ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To compare the changes in visual and ocular parameters in individuals with retinal drusen who were treated with two commercially available nutritional supplements. METHODS: An open-label, single-center, randomized, parallel-treatment with an observational control group design was utilized. The treatment groups included individuals with fine retinal drusen sub-clinical age-related macular degeneration (AMD), while the control group consisted of ocular normal individuals. The treatment groups were randomly assigned to the micronized lipid-based carotenoid supplement, Lumega-Z (LM), or the PreserVision Age-Related Eye Disease Study 2 (AREDS-2) soft gel (PV). Visual performance was evaluated using the techniques of visual acuity, dark adaptation recovery and contrast sensitivity, at baseline, three months, and six months. Additionally, the macular pigment optical density (MPOD) was measured. The control group was not assigned any carotenoid supplement. The right eye and left eye results were analyzed separately. RESULTS: Seventy-nine participants were recruited for this study, of which 68 qualified and 56 participants had useable reliable data. Of the individuals who completed this study, 25 participants belonged to the LM group, 16 belonged to the PV group, and 15 to the control group. The LM group demonstrated statistically significant improvements in contrast sensitivity function (CSF) in both eyes at six months (p < 0.001). The LM group displayed a positive linear trend with treatment time in CSF (p < 0.001), with benefits visible after just three months of supplementation. Although there was a trend showing improvement in CSF in the PV group, the change was not significant after a Bonferroni-corrected p-value of p < 0.00625. Visual acuity, dark adaptation recovery and MPOD did not significantly improve in either treatment groups. CONCLUSION: The LM group demonstrated greater and faster benefits in visual performance as measured by CSF when compared to the PV group. This trial has been registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03946085).
Subject(s)
Carotenoids/administration & dosage , Dietary Supplements , Lipids/administration & dosage , Macular Degeneration/therapy , Retinal Drusen/therapy , Aged , Female , Humans , Lutein/administration & dosage , Macular Degeneration/metabolism , Macular Pigment/metabolism , Male , Middle Aged , Retinal Drusen/metabolism , Treatment Outcome , Visual Acuity/drug effects , Zeaxanthins/administration & dosageSubject(s)
Amphetamines/therapeutic use , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Depressive Disorder, Major/drug therapy , Adolescent , Amphetamines/administration & dosage , Antidepressive Agents/administration & dosage , Asian , Central Nervous System Stimulants/administration & dosage , Central Nervous System Stimulants/therapeutic use , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , HumansABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Inhibition of intestinal peristalsis is a major side effect of opioid analgesics. Although tramadol is an opioid-like analgesic, its effect on gut motility is little known. Therefore, the effect of (+)-tramadol, (-)-tramadol and the major metabolite O-desmethyltramadol on intestinal peristalsis in vitro and their mechanisms of action were examined. Distension-induced peristalsis was recorded in fluid-perfused segments of the guinea pig small intestine. The intraluminal peristaltic pressure threshold (PPT) was used to quantify the motor effects of extraserosally administered drugs. RESULTS: Racemic tramadol, its (+)- and (-)-enantiomers and the major metabolite O-desmethyltramadol (0.1-100 microM) concentration-dependently increased PPT until peristalsis was transiently or persistently abolished. The rank order of potency was (-)-tramadol < (+)-tramadol Subject(s)
Intestine, Small/drug effects
, Peristalsis/drug effects
, Tramadol/metabolism
, Tramadol/pharmacology
, Animals
, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
, Female
, Guinea Pigs
, Intestine, Small/physiology
, Male
, Peristalsis/physiology
, Stereoisomerism
, Tramadol/analogs & derivatives
, Tramadol/chemistry
ABSTRACT
Inhibition of intestinal peristalsis is a major side effect of opioid analgesics. It is unknown whether non-opioid analgesics, such as acetaminophen, acetylsalicylic acid, and dipyrone, exert any effect on intestinal motility. In the current in vitro study we examined the effect of these analgesics on intestinal peristalsis and analyzed some of their mechanisms of action. In isolated segments of the guinea pig small intestine peristalsis was triggered by a perfusion-induced increase of the intraluminal pressure. The peristaltic pressure threshold (PPT) at which peristaltic waves were elicited was used to quantify drug effects on peristalsis. Vehicle (Tyrode's solution), acetaminophen (0.01-100 microM), acetylsalicylic acid (100-300 microM), and dipyrone (10-100 microM) were added extraserosally to the organ bath. Acetaminophen concentration-dependently increased PPT and abolished peristalsis in four of six segments at the concentration of 10 microM and in all segments tested at 100 microM (EC50=6.0 microM). The increase in PPT resulting from 3 microM acetaminophen was reduced by naloxone and apamin but not changed by L-nitro-arginine methylester (L-NAME), its inactive enantiomer D-NAME, acetylsalicylic acid, methysergide, or tropisetron. Acetylsalicylic acid and dipyrone did not affect peristalsis. The results reveal, for the first time, that acetaminophen concentration-dependently impairs intestinal peristalsis, whereas acetylsalicylic acid and dipyrone lacked such an effect. The inhibition caused by acetaminophen involves transmitters acting via small conductance Ca2+-activated potassium channels, endogenous opioidergic pathways, and presumably inhibition of cyclooxygenase-3.