ABSTRACT
A retrospective literature survey (1980-1992) was conducted to chronicle the development of panic disorder treatment research. Based on a National Institute of Mental Health conference on assessment standardization in this area (Shear and Maser, 1994), the results and implications of the survey are presented in terms of eight domains of measurement recommended as essential for high quality research.
Subject(s)
Clinical Trials as Topic/standards , Panic Disorder/therapy , Phobic Disorders/therapy , Agoraphobia/diagnosis , Agoraphobia/psychology , Agoraphobia/therapy , Anxiety Disorders/diagnosis , Anxiety Disorders/psychology , Anxiety Disorders/therapy , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Panic Disorder/diagnosis , Panic Disorder/psychology , Personality Assessment , Phobic Disorders/diagnosis , Phobic Disorders/psychology , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Reviewing the recent literature on the overlapping spectrum of neurotic depressive and dysthymic conditions--unofficially referred to as "minor," "atypical" or "characterologic" depressives--the authors conclude that significant symptomatologic admixtures with anxiety disorders do not represent the prototypical features of these disorders as defined in DSM-III-R. It is long-standing anhedonia on an intermittent or chronic basis which appears to characterize the trait illness of dysthymia. The emerging data on dysthymia suggest that it begins early in life, is often complicated by major depressions, and pursues a chronic--often pernicious--course. The development of hypomanic switches during the prospective course of some of these patients further suggests some kinship to bipolar disorder. Although traditionally conceived as being largely "psychogenic," familial data and selected biologic indices--especially in the area of sleep--and thymoleptic responsiveness impart some credibility to the role of biologic factors in the origin of these disorders. Given the high prevalence of dysthymic conditions in clinical practice, new research strategies on their causes are needed as a precondition for more rational treatment approaches.
Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder/diagnosis , Terminology as Topic , Depressive Disorder/classification , Depressive Disorder/psychology , Female , Humans , MaleABSTRACT
A survey of the uses and attitudes of 146 mental health professionals, primarily psychiatrists and psychologists, in 42 countries (not including the United States) toward the 3rd edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-III) and its revision (DSM-III-R; American Psychiatric Association, 1980,1987) is reported. The results revealed wide-spread endorsement of the multiaxial system, theoretical neutrality, descriptive symptom criteria forming discrete categories, and the placement of personality disorders on a separate axis. We report that the DSM-III and DSM-III-R are more widely used around the world than the International Classification of Diseases for teaching, research, and clinical practice. Opinions about various dimensions of the DSM's usefulness and shortcomings are presented.
