Improved outcomes for spinal versus general anesthesia for hip fracture surgery: a retrospective cohort study of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of consensus in the literature as to whether anesthetic modality influences perioperative complications in hip fracture surgery. The aim of the present study was to assess the effect of spinal anesthesia compared with general anesthesia on postoperative morbidity and mortality in patients who underwent hip fracture surgery using data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP). METHODS: We used the ACS NSQIP to identify patients aged 50 and older who received either spinal or general anesthesia for hip fracture surgery from 2016 to 2019. Propensity-score matching was performed to control for clinically relevant covariates. The primary outcome of interest was the combined incidence of stroke, myocardial infarction (MI) or death within 30 days. Secondary outcomes included 30-day mortality, hospital length of stay and operative time. RESULTS: Among the 40 527 patients aged 50 and over who received either spinal or general anesthesia for hip fracture surgery from 2016 to 2019, 7358 spinal anesthesia cases were matched to general anesthesia cases. General anesthesia was associated with a higher incidence of combined 30-day stroke, MI or death compared with spinal anesthesia (OR 1.219 (95% CI 1.076 to 1.381); p=0.002). General anesthesia was also associated with a higher frequency of 30-day mortality (OR 1.276 (95% CI 1.099 to 1.481); p=0.001) and longer operative time (64.73 vs 60.28 min; p<0.001). Spinal anesthesia had a longer average hospital length of stay (6.29 vs 5.73 days; p=0.001). CONCLUSION: Our propensity-matched analysis suggests that spinal anesthesia as compared with general anesthesia is associated with lower postoperative morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery.

Patient- and Hospital- Level Disparities in Severe Maternal Morbidity: a Retrospective Multistate Analysis, 2015-2020.

The rate of severe maternal morbidity (SMM) in the United States (US) rose roughly 9% among all insured racial/ethnic groups between 2018 and 2020, disproportionately affecting racial and ethnic minority populations. Limited research on hospital-level factors and SMM found that even after adjusting for patient-level factors, women of all races delivering in high Black-serving delivery units had higher odds of SMM. Our retrospective cohort study augments the current understanding of multi-level racial/ethnic disparities in SMM by analyzing patient- and hospital- level factors using multistate data from 2015 to 2020. Because rises in SMM have been driven in part by an increase in blood transfusions, multivariable logistic regression models were employed to estimate the impact of patient- and hospital-level factors on the adjusted odds of experiencing any SMM, with and without blood transfusions, as well as blood transfusions alone. Our cohort consisted of 3,497,233 deliveries: 56,885 (1.63%) with any SMM, 16,070 (0.46%) with SMM excluding blood transfusion, and 45,468 (1.30%) with blood transfusions alone. We found that Black race, Hispanic ethnicity, and delivering at Black-serving delivery-units, both independently and interactively, increase the odds of any SMM with or without blood transfusions. Our findings illustrate the persistence of structural- and individual- level racial and ethnic disparities in maternal outcomes over time and emphasize the need for multi-level public policies to address racial/ethnic disparities in maternal healthcare.