Focused abdominal ultrasound.

A focused point-of-care abdominal ultrasound is an examination performed at the patient's location and interpreted within the clinical context. This review gives an overview of this examination modality. The objective is to rapidly address predefined dichotomised questions about the presence of an abdominal aortic aneurysm, gallstones, cholecystitis, hydronephrosis, urinary retention, free intraperitoneal fluid, and small bowel obstruction. FAUS is a valuable tool for emergency physicians to promptly confirm various conditions upon the patients' arrival, thus reducing the time to diagnosis and in some cases eliminating the need for other imaging.

Focused cardiac ultrasound in emergency medicine.

Focused cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS) is a point-of-care cardiac examination performed and interpreted by the emergency physician in the clinical context. This review summarises the current knowledge of FoCUS. The objective is to answer four predefined clinical questions: Are there any signs of pericardial effusion? Are there any signs of right ventricular dilatation? Are there any signs of reduced or hyperdynamic left ventricular function? Are there any signs of abnormal inferior vena cava? FoCUS is not a replacement for echocardiography but a useful tool in detecting cardiopulmonary pathology and haemodynamic abnormalities in the emergency setting.

Lack of Thoracentesis Competencies and Training in Danish Emergency Departments: A Danish Nationwide Study.

Background: Dyspnea caused by pleural effusion is a common reason for admission to the emergency department (ED). In such cases, thoracentesis performed in the ED may allow for swift symptom relief, diagnostics, and early patient discharge. However, the competence level of thoracentesis and training in the ED are currently unclear. This study aimed to describe the current competencies and training in thoracentesis in Danish EDs. Methods: We performed a nationwide cross-sectional study in Denmark. A questionnaire was distributed to all EDs in March 2022 including questions on competencies and thoracentesis training methods. Descriptive statistics were used. Results: In total, 21 EDs replied (response rate 100%) between March and May 2022. Overall, 50% of consultant and 77% of physicians in emergency medicine specialist training were unable to perform thoracentesis independently. Only 2 of 21 EDs (10%) had a formalized training program. In these 2 EDs, there were no requirements of maintaining these competences. Informal training was reported by 14 out 21 (66%) EDs and consisted of ad-hoc bedside procedural demonstration and/or guidance. Among the 19 EDs without formalized training, 9 (47%) had no intention of establishing a formalized training program. Conclusion: We found a major lack of thoracentesis competencies in Danish EDs among both consultant and physicians in emergency medicine specialist training. Moreover, the vast majority of EDs had no formalized thoracentesis training program.

The Framing of machine learning risk prediction models illustrated by evaluation of sepsis in general wards.

Problem framing is critical to developing risk prediction models because all subsequent development work and evaluation takes place within the context of how a problem has been framed and explicit documentation of framing choices makes it easier to compare evaluation metrics between published studies. In this work, we introduce the basic concepts of framing, including prediction windows, observation windows, window shifts and event-triggers for a prediction that strongly affects the risk of clinician fatigue caused by false positives. Building on this, we apply four different framing structures to the same generic dataset, using a sepsis risk prediction model as an example, and evaluate how framing affects model performance and learning. Our results show that an apparently good model with strong evaluation results in both discrimination and calibration is not necessarily clinically usable. Therefore, it is important to assess the results of objective evaluations within the context of more subjective evaluations of how a model is framed.

[Point-of-care ultrasound in emergency departments in Denmark].

Point-of-are ultrasound (PoCUS) has become an integrated part of initial diagnostics and procedural guidance after establishing emergency departments and a speciality in emergency medicine in Denmark. Focused PoCUS is a fast examination, which is done and interpreted bedside to answer clinical, predefined dichotomous questions. Emergency physicians have an obligate course in PoCUS as part of their training and must be certified to get speciality recognition. In this review we argue, that the future of PoCUS is continuing the development of the education and training in PoCUS and in further research.

Childhood trampoline injuries.

INTRODUCTION: With the increasing use of recreational trampolines, more injuries are seen in emergency depart-ments (ED). Little is known about the relationship between adherence to safety precautions and injuries. This retro-spective study aims to describe the types of injuries and the precautions taken when using trampolines, and to investigate the relationship between injuries and safety precautions. METHODS: We reviewed patient lists and the medical records of children younger than 18 years who were treated between 1 April and 30 September 2014 at the ED of Hospital Unit West, Denmark. Demographic data and type of injury were recorded. Patients or guardians were contacted for a structured telephone interview to describe the safety precautions they had taken before the injury occurred. A total of 113 patients were identified, and 100 patients were included in the phone interviews. A total of 13 patients were excluded due to incorrect/missing phone numbers or lack of a Danish home address. RESULTS: 6% of all children treated in the ED had trampoline-related injuries. A total of 58 (51.3%) patients had fracture injuries, and 55 (48.7%) patients had non-fracture injuries. 4% had complied with all five recommended safety precautions. CONCLUSIONS: This study describes types of injuries and safety precautions related to trampoline use. 6% of all children in the ED had an injury related to trampoline use. 4% complied with all five recommended safety precautions. FUNDING: none. TRIAL REGISTRATION: not relevant.