A Multicenter, Randomized, Evaluator-Blinded Study to Examine the Safety and Effectiveness of Hyaluronic Acid Filler in the Correction of Infraorbital Hollows.

BACKGROUND: Hyaluronic acid injections are increasingly used for correction of infraorbital hollows (IOHs). OBJECTIVES: Examination of effectiveness (IOH correction) and safety of Restylane® EyelightTM hyaluronic acid (HAEYE, Galderma, Uppsala, Sweden) injections. METHODS: Subjects with moderate/severe IOHs, assessed using the Galderma infraorbital hollows scale (GIHS), were randomized to HAEYE injections (via needle/cannula) (Day 1+optional Month-1 touch up) or no-treatment control. Primary endpoint was blinded evaluator-reported Month-3 response, defined as ≥1-point GIHS improvement from baseline (both sides, concurrently). Other endpoints examined investigator-reported aesthetic improvement (GAIS), subject-reported satisfaction (FACE-Q™ satisfaction with outcome; satisfaction questionnaire), and adverse events. RESULTS: Overall, 333 subjects were randomized. Month 3 GIHS responder rate was significantly higher with HA-EYE (87.4%) versus control (17.7%; p<0.001), and comparable between HA-EYE-needle and HA-EYE-cannula groups (p=0.967). HAEYE GAIS responder rate was 87.5-97.7% (Months 3-12). Mean FACE-Q Rasch-transformed scores were 64.3-73.5 (HAEYE) versus 14.1-16.2 (control) through Month 12. Subjects reported looking younger (≥71%) and less tired (≥79%) with reduced under-eye shadows (≥76%) and recovered within 3-5 hours, post-treatment. Efficacy was maintained through Month 12 (63.5% GIHS responders) and through Month 18, after Month-12 retreatment (80.3% GIHS responders; 99.4% GAIS responders; FACE-Q scores: 72.5-72.8). Forty subjects (12.7%) reported typically mild adverse events (4.9% HAEYE-needle; 20.9% HAEYE-cannula). CONCLUSION: HAEYE treatment was effective in correcting moderate/severe IOHs at the primary endpoint (Month 3). Efficacy was sustained through Month 12 after first treatment for 63.5% and through Month 18 for 80.3% (after one retreatment) with needle or cannula administration. Safety outcomes were reassuring.

Effectiveness and Safety of a New Hyaluronic Acid Injectable for Augmentation and Correction of Chin Retrusion.

BACKGROUND: A hyaluronic acid (HA) filler intended for non-surgical improvement of chin appearance should ideally be of high strength/firmness (high G') to allow for deep injections on the bone. HASHA (Restylane Shaype) is a new hyaluronic acid (HA) injectable with high G' and high HA concentration (25 mg/mL), engineered by the new NASHA-HD (High Definition) technology. HASHA is suitable to be placed periosteally, aiming to mimic the natural shape of the bony chin. This pivotal clinical investigation evaluated effectiveness and safety of HASHA for augmentation and correction of chin retrusion.  Methods: Subjects 18 years or older with mild or moderate chin retrusion by the Galderma Chin Retrusion Scale (GCRS), were randomized 3:1 to HASHA (n=103) or no treatment (n=37). Assessments included GCRS (blinded evaluator), aesthetic improvement (Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale [GAIS]), subject satisfaction, and safety.  Results: GCRS responder rate (1-grade or greater improvement from baseline) was significantly higher for HASHA (83.3%) versus controls (10.8%) at month 3 (P<0.001) and maintained through month 12 (P<0.001). Aesthetic improvement was high throughout the study in the HASHA group, according to investigators (97% or greater) and subjects (89% or greater). Overall, subject satisfaction was high at month 3 and maintained at month 12. Product- or injection-related adverse events were mostly mild or moderate and transient. No product- or injection-related serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: HASHA, a new NASHA-HD injectable with extra strength/firmness, was safe and effective for chin augmentation and correction of chin retrusion, with high aesthetic improvement and subject satisfaction throughout 12 months. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(4):255-261.     doi:10.36849/JDD.8145.

Effectiveness and Safety of Sculptra Poly-L-Lactic Acid Injectable Implant in the Correction of Cheek Wrinkles.

BACKGROUND: The current study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of Sculptra injectable poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA-SCA) treatment in correcting cheek wrinkles compared with a no-treatment control. METHODS: Male/female immune-competent adults (aged >21 years) with moderate/severe cheek wrinkles, graded using the Galderma Cheek Wrinkle Scale (GCWS) at rest, were randomized 2:1 to receive PLLA-SCA injections (150 mg; 8 mL reconstitution in sterile water for injection) + 1 mL lidocaine hydrochloride (2%), administered immediately after reconstitution, or no treatment (control). Up to 3 additional treatments were allowed at monthly intervals, and follow-up was at months 7, 9, and 12. The primary endpoint was 1-grade or greater improvement in GCWS at rest for both cheeks at month 12. RESULTS: GCWS at rest responder rate was significantly higher with PLLA-SCA treatment versus the no-treatment control at months 7 (66.2% versus 38.6%; P=0.0043), 9 (70.6% versus 31.1%; P<0.0001), and 12 (71.6% versus 26.1%; P<0.0001). Treating investigators reported improvements in skin radiance (>95%), tighter appearance (>88%), and jawline contour (>85%). PLLA-SCA recipients reported high satisfaction levels regarding improvements in skin radiance (90% or greater), sagging (84% or greater), and firmness (91% or greater) as well as natural-looking results (85% or greater) and a desire for repeat treatment (84% or greater). Treatment-related adverse events were mostly mild in severity with no serious events related to PLLA-SCA injections. CONCLUSION: Injectable PLLA-SCA treatments were well tolerated and significantly reduced the severity of moderate/severe cheek lines and wrinkles, while improving skin quality. Effectiveness was durable over the 12-month study period with high subject-reported satisfaction, natural-looking appearance, and enthusiasm for repeat treatments. CLINICALTRIALS: gov registry number: NCT04124692J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(1):1297-1305.        doi:10.36849/JDD.7729.