referred to these days.

[Trust and reliability in surgery]. / Vertrauen und Verlässlichkeit in der Chirurgie.

Social interactions are hardly possible without trust. Medical and in particular surgical actions can change the lives of people directly and indirectly existentially. Thus, the relationship between doctor and patient is a special form of social interaction, and will be hard to find anywhere else. The nature of the doctor-patient relationship also determines the success of a treatment. The core and the importance of trust, as a central part of this relationship, will be reconstructed in the present paper. The increasing possibilities of information acquisition in modern societies, and the ever-present need for transparency, impact more and more on the doctor-patient relationship. At first glance, concepts of trust seem to be of secondary importance. The current developments regarding the remuneration of services in the medical system likewise bear the risk to increasingly determine the importance of trust in the doctor-patient relationship. However, it is necessary to delineate reliability from trust. Due to the conditions which are constitutive for the operational disciplines, a climate of trust, even in a modern information society, is more necessary than ever.

[The validity of routine data on quality assurance: A qualitative systematic review]. / Die Validität von Routinedaten zur Qualitätssicherung : Eine qualitative systematische Übersichtsarbeit.

BACKGROUND: The assessment of the quality of medical practice is a legitimate requirement by society. Reliable methods for measurement of the quality of performance are sought worldwide. Quality is often quantified by using administrative data and in Germany this method has been implemented by the health insurance company AOK. OBJECTIVES: (1) How is the AOK quality system rated by senior consultant surgeons? (2) How valid are quality statements derived from administrative data? METHODS: This article was compiled following the PRISMA (i.e. preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses) statement for qualitative systematic reviews. In order to answer the first question the Professional Association of German Surgeons (Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgen) initiated two surveys and to answer the second question a structured literature search following the PICO (i.e. patient problem or population, intervention, comparison control or comparator and outcomes) format was initiated. In addition numerous websites were contacted. RESULTS: Of the responding senior consultant surgeons 95% considered that the AOK method of quality measurement by administrative data is not objective. One third was definitely wrongly classified. The literature search revealed that no validation data exist for the AOK indicators, including the Elixhauser comorbidity risk score. Altogether, the sensitivity of indicators is poor when good sensitivity is defined by the Institute for Applied Quality Improvement and Research in Health Care (AQUA Institute) as ≥ 80 < 90%. CONCLUSIONS: Quality statements resulting from administrative data alone are unreliable.

Prognostic factors following liver resection for hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: We aimed to identify prognostic factors that may allow better patient selection for liver resection for colorectal liver metastases. METHODOLOGY: A retrospective analysis of the files of 120 patients undergoing liver resection for colorectal metastases between 9/85 and 12/96 was performed. Survival and disease-free survival were calculated, and a uni- and multivariate analysis for the prognostic impact of various perioperative factors on survival was performed. RESULTS: Perioperative morbidity and mortality were 28.3% and 5.8% respectively. Median overall survival was 30 months with a 5-year survival rate of 31%. Radicality was the prime prognostic determinant. In patients with R0-resection, a liver metastasis of > 3.5 cm in diameter was the only independent factor associated with an adverse prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: Liver resection for colorectal liver metastases should be attempted if complete resection with clear margins is feasible and may be especially beneficial in patients with small (< or = 3.5 cm) lesions.

Liver resection for breast cancer metastases.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The prognosis of patients with hepatic metastases (HM) from breast cancer receiving no treatment is extremely poor. Results of systemic and regional chemotherapy as well as other treatment modalities, such as immunotherapy or hormonal therapy, are disappointing in this group of patients, with median survival rates hardly exceeding 1 year. METHODOLOGY: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients undergoing resection of isolated HM from breast cancer to determine the morbidity, mortality and prognosis following this procedure. RESULTS: Fifteen female patients underwent liver resection between September 1985 and April 1997. Two patients had synchronous and 13 patients had metachronous HM. The mean number of HM was 3.3 (1-9) (bilobar in 6 patients) with a mean diameter of 5.3 cm (2-11 cm). The following resections were performed: wedge resection (4), left lateral segmentectomy (2), right hemihepatectomy (3), left hemihepatectomy (1), extended right hemihepatectomy (3) and extended left hemihepatectomy (2). There was no hospital mortality. Morbidity (transient hepatic failure (n=2) and intra-operative hemorrhage necessitating splenectomy (n=1)) occurred in 3 patients. Median follow-up was 12 (1-88) months. Six patients developed recurrent liver disease; 2 relapsed elsewhere. Six of these 8 patients died. Overall median survival following liver resection was 57 months with 1-, 2- and 3-year survival rates of 100%, 71.4% and 53.6% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Liver resection is a viable treatment option for selected patients with isolated HM from breast cancer that can be performed safely. It should be considered in individual patients if the operative risk is low, if no extrahepatic disease is present and provided a complete resection with clear margins is technically feasible.

[Cryotherapy of liver metastases. Initial results]. / Die Kryotherapie von Lebermetastasen. Erste Ergebnisse.

PATIENTS AND METHOD: Between 1 Jan 1996 and 1 Apr 1998 29 patients underwent cryosurgical therapy for liver metastasis at the Department of Surgery at the University of Mainz. RESULTS: No complications occurred following cryosurgery alone (n = 12). Within the group of patients with a combined procedure (n = 11) 1 patient had temporary liver failure and 1 patient died of sepsis. Following freezing of the cutting zone (n = 6) 1 patient showed a bile fistula and 1 ascites. In 15 cases of 28 dismissed patients with remaining destroyed tumor tissue the follow-up showed no tumor recurrence (median follow-up 11 months). On the other hand 9 patients had a tumor recurrence within the liver, 3 patients at extrahepatic regions and 7 patients developed a tumor recurrence within the freezing zone.

[A concept for decreasing postoperative pain after inguinal hernia operation]. / Ein Konzept zur Senkung postoperativer Schmerzen nach Leistenhernienoperation.

In Germany approximately 150,000 inguinal hernias are surgically corrected every year. In addition to developing an optimum operation technique it is also the responsibility of a surgeon to treat pain during and after surgery. In a prospective random double-blind study, the pain after herniotomy performed with intraoperative anesthesia of the ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerves with a long-acting local anesthetic combined with a vasoconstrictor was compared by means of scores on a scale from 1 to 10 with pain in a control group. The results suggest that the intraoperative anesthesia reduces pain after surgery both on the day of the operation and afterwards, when the effect of the local anesthetic has decreased. An optimum pain therapy therefore has to start during surgery. Use of a local anesthetic is especially suitable. Side effects of systemic analgesics are avoided, and perioperative risks of ambulant hernia surgery can be reduced.

[Clearance behavior of the kidney in relation to ANF in the autologous dog transplantation model]. / Clearanceverhalten der Niere gegenüber ANF im autologen Hundetransplantationsmodell.

ANF is totally filtrated by the kidney and is degradated in the brush border of the tubuli. In an experimental transplant model in dogs excretion of ANF is investigated after a cold ischemia period of 48 h and HTK-protection. The ANF-renin-antagonism was of interest respectively. The experiments demonstrated that the filtration in the glomeruli and the function of the endopeptidases in the brush border is normal after a cold ischemia period of 48 and HTK-protection. There is a linear correlation between the concentration of ANF in the renal vein and the aorta. An antagonism of ANF and renin could not be found. ANF is discussed as an additional ischemia parameter in renal transplantation.