Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 140(6): 1143-9, 1983 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-6602483

ABSTRACT

A total of 1,140 primary colorectal carcinomas found in 1084 patients during a 5 1/2-year period (1976 to mid-1981) at the Mayo Clinic was reviewed to evaluate the accuracy of detection by the double- and single-contrast barium enema examinations. Both methods were equally sensitive in detecting colon cancer above the proctoscopic level. The error rate (ulcerative colitis excluded) was 4.8% for the single-contrast enema and 4.7% for the double-contrast study. Neither type of examination was superior in finding smaller lesions or earlier staged lesions. Several causes for error were identified: fluoroscopic inexperience, technical factors, misinterpretation of radiologic findings, and distraction.


Subject(s)
Barium Sulfate , Colonic Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Contrast Media , Enema , Rectal Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Adenocarcinoma/diagnostic imaging , Colonic Neoplasms/classification , Diagnostic Errors , Evaluation Studies as Topic , Humans , Methods , Neoplasm Staging , Radiography , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...