Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 641
Filter
2.
Chirurg ; 89(8): 589-596, 2018 Aug.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29931379

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Mini gastric bypass/One anastomosis gastric bypass (MGB/OAGB) was the third most commonly performed procedure in Germany, with 13.9% of all obesity and metabolic procedures in 2017 (StuDoQ|MBE). OBJECTIVE: This article reviews the currently published evidence for MGB/OAGB and the historical evidence on one anastomosis reconstruction. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed in MEDLINE via PubMed and in Clinicaltrials.gov. from inception to 13 March 2018. A total of 35 studies met the inclusion criteria: 19 retrospective studies, 8 retrospective comparative trials, 2 systematic reviews, 3 systematic reviews and meta-analyses and 3 randomized clinical trials. A total of eight randomized clinical trials regarding MGB/OAGB are currently registered at Clinicaltrials.gov. RESULTS: In this study 35 eligible studies were included reporting data on >15,000 patients. The 30-day mortality rate ranged from 0-0.9% and severe complications needing intervention ranged from 0.8-7%, whereas perioperative morbidity ranged from 3.2-10.8%. The use of MGB/OAGB induced substantial weight loss with a total weight loss of 31-38% after 1 year and 23-32% after 5 years. Moreover, it showed a resolution or improvement in all major obesity-related diseases. Studies evaluating endpoints, such as end organ damage in diabetes, reduction of cardiovascular events and extending survival are missing and are available only for the Roux-en Y gastric bypass. CONCLUSION: This systematic review confirms the advantages of MGB/OAGB regarding weight loss and the antidiabetic effect in the short-term in comparison to Roux-en Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy. The role of bile reflux as a possible risk factor for neoplastic lesions in the long-term remains a point of discussion. The results of the registered randomized controlled trials will provide a better evidence in the future.


Subject(s)
Bariatric Surgery , Gastric Bypass , Obesity, Morbid , Germany , Humans , Obesity, Morbid/surgery , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Retrospective Studies , Weight Loss
3.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29671870

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of the efficacy of a wireless high-frequency stimulator placed over selected DRG of exiting nerve roots for the treatment of chronic low back pain. DESIGN: Feasibility. SUBJECTS: Six subjects with chronic, intractable back pain refractory to standard medical treatment. METHODS: Four stimulators (Freedom-4A) provided by Stimwave Technologies, were implanted over the DRG exiting nerve roots, bilaterally at both the T9 and L2 vertebral levels. Subjects were asked to evaluate stimulation independently with the devices turned on at T9 and subsequently L2 for each of 2 weeks. Subjects were then monitored for 8 weeks with the preferred stimulator. Pain reduction with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), functionality with the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) and medication usage were evaluated. RESULTS: Four subjects preferred T9 stimulation with only one subject preferring stimulation at L2. One subject dropped out of the study before conclusion of the 4-week evaluation and is not included in this report. Average pain levels (n = 5) at 12-week post-implantation decreased with 61% for back pain and 56% for leg pain with a significant reduction in pain medication, including a 100% reduction in opioid pain medications. The average reduction in disability was 12%. Subjects reported an average impression of change of 6 (1 = no change, 7 = great deal better). CONCLUSIONS: Wireless high-frequency stimulation of the DRG is a viable option to treat chronic low back pain. Preliminary results show a subject preference for stimulation at the T9 vertebral level.

5.
Zentralbl Chir ; 141(1): 45-52, 2016 Feb.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24338802

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Since January 2005, the situation of metabolic and obesity surgery in Germany has been constantly evaluated by the German Bariatric Surgery Registry (GBSR). Data registration is performed using an internet online database with prospective data collection. All registered data were analysed in cooperation with the Institute of Quality Assurance at the Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg. METHODS: Data collection includes primary and revision/redo-procedures. A main focus of the current study is the analysis of data regarding the perioperative management, in particular, administration of antibiotics. RESULTS: Since 2005 a significant increase of primary bariatric procedures has been reported. For evaluation of the antibiotic regimen 12 296 primary operations including 684 balloons (BIB), 2950 gastric bandings (GB), 5115 Roux-en-Y-gastric bypasses (RYGBP), 120 Scopinaro's biliopancreatic diversions (BPD), 164 duodenal switches (DS), 3125 sleeve gastrectomies (SG) and 138 other procedures were analysed. In total 77.3 % of the patients with primary procedures received perioperative antibiotics. Patients without concomitant comorbidities received antibiotics significantly less often compared to those with comorbidities. Wound infection rates were comparable for patients who underwent either gastric banding or sleeve gastrectomy. CONCLUSION: Surgery has been accepted step by step as a treatment for morbid obesity and its comorbidities in Germany during the last few years. There is only little experience in the literature regarding antibiotic therapy as well as prophylaxis in bariatric surgery. Based on the results of the current study we recommend rather the selective than the routine use of antibiotics depending on different parameters, e.g., operative time, preoperative BMI and concomitant comorbidities.


Subject(s)
Antibiotic Prophylaxis/methods , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/standards , Bariatric Surgery/methods , Bariatric Surgery/standards , Quality Assurance, Health Care/standards , Adult , Body Mass Index , Comorbidity , Female , Germany , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
6.
Chirurg ; 86(9): 824-32, 2015 Sep.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26296509

ABSTRACT

BACKROUND: Metabolic surgery is internationally well-established for the treatment of obesity and its comorbidities. The numbers of procedures performed is steadily increasing. The results of surgery are superior in comparison to conservative treatment options regarding weight loss and resolution of comorbidities. The insufficiency of suture lines is a well-known and feared complication in the stapling procedures and is associated with an increased morbidity as well as mortality, especially in super obese patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The current literature was reviewed and the results are reported within the context of own experience. RESULTS: The most severe complications are staple line leakage after sleeve gastrectomy, leakage of anastomoses after bypass procedures and duodenal stump insufficiency. For the treatment of sleeve leakage various endoscopic procedures, such as over the scope (OTS) clips, stents and endoluminal vacuum therapy are available. Surgical revision, such as oversuturing, drainage and redo surgery are well-established. The management of all other complications is mainly by surgical intervention. Intraoperative standardization of procedures and knowledge of the physical foundations are essential for the prevention of leakage. Several preventive methods are available but randomized controlled trials are missing. CONCLUSION: The therapy of leakages in the field of bariatric surgery is an interdisciplinary approach and dependent on the available resources in the treating hospital. The data reported show good results but the different reports published are inconsistent. Leakages often do not occur in the immediate postoperative period but in the sense of a long-term complication; therefore standardization of procedures and follow-up as well as complication management is mandatory. Randomized controlled studies must be promoted.


Subject(s)
Anastomotic Leak/surgery , Bariatric Surgery , Postoperative Complications/surgery , Surgical Wound Dehiscence/surgery , Anastomosis, Surgical/methods , Anastomotic Leak/etiology , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Reoperation , Surgical Staplers , Surgical Wound Dehiscence/etiology , Suture Techniques
7.
Zentralbl Chir ; 140(3): 285-93, 2015 Jun.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25906018

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The current situation in obesity and metabolic surgery since January 2005 has been investigated with the help of the quality assurance study on surgical therapy for obesity = German Bariatric Surgery Registry (GBSR). The data were acquired and analysed in cooperation with the Institute for Quality Assurance in Surgical Medicine at the Otto-von-Guericke University. METHODS: Data acquisition was done with the help of an online database. On a voluntary basis, all obesity and metabolic surgical interventions since 2005 have been recorded. In addition to the surgical data, the findings of the yearly follow-up investigations were recorded. RESULTS: Since 2005 there have been 1,263 gastric balloon procedures, 11,840 sleeve gastrectomies, 13,722 Roux-en-Y gastric bypasses and 3999 gastric banding operations. The average age of the male patients in all interventions was significantly higher. The average BMI of female patients who received a gastric banding or a gastric balloon procedure was significantly lower than that of the male patients. Men exhibited a higher incidence of comorbidities than women. CONCLUSION: The number of obesity and metabolic surgical interventions in Germany is continuously increasing. The results of the study on surgical therapy for obesity (GBSR) reveal significant differences in the gender-specific incidence of preoperative comorbidities. postoperative complications and mortality. Further studies on gender-specific aspects are necessary in order to optimise patient selection and reduce the incidence of postoperative complications.


Subject(s)
Bariatric Surgery/statistics & numerical data , Obesity/epidemiology , Registries/statistics & numerical data , Sex Characteristics , Body Mass Index , Comorbidity , Cross-Sectional Studies , Germany , Humans , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Quality Assurance, Health Care , Risk Factors
8.
Obes Surg ; 25(5): 755-62, 2015 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25502287

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery outcomes have been examined in Germany since January 1, 2005. All data were registered prospectively in cooperation with the Institute of Quality Assurance in Surgery at the Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg. METHODS: The data were collected from an online data bank. Data collection began in 2005 for gastric banding (GB) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) results. In addition to primary bariatric operations, data regarding the complications of revision procedures and redo operations were analyzed. Participation in the quality assurance study was required for all certified centers in Germany. RESULTS: RYGBs are a popular redo operation after failed gastric banding. In the German Bariatric Surgery Registry (GBSR), we analyzed data from 263 RYGB operations that used a one-step approach after GB and 116 operations that used a two-step approach. The leakage rates for primary RYGB decreased to 1.8%. The incidence of leakage after a one-step RYGB after GB was lower (1.9%) than after the two-step procedure (2.6%). CONCLUSION: RYGBs are popular procedures after failed GB in Germany. The multivariable analysis for overall intraoperative complications revealed a significant difference between the two-step and the one-step procedure. In an unadjusted and multivariate assessment, the one-step procedure had statistically lower general postoperative complications than the two-step approach. Therefore, we suggest performing band removal and RYGB as a one-step procedure. Further analysis is necessary to evaluate the risk factors for the one-step procedure. Follow-up investigations must be performed to determine whether RYGB is an effective and safe option after GB.


Subject(s)
Gastric Bypass/methods , Gastroplasty , Obesity/surgery , Adult , Aged , Female , Gastroplasty/methods , Germany , Humans , Intraoperative Complications/epidemiology , Intraoperative Complications/etiology , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Quality Assurance, Health Care , Registries , Reoperation , Treatment Outcome
9.
Chirurg ; 86(1): 56-66, 2015 Jan.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24622739

ABSTRACT

Bariatric surgery is known to be the most effective and long-lasting treatment for morbid obesity and associated comorbidities. These comorbidities together with cardiopulmonary decompensation make morbidly obese patients a high risk group for operative interventions. Early detection of postoperative complications is a challenging task in these patients and requires accurate and timely interpretation of any alarm signals. Symptoms, such as tachycardia and abdominal pain are highly suspicious. The same applies to elevated inflammatory parameters and fever. Early diagnostic laparoscopy is mandatory once cardiopulmonary complications have been excluded. Moreover, it has a higher sensitivity and specificity than other radiological modalities and is a minimally invasive procedure with a highly satisfactory outcome.


Subject(s)
Bariatric Surgery/adverse effects , Intraoperative Complications/diagnosis , Intraoperative Complications/therapy , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Postoperative Complications/therapy , Abdominal Pain/diagnosis , Abdominal Pain/etiology , Adult , Body Mass Index , Early Diagnosis , Female , Germany , Humans , Intraoperative Complications/etiology , Laparoscopy , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Quality Assurance, Health Care , Reoperation , Retrospective Studies , Tachycardia/diagnosis , Tachycardia/etiology
10.
Chirurg ; 86(4): 346-54, 2015 Apr.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24824002

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Increasing numbers of interventions for obesity and metabolic surgery have led to an increase of primary bariatric operations as well as redo operations and revisional surgery after various primary bariatric procedures. Evidence-based guidelines for indications and choice of procedure for revisional surgery do not currently exist. AIM: The spectrum of various revisional and redo operations following standard operative procedures for obesity and metabolic surgery is presented based on current data from the German bariatric surgery registry (GBSR, German nationwide survey on quality assurance in bariatric surgery) and a literature search. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Since 1 January 2005, the current situation of bariatric surgery has been examined using the GBSR. All data are registered prospectively in cooperation with the Institute of Quality Assurance in Surgery at the Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg. Since 2005 a total of 24,070 primary bariatric procedures, 2070 revisional procedures and 1124 redo operations were analyzed. The study evaluated 1021 revisional and 491 redo operations after gastric banding (GB), 443 redo operations after sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and 306 revisional procedures and 10 redo operations after a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP). RESULTS: Reoperations of GB to SG were performed in 240 cases. The complication rate for GB removal and SG showed a significantly higher leakage rate for one step operations than for two step procedures of 3.3% vs. 0.0%. Conversion of GB to RYGBP was performed in 402 operations without any significant differences between one and two step approaches (1.9% vs. 2.2%). The specific complication rate in the 443 interventions in patients for conversion from SG to RYGBP was 10.8% which is higher than for primary SG (4.9%) and RYGBP (5.3%). CONCLUSION: Compared with the primary surgical procedures redo operations and revisional procedures have significantly higher complication rates. The data evaluated show that strong and differentiated indications are necessary for revisional and redo operations particularly in cases of therapy or metabolic failure.


Subject(s)
Bariatric Surgery , Postoperative Complications/surgery , Bariatric Surgery/statistics & numerical data , Cross-Sectional Studies , Germany , Mathematical Computing , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Prospective Studies , Quality Assurance, Health Care , Registries , Reoperation/statistics & numerical data , Statistics as Topic , Utilization Review/statistics & numerical data
11.
Rozhl Chir ; 93(7): 366-78, 2014 Jul.
Article in Czech | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25263472

ABSTRACT

In 2012, an outstanding expert panel derived from IFSO-EC (International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity - European Chapter) and EASO (European Association for the Study of Obesity), composed by key representatives of both Societies including past and present presidents together with EASOs OMTF (Obesity Management Task Force) chair, agreed to devote the joint Medico-Surgical Workshop of both institutions to the topic of metabolic surgery as a pre-satellite of the 2013 European Congress on Obesity (ECO) to be held in Liverpool given the extraordinarily advancement made specifically in this field during the past years. It was further agreed to revise and update the 2008 Interdisciplinary European Guidelines on Surgery of Severe Obesity produced in cooperation of both Societies by focusing in particular on the evidence gathered in relation to the effects on diabetes during this lustrum and the subsequent changes that have taken place in patient eligibility criteria. The expert panel composition allowed the coverage of key disciplines in the comprehensive management of obesity and obesity-associated diseases, aimed specifically at updating the clinical guidelines to reflect current knowledge, expertise and evidence-based data on metabolic and bariatric surgery.


Subject(s)
Bariatric Surgery/methods , Obesity, Morbid/surgery , Diabetes Mellitus , Humans , Obesity/surgery
12.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther ; 40(6): 582-609, 2014 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25078533

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Obesity surgery is acknowledged as a highly effective therapy for morbidly obese patients. Beneficial short-term effects on common comorbidities are practically undisputed, but a growing data pool from long-term follow-up reveals increasing evidence of potentially severe nutritional and pharmacological consequences. AIMS: To assess the prevalence, causes and symptoms of complications after obesity surgery, to elucidate and compare therapy recommendations for macro- and micronutrient deficiencies, and to explore surgically-induced effects on drug absorption and bioavailability, discussing ramifications for long-term therapy and prophylaxis. METHODS: PubMed, Embase and MEDLINE were searched using terms including, but not limited to, bariatric surgery, gastric bypass, obesity surgery and Roux-en-Y, coupled with secondary search terms, e.g. anaemia, micronutrients, vitamin deficiency, bacterial overgrowth, drug absorption, pharmacokinetics, undernutrition. All studies in English, French or German published January 1980 through March 2014 were included. RESULTS: Macro- and micronutrient deficiencies are common after obesity surgery. The most critical, depending on surgical technique, are hypoalbuminemia (3-18%) and deficiencies of vitamins B1 (≤49%), B12 (19-35%) and D (25-73%), iron (17-45%) and zinc (12-91%). Many drugs commonly administered to obese patients (e.g. anti-depressants, anti-microbials, metformin) are subject to post-operative and/or PPI-associated changes affecting bioavailability and absorption. CONCLUSIONS: Complications are associated with pre-operative and/or post-operative malnutrition or procedure-related changes in intake, absorption and drug bioavailability. The high prevalence of nutrient deficiencies after obesity surgery makes life-long nutritional monitoring and supplementation essential. Post-operative changes to drug absorption and bioavailability in bariatric patients cast doubt on the validity of standard drug dosage and administration recommendations.


Subject(s)
Bariatric Surgery , Deficiency Diseases/etiology , Obesity, Morbid/surgery , Postoperative Complications , Biological Availability , Humans , Hypoalbuminemia/etiology , Pharmaceutical Preparations/metabolism , Pharmacokinetics
13.
Obes Surg ; 24(10): 1625-33, 2014 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24748472

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Since 1 January 2005, bariatric surgery has been monitored in Germany. All related data are registered prospectively in cooperation with the Institute of Quality Assurance in Surgery at the Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg. METHODS: Data collection regarding obesity and metabolic surgery was started in an online database in 2005. Follow-up data are collected once a year. Participation in the quality assurance study is voluntary. RESULTS: Since 2005, 10,330 Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) procedures have been performed in Germany. In total, 8,013 patients were female and 2,317 were male. Male patients suffered significantly more comorbidities than female patients. The men also had higher body mass indexes (BMIs) and ages than the women at the time of operation. Data on the gender-specific aspects of RYGB from the Nationwide Survey of Bariatric Surgery in Germany (GBSR) showed a significant difference in anastomotic insufficiency at the gastro-entero-anastomosis. The leakage rate was 2.37 % (55/2,317) in men and 1.68 % (135/8,013) in women. Additionally, specific complication and mortality rates were significantly higher in male than in female patients. CONCLUSIONS: Metabolic and obesity surgery is becoming increasingly popular in Germany. Data from the GBSR show significant differences in preoperative comorbidities and postoperative complication and mortality rates between male and female patients. There is a need for further evaluation of gender-specific aspects to optimize patient selection and reduce specific postoperative complications.


Subject(s)
Gastric Bypass/adverse effects , Obesity, Morbid/surgery , Adult , Body Mass Index , Comorbidity , Databases, Factual , Female , Gastric Bypass/standards , Germany/epidemiology , Humans , Intraoperative Complications/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Obesity, Morbid/epidemiology , Patient Selection , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Quality Assurance, Health Care , Registries , Sex Factors , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
15.
Obes Surg ; 24(1): 9-14, 2014 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23999964

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Since 1 January 2005, the outcomes of bariatric surgeries have been examined in Germany. All data are registered prospectively in cooperation with the Institute of Quality Assurance in Surgery at Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg. METHODS: Data are collected in an online data bank. Data collection began in 2005 for the results of gastric banding (GB) and in 2006 for sleeve gastrectomies (SGs). In addition to primary bariatric operations, data regarding the complications of revision procedures and redo operations have been analyzed. Participation in the quality assurance study is required for all certified centers in Germany. RESULTS: SGs are a popular redo operation after failed gastric banding. Using the German Bariatric Surgery Registry, we analyzed data from 137 SGs that were used in a one-step approach after GB and 37 SGs that were used in a two-step approach. Leakage rates for primary SGs dropped to 1.9 %. The incidence of leakage after a one-step SG after GB is significantly higher (4.4 %) than for a two-step approach (0 %). CONCLUSION: SGs are popular procedures after failed GB in Germany, but the complication rates for one-step band removal are higher than for a two-step approach. After examining the data, we suggest performing band removal and SG as a two-step procedure. Further analysis is necessary to evaluate the optimal time period between band removal and SG. Follow-up investigations must be performed to determine if SG is an effective and safe option after GB.


Subject(s)
Gastrectomy/adverse effects , Obesity/surgery , Reoperation/methods , Adult , Aged , Bariatric Surgery/adverse effects , Bariatric Surgery/statistics & numerical data , Databases, Factual , Female , Gastrectomy/statistics & numerical data , Gastroplasty/adverse effects , Gastroplasty/statistics & numerical data , Germany/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Obesity/epidemiology , Quality Assurance, Health Care , Registries , Reoperation/adverse effects , Reoperation/statistics & numerical data , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
16.
Int J Obes (Lond) ; 38(3): 334-40, 2014 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24048144

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To examine the safety and effectiveness of adolescent bariatric surgery and to improve treatment recommendations for this age group. DESIGN: Prospective longitudinal registry. Since January 2005, patients undergoing bariatric surgery in Germany are enlisted in an online registry called 'study for quality assurance in obesity surgeries'. SUBJECTS: Adolescents and young adults up to the age of 21 years, operated from January 2005 to December 2010. MEASUREMENTS: Weight, BMI, comorbidities, complication rates. RESULTS: N=345 primary procedures were recorded by 58 hospitals. N=51 patients were under the age of 18 years. Follow-up information was available for 48% (n=167) of patients, with an average observation period of 544±412 days (median: 388 days). The most common surgical techniques were gastric banding (n=118, 34.2%), gastric bypass (n=116, 33.6%) and sleeve gastrectomy (n=78, 22.6%). Short-term complications (intra-operative; general postoperative; specific postoperative) were slightly lower for gastric banding (0.8%; 2.5%; 0.8%) than for gastric bypass (2.6%; 5.2%; 1.7%) or sleeve gastrectomy (0%; 9.0%; 7.7%). In accordance with published findings, weight and BMI reduction were lower for gastric banding (-28 kg; -9.5 kg m(-2)) compared to gastric bypass (-50 kg; -16.4 kg m(-2)) P< 0.001 or sleeve gastrectomy (-46 kg; -15.4 kg m(-2)) P< 0.001. Outcomes did not differ between the <18 and ≥18-year-old patients. CONCLUSION: Like in adults, bariatric surgery has low short-term complication rates and results in sustained weight loss in adolescents. However, the missing long-term observations prohibit a final conclusion about lasting effectiveness and safety. Clinical trials with structured follow-up programs and mechanisms to ascertain patient adherences are needed.


Subject(s)
Gastrectomy , Gastric Bypass , Obesity, Morbid/surgery , Weight Loss , Adolescent , Comorbidity , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Gastrectomy/adverse effects , Gastric Bypass/adverse effects , Germany/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Obesity, Morbid/blood , Obesity, Morbid/epidemiology , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Patient Selection , Prospective Studies , Registries , Remission Induction/methods , Risk Assessment , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
17.
Obes Surg ; 24(1): 42-55, 2014 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24081459

ABSTRACT

In 2012, an expert panel composed of presidents of each of the societies, the European Chapter of the International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity (IFSO-EC), and of the European Association for the Study of Obesity (EASO), as well as of the chair of EASO Obesity Management Task Force (EASO OMTF) and other key representatives from IFSO-EC and EASO, devoted the joint Medico-Surgical Workshop of both institutions to the topic of metabolic surgery in advance of the 2013 European Congress on Obesity held in Liverpool. This meeting was prompted by the extraordinary advancement made in the field of metabolic and bariatric surgery during the past decade. It was agreed to revise and update the 2008 Interdisciplinary European Guidelines on Surgery of Severe Obesity produced by focusing in particular on the evidence gathered in relation to the effects on diabetes and the changes in the recommendations of patient eligibility criteria. The expert panel allowed the coverage of key disciplines in the comprehensive management of obesity and obesity-associated diseases, aimed specifically at updating the clinical guidelines to reflect current knowledge, expertise and evidence-based data on metabolic and bariatric surgery.


Subject(s)
Bariatric Surgery , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/surgery , Obesity/surgery , Adolescent , Adult , Bariatric Surgery/methods , Bariatric Surgery/psychology , Bariatric Surgery/standards , Child , Europe , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Obesity/complications , Obesity/psychology , Postoperative Care , Preoperative Care
18.
Nutr Hosp ; 28 Suppl 2: 31-4, 2013 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23834044

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Obesity surgery is an effective method for treating obesity and diabetes mellitus type 2. This type of diabetes can be completely resolved in 78.1% of diabetic patients and can be improved or resolved in 86.6% of diabetic patients. But little is known about bariatric surgery in type 1 diabetes mellitus. METHODS: We report of 6 female obese patients with diabetes mellitus type 1 who had bariatric surgery. Two of them underwent Roux-en Y gastric bypass (RNYGB), one of them had sleeve gastrectomy and the remaining three had biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal-switch (BPD-DS). RESULTS: Our results showed a remarkable weight reduction as well as an improvement in their blood glucose control and the insulin requirement in the followup years after surgery. Pre-surgery the BMI of our 6 patients ranged between 37.3-46.0 kg/m2 and improved to 25.8-29.0 kg/m2 one year after surgery. HbA1c decreased from 6.7-9.8% pre-surgery to 5.7-8.5% after one year post-surgery. The total amount of daily insulin requirement was reduced from 62-150 IU/day pre-surgery to 15- 54 IU/day after one year. CONCLUSION: The results are impressive and show an improvement in insulin sensitivity following obesity surgery. However, an optimal blood glucose control still remains very important in the therapy of diabetes mellitus type 1 to avoid long-term-complications.


Introducción: La cirugía de la obesidad es un método eficaz para el tratamiento de la obesidad y la diabetes mellitus tipo 2. Este tipo de diabetes puede se resuelve por completo en el 78,1% de los pacientes diabéticos y mejora en el 86,6% de los pacientes diabéticos. Sin embargo, poco se sabe acerca de la cirugía bariátrica en la diabetes mellitus tipo 1. Métodos: Presentamos 6 pacientes mujeres obesas con diabetes mellitus tipo 1 que se sometieron a cirugía bariátrica. Dos de ellas fueron sometidas a un bypass gástrico en-Y-Roux (BPGYR), una se le realizó una gastrectomía en manga y a las tres restantes una derivación biliopancreática con-switch duodenal (DBP-SD). Resultados: Nuestros resultados mostraron una reducción de peso notable, así como una mejora en el control de la glucosa en sangre y el requerimiento de insulina en los años de seguimiento después de la cirugía. El IMC prequirúrgico de las 6 pacientes osciló entre 37,3-46,0 kg/m2 y mejoró a 25,8-29,0 kg/m2 un año después de la cirugía. La HbA1c disminuyó de 6,7-9,8% antes de la cirugía a 5,7-8,5% un año después de la cirugía. El requerimiento diario de insulina se redujo de 62-150 UI/día antes de la cirugía a 15-54 UI /día al cabo de un año. Conclusión: Los resultados son impresionantes y muestran una mejora en la sensibilidad a la insulina tras una cirugía de la obesidad. No obstante, un control óptimo de la glucosa de sangre sigue siendo muy importante en la terapia de la diabetes mellitus tipo 1 para evitarcomplicaciones a largo plazo.


Subject(s)
Bariatric Surgery , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/complications , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/surgery , Obesity/complications , Obesity/surgery , Adult , Female , Humans , Middle Aged
19.
Obes Surg ; 23(11): 1783-9, 2013 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23612866

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Since 1 January 2005, the situation of bariatric surgery has been examined in Germany. All data are registered prospectively in cooperation with the Institute of Quality Assurance in Surgery at the Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg. METHODS: Data collection on the results of gastric banding procedures was started in 2005, and the data are registered in an online database. Follow-up data were collected once a year. Participation in the quality assurance study is voluntary. RESULTS: Since 2005, 3,453 gastric banding procedures have been performed at 88 hospitals. The mean age of patients was 40.7 years, and the mean body mass index (BMI) was 45.2 kg/m2. BMI and comorbidities are significantly higher in male patients. Regarding gender-specific aspects, there are no significant differences in the perioperative complication rates. The amelioration rate of comorbidities in male patients is lower than in female patients. CONCLUSION: Gastric banding in Germany is generally performed in patients with a BMI below 45 kg/m2. The perioperative complication rate is low. Data from the nationwide survey of the German Bariatric Surgery Registry show significant differences in preoperative comorbidities and their amelioration between male and female patients. There is a need for further evaluation of gender-specific aspects of gastric banding procedures to optimize patient selection, reduce specific postoperative complications, and achieve long-term effects on weight loss and remission of comorbidities.


Subject(s)
Gastroplasty/methods , Obesity, Morbid/epidemiology , Patient Selection , Quality Assurance, Health Care , Adult , Body Mass Index , Comorbidity , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/surgery , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Gastroplasty/adverse effects , Germany/epidemiology , Humans , Hypertension/epidemiology , Hypertension/surgery , Male , Obesity, Morbid/complications , Obesity, Morbid/surgery , Sex Distribution , Sleep Apnea Syndromes/epidemiology , Sleep Apnea Syndromes/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Weight Loss
20.
Zentralbl Chir ; 138(2): 180-8, 2013 Apr.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22753146

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Since January 1st 2005, the situation of bariatric surgery has been examined in Germany. All data are registered prospectively in cooperation with the Institute of Quality Assurance in Surgery at the Otto-von-Guericke University of Magdeburg. METHODS: The voluntary data registration occurs in an internet online data bank. All primary bariatric procedures as well as re- and redo-procedures are documented. Follow-up data were collected once a year. Participation in the quality assurance study is obligatory for certificated centres. RESULTS: Since 2005 13,879 bariatric procedures have been performed at 83 hospitals. The number of primary procedures has increased from 596 in 2005 to 11,835 in 2010. Revisional surgery has been performed in 1,438 patients since 2005. Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is the major procedure with 1,564 operations in 2010. The mean BMI was 48.8 kg/m². The incidence of comorbidities was 84.8%. CONCLUSION: Bariatric surgery has become more accepted in Germany. Beside the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, sleeve gastrectomy is the most frequently performed operation. BMI and incidence of comorbidities are still high in comparison with literature values. Due to the lack of evidence, more randomised studies are necessary to standardise operative techniques and evaluate patient selection criteria. Quality assurance studies support a detailed analysis of these parameters.


Subject(s)
Bariatric Surgery/standards , Data Collection/standards , Quality Assurance, Health Care/standards , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Bariatric Surgery/trends , Body Mass Index , Child , Comorbidity , Data Collection/trends , Female , Gastric Bypass/standards , Gastric Bypass/trends , Gastroplasty/standards , Gastroplasty/trends , Germany , Health Status Indicators , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care/standards , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care/trends , Patient Selection , Quality Assurance, Health Care/trends , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...