Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Osteoporos Int ; 32(3): 451-465, 2021 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32935171

ABSTRACT

Our aim was to explore change in kyphosis and vertebral fracture incidence following 8 months of high-intensity resistance and impact training (HiRIT) or machine-based isometric axial compression (IAC) training in men with osteopenia and osteoporosis. HiRIT and IAC improved posture. HiRIT participants did not experience progression or incident vertebral fracture. IAC participants did experience progression and incident vertebral fracture. INTRODUCTION: The Lifting Intervention For Training Muscle and Osteoporosis Rehabilitation for Men (LIFTMOR-M) trial examined efficacy and safety of an eight-month, supervised, high-intensity progressive resistance and impact training (HiRIT) program compared with machine-based isometric axial compression (IAC) training in middle-aged and older men with low areal bone mineral density (aBMD). The primary purpose of the current work was to explore change in thoracic kyphosis and incident fracture from vertebral morphology following eight-months of HiRIT or IAC training. The secondary purpose was to explore change in clinical kyphosis measures for HiRIT, IAC and a non-randomized, matched control group. METHODS: Men (≥ 45 yrs), with low aBMD, were recruited and randomized to HiRIT or IAC, or designated control. Clinical measures of thoracic kyphosis with inclinometry were determined. Cobb angle of kyphosis and vertebral fracture assessment using the Genant semi-quantitative method were determined from lateral thoracolumbar DXA (Medix DR, Medilink, France). Per-protocol (n = 40) and intention-to-treat (n = 93) analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Forty participants (HiRIT n = 20, IAC n = 20; 66.1 ± 7.8 yrs.; lumbar spine T-score - 0.1 ± 0.8; femoral neck T-score - 1.5 ± 0.5) underwent clinical kyphosis measures and thoracolumbar DXA at baseline and follow-up. No between-group differences were detected in kyphosis change, however, within-group improvements in neutral (HiRIT - 2.3 ± 0.8°; IAC - 2.5 ± 0.8°) and 'standing tall' (HiRIT - 2.4 ± 0.8°; IAC - 2.0 ± 0.8°) postures were observed (p < 0.05). HiRIT improved Cobb angle (- 3.5 ± 1.5°, p = 0.027) from baseline. Over the 8 months, no incident vertebral fractures nor progression of prevalent vertebral fractures occurred for HiRIT participants. Five incident fractures of thoracic vertebrae occurred for IAC and one wedge fracture progressed. Ninety-three participants underwent clinical kyphosis measures at both time-points (HiRIT n = 34, IAC n = 33, control n = 26). HiRIT exhibited a reduction in 'standing tall' kyphosis compared to control (- 2.3 ± 0.6° versus 1.4 ± 0.7°, p < 0.05), but no other between-group differences were detected. CONCLUSIONS: Although there was no difference in change between intervention groups, thoracic kyphosis appeared to improve in both HiRIT and IAC with exercise exposure. HiRIT improved 'standing tall' posture in comparison to usual activities. HiRIT was not associated with vertebral fracture progression or incident vertebral fracture, but for some IAC participants there was evidence of progression of vertebral fracture severity and incident vertebral fractures, in our small sample. Larger trials are required to confirm the observations of the current work, which was exploratory in nature.


Subject(s)
Bone Diseases, Metabolic , Kyphosis , Osteoporosis , Spinal Fractures , Aged , Bone Diseases, Metabolic/etiology , France , Humans , Kyphosis/complications , Lumbar Vertebrae/injuries , Male , Middle Aged , Muscles , Osteoporosis/etiology , Spinal Fractures/etiology , Thoracic Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Thoracic Vertebrae/injuries
2.
Osteoporos Int ; 30(5): 957-964, 2019 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30612163

ABSTRACT

Our aim was to assess risk of vertebral fracture during high-intensity resistance and impact training (HiRIT) for postmenopausal women with low bone mass. HiRIT did not induce vertebral fracture, as evidenced by a reduction in kyphosis following 8 months of training and a lack of change in vertebral morphology. INTRODUCTION: The LIFTMOR trial demonstrated a novel, HiRIT program notably improved bone mass in postmenopausal women with osteopenia and osteoporosis. While no clinical signs or symptoms of vertebral crush fracture were evident during the trial, anecdotal feedback suggests that concerns about safety of HiRIT in the osteoporosis demographic remain. The aim of the current work was to assess vertebral body morphology, Cobb angle, and clinical measures of thoracic kyphosis in participants in the LIFTMOR trial for evidence of vertebral fracture following 8 months of supervised HiRIT. METHODS: Participants were randomized to either 8 months of 30-min, twice-weekly, supervised HiRIT or unsupervised, low-intensity, home-based exercise (CON). Lateral thoracolumbar DXA scans (Medix DR, Medilink, France) were performed at baseline and follow-up. Cobb angle was determined, and vertebral fracture identification was performed using the semiquantitative Genant method. Clinical kyphosis measurements were performed in relaxed standing (neutral posture) and standing tall using an inclinometer and a flexicurve. RESULTS: The HiRIT group exhibited a reduction in inclinometer-determined standing tall thoracic kyphosis compared to CON (- 6.7 ± 8.2° vs - 1.6 ± 8.1°, p = 0.031). Both the HiRIT and CON groups exhibited within-group improvement in kyphosis in relaxed standing as measured by both inclinometer and flexicurve (p < 0.05). There were no changes in vertebral fracture classification in the HiRIT group post-intervention. A single, new, wedge deformity was observed for CON. CONCLUSIONS: Supervised HiRIT was not associated with an increased risk of vertebral fracture in postmenopausal women with low bone mass. Indeed, a clinically relevant improvement in thoracic kyphosis was observed following 8 months of supervised HiRIT, further supporting its efficacy as an osteoporosis intervention for postmenopausal women with low to very low bone mass.


Subject(s)
Exercise Therapy/adverse effects , Kyphosis/rehabilitation , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/rehabilitation , Osteoporotic Fractures/etiology , Spinal Fractures/etiology , Absorptiometry, Photon , Aged , Body Height/physiology , Bone Density/physiology , Exercise Therapy/methods , Female , Humans , Kyphosis/etiology , Kyphosis/physiopathology , Lumbar Vertebrae/injuries , Middle Aged , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/complications , Osteoporotic Fractures/physiopathology , Resistance Training/adverse effects , Resistance Training/methods , Risk Assessment/methods , Single-Blind Method , Spinal Fractures/physiopathology , Thoracic Vertebrae/injuries
3.
Osteoporos Int ; 26(12): 2889-94, 2015 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26243363

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: The aim of the LIFTMOR (Lifting Intervention For Training Muscle and Osteoporosis Rehabilitation) trial is to determine the safety and efficacy of brief, bone-targeted, high-intensity progressive resistance training (HiPRT) with impact loading for postmenopausal women with low bone mass. Preliminary findings indicate the LIFTMOR program is safe and effective. INTRODUCTION: Despite a lack of notable efficacy, exercise guidelines for osteoporosis typically recommend moderate-intensity exercises, owing to a perceived risk of fracture from high-intensity loading. Indeed, safety concerns alone have prevented the well-recognised preferential response of bone tissue to high-intensity loads from being applied to those who stand to benefit the most. To progress from this therapeutic stalemate, a challenge to conventional wisdom was required. Our goal was to examine the safety and efficacy of HiPRT and impact loading for risk factors of osteoporotic fracture in postmenopausal women with low to very low bone mass. METHODS: Participants have been randomised to either 8 months of twice-weekly 30-min supervised HiPRT and impact loading or a low-intensity home-based exercise program of the same duration and dose. Testing at baseline and follow-up has included anthropometry; bone, muscle, and fat mass; and functional performance. RESULTS: Twenty-eight women (66.1 ± 4.8 years, mean lumbar spine T-score -2.15 ± 0.72) have completed the study. HiPRT and impact loading (n = 12) improved height (0.4 ± 0.2 cm vs -0.3 ± 0.1 cm, p = 0.003), femoral neck bone mineral density (0.3 ± 0.5 % vs -2.5 ± 0.8 %, p = 0.016), lumbar spine bone mineral density (1.6 ± 0.9 % vs -1.7 ± 0.6 %, p = 0.005), and functional performance (p < 0.05), compared to controls (n = 16). Compliance has been >87 %. There have been no injuries. CONCLUSIONS: Brief supervised HiPRT with impact loading is a safe and effective exercise therapy for postmenopausal women with low to very low bone mass.


Subject(s)
Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/rehabilitation , Resistance Training/methods , Aged , Anthropometry/methods , Body Composition/physiology , Bone Density/physiology , Exercise Therapy/methods , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/complications , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/physiopathology , Osteoporotic Fractures/etiology , Osteoporotic Fractures/prevention & control , Patient Compliance/statistics & numerical data , Resistance Training/adverse effects , Risk Factors , Single-Blind Method
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...