Best Practices for Microbial Challenge In-use Studies to Evaluate the Microbial Growth Potential of Parenteral Biological Products; Industry and Regulatory Considerations.

Microbial challenge in-use studies are performed to evaluate the potential for microbial proliferation in preservative-free single dose biological products after first puncture and potential accidental contamination during dose preparation (e.g. reconstitution, dilution) and storage. These studies, in addition to physicochemical in-use stability assessments, are used as part of product registration to define in-use hold times in Prescribing Information and in the pharmacy manual in the case of clinical products. There are no formal guidance documents describing regulator expectations on how to conduct microbial challenge in-use studies and interpret microbial data to assign in-use storage hold-times. In lieu of guidance, US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulators have authored publications and presentations describing regulator expectations. Insufficient or unavailable microbial challenge data can result in shortened in-use hold times, thus microbial challenge data enables flexibility for health care providers (HCPs) and patients, while ensuring patient safety. A cross-industry/FDA in-use microbial working group was formed through the Innovation & Quality (IQ) Consortium to gain alignment among industry practice and regulator expectations. The working group assessed regulatory guidance, current industry practice via a blinded survey of IQ Consortium member companies, and scientific rationale to align on recommendations for experimental design, execution of microbial challenge in-use studies, and a decision tree for microbial data interpretation to assign in-use hold times. Besides the study execution and data interpretation, additional considerations are discussed including use of platform data for clinical stage products, closed system transfer devices (CSTDs), transport of dose solutions, long infusion times, and the use of USP <797> by HCPs for preparing sterile drugs for administration. The recommendations provided in this manuscript will help streamline biological product development, ensure consistency on assignment of in-use hold times in biological product labels across industry, and provide maximum allowable flexibility to HCPs and patients, while ensuring patient safety.

Current Industry Best Practice on in-use Stability and Compatibility Studies for Biological Products.

Evaluating the in-use stability of a biological product including its compatibility with administration components allows to define handling instructions and potential hold times that retain product quality during dose preparation and administration. The intended drug product usage may involve the dilution of drug formulation into admixtures for infusion and exposure to new interfaces of administration components like intravenous (iv) bags, syringes, and tubing. In-use studies assess the potential impact on product quality by simulating drug handling throughout the defined in-use period. Considering the wide range of in-use conditions and administration components available globally, only limited guidance is available from regulators on expected in-use stability data. A working group reviewed and consolidated industry approaches to assess physicochemical stability of traditional protein-based biological products during clinical development and for commercial use. The insights compiled in this review article can be leveraged across the industry and encompass topics such as representative drug product material and administration components, testing conditions, quality attributes evaluated and respective acceptance criteria, applied quality standards, and regulatory requirements. These practices may help companies in the study design, and they may inform discussions with global regulators.

Development of the Drug Product Formulation of the Bevacizumab Biosimilar PF-06439535 (Bevacizumab-bvzr).

BACKGROUND: PF-06439535 (bevacizumab-bvzr; Zirabev®) is a biosimilar of bevacizumab reference product (RP; Avastin®). This study describes the formulation development for PF-06439535. METHODS: PF-06439535 was formulated in several buffers and stored for 12 weeks at 40 °C to determine the optimal buffer and pH under stressed conditions. Subsequently, PF-06439535 at 100 and 25 mg/mL was formulated in a succinate buffer with sucrose, edetate disodium dihydrate (EDTA), and polysorbate 80, and in the RP formulation. Samples were stored at - 40 °C to 40 °C for ≤ 22 weeks. The physicochemical and biological properties relevant to the safety, efficacy, quality, or manufacturability were investigated. RESULTS: When stored at 40 °C for 13 days, PF-06439535 demonstrated optimal stability in histidine or succinate buffers and was more stable in the succinate formulation than the RP formulation, under both real-time and accelerated stability conditions. There were no significant changes in the quality attributes of 100 mg/mL PF-06439535 after storage at - 20 °C and - 40 °C for 22 weeks, and there were no changes in the quality attributes of 25 mg/mL PF-06439535 after storage at 5 °C (recommended storage temperature). Changes were observed at 25 °C for 22 weeks or at 40 °C for 8 weeks as expected. No new degraded species were observed in the biosimilar succinate formulation compared with the RP formulation. CONCLUSIONS: Results demonstrated that 20 mM succinate buffer (pH 5.5) is the PF-06439535 preferred formulation, and that sucrose is an effective cryoprotectant for processing and frozen storage, and an effective stabilizing excipient for 5 °C liquid storage of PF-06439535.

Physicochemical stability of PF-06439535 (bevacizumab-bvzr; Zirabev®), a bevacizumab biosimilar, under extended in-use conditions.

INTRODUCTION: PF-06439535 (bevacizumab-bvzr; Zirabev®) is a bevacizumab biosimilar. The stability profile and functional activity of PF-06439535 after dilution for intravenous infusion was evaluated following extended storage conditions. METHODS: PF-06439535 drug product was diluted in 0.9% sodium chloride to produce final concentrations of 1.4 and 16.5 mg/mL of PF-06439535, representing clinically relevant low and high doses for intravenous infusion. Three drug product lots and three infusion bag types (polyolefin, ethylene vinyl acetate, and polyvinyl chloride) were tested. To simulate the potential preparation and administration conditions encountered in a clinical setting, prepared drug solutions were initially stored at 25 ± 5°C for 24 ± 2 h, and then at 5 ± 3°C for up to 6 weeks. Extended storage was followed by storage at 25 ± 5°C for 24 ± 2 h before testing. Physicochemical and biological stability were evaluated according to visual characteristics and pH, protein concentration, particulate content, the proportions of molecular weight variants and charge variants, and relative potency. A wide range of analytical techniques optimized for PF-06439535 assessment were employed, such as size-exclusion chromatography, non-reducing sodium dodecyl sulfate capillary electrophoresis, cation-exchange chromatography, far-UV circular dichroism spectroscopy, differential scanning calorimetry, and an in vitro cell-based bioassay. RESULTS: For all concentrations, drug product lots, infusion bag types, and time points tested, there were no significant changes in protein concentration and no notable differences in visual characteristics (color, clarity, and visible particulates). The abundance of molecular weight variants and charge variants remained stable over the 6-week study period. There were no stability concerns with regard to sub-visible particles. There were no significant changes in primary, secondary, or tertiary structure. Finally, the in vitro relative potency of PF-06439535 was maintained throughout the study period. CONCLUSIONS: The stability and biological activity of PF-06439535 was maintained after dilution and storage for up to 6 weeks at 2-8°C, demonstrating the integrity of diluted PF-06439535 under extended in-use conditions.

Physicochemical stability of PF-05280014 (trastuzumab-qyyp; TrazimeraTM), a trastuzumab biosimilar, under extended in-use conditions.

INTRODUCTION: The stability and functional activity of the trastuzumab biosimilar PF-05280014 (trastuzumab-qyyp; TrazimeraTM), was assessed under extended in-use conditions. METHODS: PF-05280014 was diluted in 0.9% sodium chloride to final concentrations of 0.2 mg/mL and 4 mg/mL in 3 different types of infusion bags (polyolefin, ethylene vinyl acetate, and polyvinyl chloride). Infusion bags containing diluted PF-05280014 were stored at 25 ± 5° C for 24 h, before storage at 5 ± 3° C for 0, 1, 2, 4, or 6 weeks. Following extended storage, samples of PF-05280014 were removed from the infusion bags and stored at 25 ± 5° C for 24 h before biophysical and functional characterization. In addition to the visual characteristics of each sample at the various time points, the stability of PF-05280014 was assessed using a variety of biophysical techniques, including size-exclusion high-performance liquid chromatography, non-reducing sodium dodecyl sulfate capillary electrophoresis, cation-exchange chromatography, peptide mapping, far-UV circular dichroism spectroscopy, and differential scanning calorimetry. The functional activity of PF-05280014 was evaluated using a cell-based growth inhibition assay. RESULTS: For all PF-05280014 concentrations, time points and infusion bags tested, there were no significant differences in visual characteristics or in protein concentration. The were no significant changes in the relative abundance of molecular weight or charge variants throughout the 6-week study period. Similarly, there were no significant changes in primary structure or in secondary structure content during the study. The relative potency of PF-05280014 was also maintained throughout the 6-week period. CONCLUSIONS: The stability and functional activity of PF-05280014 was maintained following dilution in 0.9% sodium chloride and storage for up to 6 weeks at 2-8° C.

Effects of Transportation of IV Bags Containing Protein Formulations Via Hospital Pneumatic Tube System: Particle Characterization by Multiple Methods.

In hospitals, often drug products in intravenous (IV) bags are transported via pneumatic tube systems (PTS). The goal of this study was to evaluate the effects of such transportation of protein products on particle formation in polyvinyl chloride (PVC) and polyolefin (PO) IV bags, containing either IV saline or dextrose. We studied intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and a monoclonal antibody (mAb). Particles were quantified with flow imaging, light obscuration and nanoparticle tracking analysis. PTS transportation of IVIG caused large increases in protein particle concentrations, with much greater increases observed in saline than in dextrose. The increases were greater in IV solutions in PO than those in PVC bags. With the mAb, PTS transportation in saline caused increases in protein particle levels in PO bags, but not in PVC bags. Transportation in dextrose did not result in significant increases in mAb particle concentrations in IV bags made of either material. Overall, the results document that the PTS transportation can result in large increases in protein particles and that magnitude of these increases depends the protein itself, the bag material and the IV solution. The main conclusion is that protein products in IV solutions should not be transported in hospital PTS.

An Industry Perspective on the Challenges of Using Closed System Transfer Devices with Biologics and Communication Guidance to Healthcare Professionals.

Closed system transfer devices (CSTDs) have been used with hazardous drugs for several decades. The goal of this whitepaper is to increase awareness among healthcare professionals, device manufacturers, regulators, and pharmaceutical/biotech companies on the potential issues around the use of CSTDs with biologic drug products to allow their informed use in clinics. Specifically, we discuss the key topics related to the use of CSTDs with biologics products, including components and materials of construction, a breakdown of regulatory, technical, clinical site-related risks and challenges associated with the use of CSTDs with biological products, gathered from stakeholder discussion at the IQ CSTD workshop, and considerations on current testing requirements and communication strategies to drive further dialog on the appropriate use of CSTDs. Given the technical challenges of using CSTDs with biologics, coupled with the current regulations surrounding CSTD approval and proper use, as well as a need for alignment and standardization to enable a consistent strategy for compatibility testing and communication of incompatibilities, it is recommended that global health authorities and other stakeholders seek to understand these issues, in order to alleviate these problems and keep healthcare workers and patients safe from harm.

An Industry Perspective on Compatibility Assessment of Closed System Drug-Transfer Devices for Biologics.

The Formulation Workstream of the BioPhorum Development Group (BPDG), an industry-wide consortium, has identified the increased use of closed system drug-transfer devices (CSTDs) with biologics, without an associated compatibility assessment, to be of significant concern. The use of CSTDs has increased significantly in recent years due to the recommendations by NIOSH and USP that they be used during preparation and administration of hazardous drugs. While CSTDs are valuable in the healthcare setting to reduce occupational exposure to hazardous compounds, these devices may present particular risks that must be adequately assessed prior to use to ensure their compatibility with specific types of drug products, such as biologic drugs, which may be sensitive. The responsibility of ensuring quality of biologic products through preparation and administration to the patient lies with the drug product sponsor. Due to the significant number of marketed CSTD systems, and the large variety of components offered for each system, a strategic, risk-based approach to assessing compatibility is recommended herein. In addition to traditional material compatibility, assessment of CSTD compatibility with biologics should consider additional parameters to address specific CSTD-related risks. The BPDG Formulation Workstream has proposed a systematic risk-based evaluation approach as well as a mitigation strategy for establishing suitability of CSTDs for use.

Challenges of Using Closed System Transfer Devices With Biological Drug Products: An Industry Perspective.

Hazardous drug is a common term used by the National Institute of Occupational Health and Safety (NIOSH) to classify medications that may induce adverse mutagenic and reproductive responses in health care personnel. NIOSH publishes a list of drugs it defines as hazardous where it may be appropriate for health care workers to take protective measures to reduce the potential for occupational exposure. Recent updates and proposed updates to this list have included large molecule biological products with oncology indications. Both NIOSH and USP <800> recommend the use of closed system transfer devices (CSTDs) during compounding. CSTDs are required for administration of prepared solution in NIOSH. However, USP has suggested that the principles of <800> are broadly applicable to hazardous drug handling activities across all facility types. USP encourages the widespread adoption and use of <800> across all health care settings, which many health care workers have interpreted beyond compounding to include administration and preparation of conventionally manufactured sterile products per approved labeling. Although the use of CSTDs may reduce exposure of health care personnel to chemotherapy agents in health care setting, the impact of CSTDs on quality of biologic drug products, including monoclonal antibodies and other proteins, is not fully understood. To complicate this issue further, there are several commercially available CSTDs in the market which have different fluid paths and material of construction that comes in contact with the drug. Testing every combination of CSTD and drug product for potential incompatibilities can be a labor intensive and impractical approach and cause delay in getting essential drugs to patients. A panel discussion was held at a recent American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists 2018 PharmSci 360 conference to discuss the impact of CSTDs on biologics. Impact on subvisible and visible particulates and impact to other product quality attributes such as high molecular weight species formation upon contact with CSTDs were reported in American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists meeting. Impact to deliverable dose, holdup volumes of various CSTDs, and stopper coring were also reported that has significant impact to patient safety. Given the fact that USP chapter <800> will be implemented in December 2019, feedback from health authorities regarding the use of CSTDs for biological drug products is needed to provide an appropriate risk/benefit balance to ensure patient safety and quality of the biologic drug product while also protecting the health care worker and the environment. The purpose of this commentary is to provide an industry perspective on the challenges during the use of CSTDs for biologic drug products and is intended to raise caution and awareness on the benefits and shortcomings of these devices.