Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am J Ind Med ; 65(9): 701-707, 2022 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35899403

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Workers fabricating engineered stone face high risk for exposure to respirable crystalline silica (RCS) and subsequent development of silicosis. In response, the California Division of Occupational Safety and Health (Cal/OSHA) performed targeted enforcement inspections at engineered stone fabrication worksites. We investigated RCS exposures and employer adherence to Cal/OSHA's RCS and respiratory protection standards from these inspections to assess ongoing risk to stone fabrication workers. METHODS: We extracted employee personal air sampling results from Cal/OSHA inspection files and calculated RCS exposures. Standards require that employers continue monitoring employee RCS exposures and perform medical surveillance when exposures are at or above the action level (AL; 25 µg/m3 ); exposures above the permissible exposure limit (PEL; 50 µg/m3 ) are prohibited. We obtained RCS and respiratory protection standard violation citations from a federal database. RESULTS: We analyzed RCS exposures for 152 employees at 47 workplaces. Thirty-eight (25%) employees had exposures above the PEL (median = 89.7 µg/m3 ; range = 50.7-670.7 µg/m3 ); 17 (11%) had exposures between the AL and PEL. Twenty-four (51%) workplaces had ≥1 exposure above the PEL; 7 (15%) had ≥1 exposure between the AL and PEL. Thirty-four (72%) workplaces were cited for ≥1 RCS standard violation. Twenty-seven (57%) workplaces were cited for ≥1 respiratory protection standard violation. CONCLUSIONS: Our investigation demonstrates widespread RCS overexposure among workers and numerous employer Cal/OSHA standard violation citations. More enforcement and educational efforts could improve employer compliance with Cal/OSHA standards and inform employers and employees of the risks for RCS exposure and strategies for reducing exposure.


Subject(s)
Occupational Exposure , Silicosis , California/epidemiology , Dust/analysis , Humans , Inhalation Exposure/adverse effects , Inhalation Exposure/analysis , Inhalation Exposure/prevention & control , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Occupational Exposure/analysis , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Silicon Dioxide/analysis , Silicosis/epidemiology , Silicosis/prevention & control , Workplace
2.
New Solut ; 31(4): 400-412, 2022 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34325565

ABSTRACT

We identified the occupations that employ California women and a list of chemicals of concern for breast cancer. We evaluated the likelihood of on-the-job exposure to the categories of chemicals by occupation among formally and informally employed women. We selected 145 occupations representing more than 6.6 million women (85% of California working women), along with an additional sixteen occupations for informal workers only. We organized 1012 chemicals (including mammary gland carcinogens, developmental toxicants, and endocrine-disrupting chemicals) into twenty-five categories. More than 80 percent of occupations investigated had possible or probable exposure to at least one category of chemicals. This is the first categorization of occupational exposure to chemicals of concern for breast cancer among California working women. Our investigation revealed significant data gaps, which could be improved by policy changes resulting in enhanced collection of data on occupation and chemical exposure.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Occupational Exposure , Women, Working , Breast Neoplasms/chemically induced , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , California/epidemiology , Data Visualization , Female , Humans , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Occupations
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...